Hi!
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Steffen Möller steffen_moel...@gmx.de wrote:
For the future, is there a way to have some bits not forwarded?
Or to have them only selectively forwarded? Well, the mailing
list, probably.
You can tag the posts and have a RSS (for that specific tag) that
Hi!
After updating sofa-framework (both the build-deps for the new
libqwt-dev and an include path) I can't pass this:
http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/sofa-framework_1.0~beta4-6_i386.build.txt
Any ideas/suggestion/patches? :-)
Latest debian/ dir is in our SVN.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Hi Dominique!
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Dominique Belhachemi
domi...@debian.org wrote:
Does the following description work for anyone since the changes on alioth?
For SVN it works:
svn co svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/
For git:
git clone
Hi!
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Dominique Belhachemi
domi...@debian.org wrote:
It still doesn't work for me. All I get is the following error message:
Can you ssh directly to the host?
Are you using VerifyHostKeyDNS in your ~/.ssh/config for Debian hosts?
ssh -v svn.debian.org can give us
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
BTW, is there anybody who might care for including the Debian Med blog
into planet.debian.org?
The name that will appear on Planet is better as Debian Med or
Debian in Biology and Medicine?
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com wrote:
The name that will appear on Planet is better as Debian Med or
Debian in Biology and Medicine?
Or Debian Med Team or a better name :-)
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
As a planet.d.o ignorant I can not give good advise here. If the usual
Blogs are issued by *persons* the Debian Med Team is probably matching
this person-approach. If also *projects* are posting there any of the
above
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com wrote:
If I did it right, it should appear as Debian Med
Already updated. It's there! :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Hi!
I did a new checkout from our SVN repository (svn checkout
svn+ssh://nao...@svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk) to update
raster3d but I saw that all files are locked.
Am I missing something or it's lack of caffeine?
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira
nao...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I missing something or it's lack of caffeine?
As always, the problem is the stupid user :-)
It seems that files were locked due to an interrupted svn update
(thus needing a svn cleanup)
Best regards,
Nelson
Hi!
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Thorsten Alteholz
debian-...@alteholz.de wrote:
There are about 1800 files to be checked.
Are there any tools to make this task a bit easier?
licensecheck (from the devscripts package) can help you, but it's
still highly recommended to manually review all
Hi!
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Thorsten Alteholz
debian-...@alteholz.de wrote:
PS: Does anybody know of problems with alioth? All my connections are
refused. Wouldn't this be a nice opportunity for a tweet?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-infrastructure-announce/2011/05/msg0.html
;-)
Hi!
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Nicolas Barbier
nicolas.barb...@gmail.com wrote:
Patch for paper-text.tex attached.
I have commited your changes, thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Michael Hanke m...@debian.org wrote:
I committed another set of changes, but then started to conflict with
'naoliv' and stopped for now. When is the final deadline?
Sorry :-(
I did finish the typos that I found, however, so there won't be any
more conflicts
Hi Steffen!
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Steffen Möller steffen_moel...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Gregor, have many thanks! I'll upload later tonight.
Note that on i386, kfreebsd-i386 and hurd-i386 it should be patched to
don't use SSE too.
See
Hi Misha!
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:06 PM, misha680 misha...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a link to the uploaded package:
http://www.2shared.com/file/SeV8AGVg/openmrs_161-1_all.html
The binary packages (.deb files) aren't usefull for review. We need
the .dsc, .orig.tar.gz (or .orig.tar.bz2) and
Hi!
Still about the compiler flags for hmmer (#594860), on i386 [1] and
kfreebsd-i386 [2] it's being used the SSE implementation (compiled
with -msse2).
While it's almost sure that people who use hmmer have processors =
Pentium 4 and Athlon 64, there is still a small probability that some
users
Hi again!
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com wrote:
Still about the compiler flags for hmmer (#594860), on i386 [1] and
kfreebsd-i386 [2] it's being used the SSE implementation (compiled
with -msse2).
Also on hurd-i386 (from https://buildd.debian.org
Hi!
(It wasn't me who broke it)
It works nicely here on Chomium, Opera and Iceweasel.
But indeed, it fails to validate with the W3C validator.
I have removed one php close tag (that was wrong).
Steffen, can you see if it still fails on Firefox, please?
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To
Hi Steffen!
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Steffen Möller steffen_moel...@gmx.de wrote:
It is the very same, still. I think it is just the hellip; that it
complains about.
Removed all the ellipsis entries (they weren't necessary, but indeed
it would be better to use #8230; instead hellip;)
Hi Steffen!
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Steffen Möller steffen_moel...@gmx.de wrote:
this has fixed the first problem. Now another one surfaced.
Now it should be clean it seems.
Can you retest it only to confirm, please?
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone knows if there is something particular going on with NEW
package ? dicomscope/pixelmed have not been uploaded (submitted ~3
weeks ago).
Actually it can take months (so 3 week is normal) to new
Hi!
While fixing the watch file of phyml, I saw that its version number in
debian/changelog is 200900706 while upstream version is 20090706
(there is one more zero on our version number).
Is this a typo?
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Hi!
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Eric MAEKER eric.mae...@free.fr wrote:
But 'svn checkout svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk' ask me to
type a password and does not reconize it.
It seems that you are missing your username:
svn co
Hi!
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org wrote:
Great; thanks! I have been tracking full history in a private svn
repository, so I'll be wanting to convert that to git; any tips on
doing so?
See the package git-svn
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi!
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Mathieu
Malaterremathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking at the list file contained in dicom3tools and it seems
I am missing the binaries (dciodvfy, dctable...) !
I tried duplicating the issue here but I cannot (*). Is there an
issue with the
Hi!
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Mathieu
Malaterremathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
nawk: cannot open /dev/tty for output (No such device or address)
Wild guess is that it's a problem with awk.
Take a look at http://www.gnu.org/manual/gawk/html_node/Special-FD.html
It seems to be caused by
Hi!
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Mathieu
Malaterremathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
I am starring at the puiparts right now, I have been reading the FAQ
but I still do not understand what this means:
http://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/d/dicom3tools.html
Could someone please let me
Hi!
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Mathieu
Malaterremathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
Could someone let me know what is happening.
(...)
Rejected: md5sum for
/srv/ftp.debian.org/queue/new/dicom3tools_1.0~20090716.orig.tar.gz
doesn't match dicom3tools_1.0~20090716-2.dsc.
Probably you are
Hi!
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Steve M. Robbinsst...@sumost.ca wrote:
The package is still in NEW, but I believe you can make a second
upload of the same revision and it will be overwritten. If that
doesn't work, you can definitely make a revision -2 upload; both will
appear in the NEW
Hi!
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Mathieu
Malaterremathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
Should be all done. I tried compiling with gcc-snapshot and it
compiled ok (tons of warnings though).
Just committed two small fixes and uploaded it.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi!
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Mathieu
Malaterremathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
Everything should have been taken care of.
Uploaded, with some fixes too
(http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-commit/2009-August/003853.html).
Thank you.
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To
Hi!
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Mathieu
Malaterremathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems that since I rename pvrg into pvrg-jpeg, the ITP is not being
taken into account properly...
Do I need to do something ?
Hum, I realize that pvrg-jpeg was uploaded as experimental maybe this
is
Hi!
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:47 AM, mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
dicom3tools is now completely lintian clean from warning. Anyone to sponsor
the upload ?
Almost :-)
Still needs to see:
W: dicom3tools source: dh-clean-k-is-deprecated
W: dicom3tools source: out-of-date-standards-version
Hi!
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Mathieu
Malaterremathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
Could someone (a DD) please review my dicom3tools package. Lintian
does not report any error anymore now.
There are some warnings when checking the version on svn (with
debian/changelog entry from Fri,
Hi Charles!
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Charles Plessyple...@debian.org wrote:
we have a patch in the Debian package mummer for which we lost origin and
detailed description. I would like to forward it upstream, but I would prefer
to know what it does before ;) Would somebody have a few
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Mathieu
Malaterremathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
Could someone please sponsor the pvrg package, I have cleanup the
remaining lintian issues.
Not fully clean :-)
See the attached lintian output.
Wouldn't it be better to have the source package and the
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Andreas Tille til...@rki.de wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
This link might be of interest .
https://svn.opensourcery.com/public/elementalclinic/trunk/docs/DEBIAN
from packaging perspective.
At least not for me because I can not
Hi!
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Scott Christley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think biococoa and sequenceconverter.app are ready for upload!
biococoa is failing to build:
$ pdebuild
dpkg-buildpackage: set CFLAGS to default value: -g -O2
dpkg-buildpackage: set CPPFLAGS to default value:
Hi!
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 8:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added:
trunk/packages/mustang/trunk/debian/patches/04-gcc-4.3-exit
Modified:
trunk/packages/mustang/trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/packages/mustang/trunk/debian/control
trunk/packages/mustang/trunk/debian/patches/00list
Hi!
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Description: maps short fixed-legth polymporphic DNA sequence reads to
reference sequences
+Description: maps short fixed-legth polymorphic DNA sequence reads to
reference sequences
Isn't it fixed-length? (missing a N)
Best
Hi!
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically what I did was to disable the building of local zlib, include
the zlib.h from /usr/include instead of the local one, and add -lm and
-lz to CFLAGS from CDBS. Any idea what -lm and -lz mean?
You are linking
Hi David!
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:11 AM, David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've done some maintainance on proda [1] -- I believe it could be uploaded
for
a maintainance revision.
Uploaded, thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hi my friends!
I am sending this message to you because I know that I need to (or will
have to) answer/read some of your messages /do something for you.
The problem is: I was at the hospital for 8 days (surgery). Before this
I was really bad too. So for sure I have a lot of messages to reply,
Ha! :-D
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is a great day for me and I would like to give a big THANK YOU to
everybody who made it possible. Special thanks to Andreas Tille, my
advocate, Christoph Berg, my AM, and Anìbal Monsalve Salazar, my first
Hi!
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The watch file informs the Debian maintainer about new upstream versions.
I have to admit that I failed to get a notice about new upstream versions
for packages I would like to watch. I know that I could run uscan
Hi!
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is in our SVN repo with a watch file for you to upload the original
sources. I am still not yet a DD, so I need somebody to sponsor this
pacakge to NEW.
It seems that almost every test is failing here (and
Hi!
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:24 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[HELP] Added watch file but this does not work. :-(( Any clue?
It's working here:
$ uscan --report-status
Processing watchfile line for package epcr...
Newest version on remote site is 2.3.9, local version is 1.2.0
epcr: Newer
Hi!
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My pbuilder is borken and I had no time to learn sbuild. Can somebody
upload bioperl? The main changes are:
Somebody has uploaded it :-)
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi!
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What shall we do for the mailing lists? Just delete? I do not mind this
but I do not feel like taking the decision alone.
I agree with whatever you choose ;-)
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Charles!
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The clustalw package is ready for upload. There has been a new upstream
release this week, in which a new option has been introduced
(-fullhelp). Also, Clustal packages have a new home, www.clustal.org.
Hi Charles!
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
Bumped copyrights to 2008
I have already uploaded it :-(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:33 AM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a new upstream release of primer3 that fixes a bug reported in
Ubuntu (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/primer3/+bug/191053).
There.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi!
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Charles Plessy
clustalx is ready, but clustalw is not yet lintian-clean. Nevertheless,
clustalx will have to go to NEW, so I guess it will not hurt if it is
uploaded a bit before clustalw.
Hum... directly on incoming :-)
Nelson
--
To
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Give me one week and I will commit gff2ps, gff2aplot, gdpc, raster3d,
biofox and biosquid to our repository.
OK, one week (not one hour more, trust me
Hi Charles!
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just one doubt about the process: there are already binary
packages for clustalx 1.83 in non-free. Will they be overwritten or will
they cause a problem?
Actually, I think that the best
Hi!
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not only use 1.83-4? It will replace the one already available.
It is a new package, I do not know if it would work… Doesn't it need to
end by -1? Otherwise, this would be obviously the thing to do.
Hi!
On Feb 13, 2008 5:20 AM, David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SSHing, and checking, here's what happened:
$ ls -lah bugs.php ddtp.php
-rw-rw-r--+ 1 naoliv debian-med 37K 2008-02-13 08:20 bugs.php
-rw-rw-r--+ 1 naoliv debian-med 160K 2008-02-13 08:20 ddtp.php
$
What's the meaning of
Hi again!
2008/2/11 Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hum...
I created the compat file because I saw this message while building muscle:
dh_clean: Compatibility levels before 4 are deprecated.
But looking at the log there is an echo 5 debian/compat before it
starts to build (you can
Hi!
On Feb 11, 2008 10:46 AM, David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here it is talking about _documentation_ referring to latest compatibility
level. It does not say that CDBS uses the highest compatibility level
available. Or did I miss something?
On Feb 11, 2008 10:50 AM, Andreas Tille
Hi!
On Feb 11, 2008 10:16 AM, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
Actually, I tend to remove debian/compat in the packages using CDBS,
because in that case it uses the highest value available, thus solving
the backporting issues.
Ah, this is
Hi!
On Feb 11, 2008 9:51 AM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Nelson, thank you for the upload.
You are welcome.
Actually, I tend to remove debian/compat in the packages using CDBS,
because in that case it uses the highest value available, thus solving
the backporting issues.
Hi Charles!
On Feb 9, 2008 7:24 AM, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have packaged a new upstream release of muscle, a program for multiple
sequence alignment. It fixes a building bug when GCC 4.3 is used, and as
for mustang, the name of the upstream tarball was not changed for this
Hi!
On Feb 6, 2008 4:23 PM, Morten Kjeldgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/02/2008, at 16.37, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Agreed? :-)
Heh, not quite actually... :-)
That's good ;-)
The way I've done it is apply upstreams patches via the dpatch system
to the old tarball. When
Hi!
On Feb 6, 2008 6:08 PM, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
I keep my old tarball + patch = 3.0-1, new tarball = 3.0+p1-1 :-)
But lets see what the other members of the list have to say, right?
IMHO both things (old tarball + patch
Hi!
On Feb 6, 2008 9:06 PM, Morten Kjeldgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06/02/2008, at 20.19, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
You need to use 3.0+p1 only if you use the new tarball.
With the old one the version will be 3.0 only.
Of course! It makes absolutely sense! 3.0 it is! I applied
Hi!
On Feb 6, 2008 11:12 PM, Morten Kjeldgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch file applies without problems to tarball 883bd...etc... so
that is the one we should build against. I simply wrapped the
patchfile patch_15Jan2008.mustang with a dpatch header and called
it 01-upstream.dpatch.
Hi!
On Feb 5, 2008 6:49 AM, Morten Kjeldgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no new tarball. There's only a patch file on upstream's web
site that can be applied to the old tarball. I've wrapped that into
a dpatch, so it is necessary to mark that in the version number I
think. Version
Hi Morten!
On Feb 4, 2008 10:36 AM, Morten Kjeldgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, the sources have been patched with a patch from upstream.
Unfortunately, upstream has not changed the version number.
Therefore, the patch level has been added to the release. I don't
know if this is in
Hi!
On Jan 31, 2008 2:22 AM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the full changelog. Can somebody upload the package ?
Yep :-)
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
I don't know if somebody saw this, but we have been cited on
http://lwn.net/Articles/266712/
It's a subscriber-only content (Debian Developers who are part of the
Debian Project group at LWN can read it). On day 31 it will be open
for everyone.
It's a small note, but we are there (sorry if
Hi Charles!
On Jan 27, 2008 11:39 PM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you know I made a typo that makes the packages uploaded with
XS-DM-Upload-Allowed: Yes unavailable for DM upload (it should be 'yes',
in lower case). I just corrected this in our SVN.
Hum... maybe a wishlist bug
Hi Morten!
On Jan 11, 2008 2:59 PM, Morten Kjeldgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding mustang, it is lintian clean, it just works, and I do consider
it ready for upload. (Of course I can't promise it's without bugs, but the
program has been available through Ubuntu 7.10 for some months now,
Hi Charles!
On Jan 10, 2008 9:53 PM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 08:47:32AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
The package names are:
- embassy-domainatrix
- embassy-domalign
I forgot to say that they need emboss 5.0.0-3 to pbuild correctly. In the
Hi again!
On Jan 10, 2008 9:57 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
embassy-domainatrix is failing to build here (and I am using latest emboss):
Could you verify my commit?
It seems to build fine now, but I have doubt if it's libgd2-noxpm-dev
or libgd2-xpm-dev
Best regards
Hi!
On Jan 10, 2008 10:29 PM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, if we open ITPs, then we should wait a few days for feedback
before uploading. But these packages are small and not so complex; I
think that we can proceed without ITPs.
So both uploaded :-)
Thank you!
Best regards,
Hi Charles!
On Dec 29, 2007 4:07 PM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I have fixed bug 457921, in which binary-indep was also
producing binary-arch packages, and vice versa. The fix is not elegant,
so if somebody know a better way, please tell me ! Here is the
changelog, and
Hi David!
On Dec 24, 2007 1:38 PM, David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to file a bug to some_package for adding a License: field to the
binary sections (I mean those that shows up with apt-cache show foo). That
would help automated scripts, like ours. Where should I file that?
Hi David!
On Dec 15, 2007 11:00 PM, David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
could someone please upload proda (1.0-4) for me? It closes #455269 (FTBFS
gcc4.3)... I wish I already was a DM... :@
Uploaded.
I have fixed the missing quint in B-D and also updated to Standards
Version 3.7.3
Hi!
On Dec 7, 2007 9:04 AM, Steffen Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I admit to like it. With some more skills and gimp-time I'd probably go for
the snake to swirl around the Debian swirl and thus demonstrate that one no
longer needs that rod.
Something like that?
Hi!
I want to advocate Charles (with GPG key 0xBAFEC7F2) as a DM, while he
waits his account to be created.
I have sponsored some of his packages and he does a superb job
maintaining packages [1] and helping Debian-med.
[1]http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
Hi!
On Nov 20, 2007 11:52 AM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remind you that no file in this package is non-free. The LaTeX sources
of the documentation are lacking, but the PDF. PS, and html files
themeselves are originally distributed under the LGPL.
I understand.
And I have
Hi Charles!
On Nov 19, 2007 1:24 PM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have prepared a new version of dialign-t in which I rm-rf'ed the doc
directory (I am pessimistic on the outcome of the discussion on -devel,
which already digressed into an interesting debate about embedded
fonts).
Hi Charles!
On Nov 18, 2007 1:23 PM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I reverted the patch responsible for this. Although the bug is not
reported in the BTS, I reproduced it. Can somebody upload the version in
the SVN ?
By the way, can somebody upload dialign-t ? I think that we
Hi Charles!
On Nov 14, 2007 2:27 AM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Os is much better than O0, and the temporary loss of performance is in
my opinion acceptable.
Very good!
Do you want that I upload it?
And I don't know if you already thought on this, but maybe dialign-t
could be
Hi!
On Nov 14, 2007 9:42 AM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:26:37AM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit :
And I don't know if you already thought on this, but maybe dialign-t
could be split into dialign-t and dialign-t-data (lintian says that
98
Hi!
On Nov 14, 2007 12:41 PM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do not hesitate to send the diff uncompressed when it is so small :)
Right :-)
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, dialign-t-data
(=${source:Version})
Actually,
Hi again!
On Nov 14, 2007 12:55 PM, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Charles Plessy wrote:
although I do not expect users to decide to install one without the
other. But now I wonder if this fits the renewed interpretation of what
Recommends: means, now that
Hi Charles!
On Nov 12, 2007 10:54 PM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:32:20PM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit :
(...)
gcc -Wall -g -O2 -c -o prob.o prob.c
prob.c: In function 'calc_score_dist':
prob.c:157: warning: 'sq1' is used uninitialized
Hi again!
On Nov 13, 2007 8:34 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It builds fine if using -O0
Do you want to use -O0 temporarily and upload it?
With -Os it also builds fine (-O1 fails)
-Os is better than nothing (-O0)
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi Charles!
On Nov 12, 2007 12:07 PM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that ftp-master is up again, I think that emboss-explorer desserves
an update.
This one I have uploaded.
I have also prepared a new package for dialign-t, a multiple alignment
software. Dialign-t does not
Hi again!
On 11/5/07, Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/4/07, David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A bug has already been issued: I've added a comment that happens to our
repository too:
http://code.google.com/p/cia-vc/issues/detail?id=2
Actually revisions 756
Hi!
Below you will see the output of a (very ugly but functional) script that I
will run weekly. It will gets latest changelogs and watch files from SVN
and verify if we already have the latest upstream version.
Up to date packages won't be displayed.
What do you think? Suggestions, critics,
Hi!
On 11/4/07, Karsten Hilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not quite:
* gnumed-client: new version available (.0.1-rc5 0.2.7.0)
Probably caused by a wrong watch file.
See:
$ uscan --report-status
Processing watchfile line for package gnumed-client...
Newest version on remote site is
Hi Charles!
On 10/13/07, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prepared a package for DIALIGN-T, which is needed by the meta-aligner
functions of T-Coffee (m_coffee, dm_coffee). You can find it either in
our SVN, or on mentors.d.o:
Hum...
(...)
gcc -Wall -g -O2 -c -o prob.o prob.c
Hi!
On 10/13/07, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not being a DD, I still need somebody to do the upload (please use
dch-r before...). But I have resumed my work on TS2, and I hope that I
can send it to my application manager soon.
Uploading right now.
Thank you, Charles!
Best
Hi!
On 10/12/07, David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's what happened: when Nelson committed the pt_* translations, he modified
the permissions of the whole website. It has not been a conscious action,
but
a consequence of the post-commit hook.
Mi scusi.
Sorry for this trouble and
On 10/12/07, David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've added a umask 002 line to the update-website script. This *should*
ensure the correct umask while updating the website. I'd need a test commit
from someone who didn't set his umask yet (Nelson?). In any case, if this
doesn't work (and
Hi David!
On 9/30/07, David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's ready for an upload. ;)
It is :-)
Uploaded.
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi David!
Uploaded emboss-explorer.
Thank you for your work!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
