Hi!
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Steffen Möller wrote:
> For the future, is there a way to have some bits not forwarded?
> Or to have them only selectively forwarded? Well, the mailing
> list, probably.
You can tag the posts and have a RSS (for that specific tag) that will
be published in P
Hi!
After updating sofa-framework (both the build-deps for the new
libqwt-dev and an include path) I can't pass this:
http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/sofa-framework_1.0~beta4-6_i386.build.txt
Any ideas/suggestion/patches? :-)
Latest debian/ dir is in our SVN.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nel
Hi!
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Dominique Belhachemi
wrote:
> It still doesn't work for me. All I get is the following error message:
Can you ssh directly to the host?
Are you using VerifyHostKeyDNS in your ~/.ssh/config for Debian hosts?
"ssh -v svn.debian.org" can give us more info (you
Hi Dominique!
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Dominique Belhachemi
wrote:
> Does the following description work for anyone since the changes on alioth?
For SVN it works:
svn co svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/
For git:
git clone git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/package.g
Hi!
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Scott Cain wrote:
> E: Internal Error, Could not perform immediate configuration (2) on
> perl-modules
It seems to be http://bugs.debian.org/548848,
http://bugs.debian.org/548860 and others
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ..
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> If I did it right, it should appear as "Debian Med"
Already updated. It's there! :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> As a planet.d.o ignorant I can not give good advise here. If the usual
> Blogs are issued by *persons* the "Debian Med Team" is probably matching
> this person-approach. If also *projects* are posting there any of the
> above suggestion
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> The name that will appear on Planet is better as "Debian Med" or
> "Debian in Biology and Medicine"?
Or "Debian Med Team" or a better name :-)
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> BTW, is there anybody who might care for including the Debian Med blog
> into planet.debian.org?
The name that will appear on Planet is better as "Debian Med" or
"Debian in Biology and Medicine"?
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira
wrote:
> Am I missing something or it's lack of caffeine?
As always, the problem is the stupid user :-)
It seems that files were locked due to an interrupted "svn update"
(thus needing a "svn cleanup")
B
Hi!
I did a new checkout from our SVN repository (svn checkout
svn+ssh://nao...@svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk) to update
raster3d but I saw that all files are locked.
Am I missing something or it's lack of caffeine?
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med
Hi!
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Thorsten Alteholz
wrote:
> There are about 1800 files to be checked.
> Are there any tools to make this task a bit easier?
licensecheck (from the devscripts package) can help you, but it's
still highly recommended to manually review all the files (there are
c
Hi!
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Thorsten Alteholz
wrote:
> PS: Does anybody know of problems with alioth? All my connections are
> refused. Wouldn't this be a nice opportunity for a tweet?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-infrastructure-announce/2011/05/msg0.html
;-)
Best regards,
Nelso
Hi!
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Nicolas Barbier
wrote:
> Patch for paper-text.tex attached.
I have commited your changes, thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Michael Hanke wrote:
> I committed another set of changes, but then started to conflict with
> 'naoliv' and stopped for now. When is the final deadline?
Sorry :-(
I did finish the typos that I found, however, so there won't be any
more conflicts caused by me.
B
Hi Steffen!
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Steffen Möller wrote:
> Hi Gregor, have many thanks! I'll upload later tonight.
Note that on i386, kfreebsd-i386 and hurd-i386 it should be patched to
don't use SSE too.
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2010/09/msg00062.html
Best regards,
Nels
Hi Misha!
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:06 PM, misha680 wrote:
> Here is a link to the uploaded package:
> http://www.2shared.com/file/SeV8AGVg/openmrs_161-1_all.html
The binary packages (.deb files) aren't usefull for review. We need
the .dsc, .orig.tar.gz (or .orig.tar.bz2) and the .diff.gz
(.deb
Hi again!
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Still about the compiler flags for hmmer (#594860), on i386 [1] and
> kfreebsd-i386 [2] it's being used the SSE implementation (compiled
> with -msse2).
Also on hurd-i386 (from https://buildd.debian.org/stat
Hi!
Still about the compiler flags for hmmer (#594860), on i386 [1] and
kfreebsd-i386 [2] it's being used the SSE implementation (compiled
with -msse2).
While it's almost sure that people who use hmmer have processors >=
Pentium 4 and Athlon 64, there is still a small probability that some
users
Hi Steffen!
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Steffen Möller wrote:
> this has fixed the first problem. Now another one surfaced.
Now it should be clean it seems.
Can you retest it only to confirm, please?
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Hi Steffen!
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Steffen Möller wrote:
> It is the very same, still. I think it is just the … that it
> complains about.
Removed all the ellipsis entries (they weren't necessary, but indeed
it would be better to use … instead …)
Can you do a new test?
Best regards,
Ne
Hi!
(It wasn't me who broke it)
It works nicely here on Chomium, Opera and Iceweasel.
But indeed, it fails to validate with the W3C validator.
I have removed one php close tag (that was wrong).
Steffen, can you see if it still fails on Firefox, please?
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi!
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> /usr/include/c++/4.5/bits/stl_uninitialized.h: In function 'void
> std::__uninitialized_construct_range(_ForwardIterator, _ForwardIterator,
> _Tp&)':
> /usr/include/c++/4.5/bits/stl_uninitialized.h:231: error: a function call
> cann
Hi!
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Ah, if the pdfs were generated from the source then that is OK and is my
> mistake. The lut files sound OK too. If those were the only two binary file
> types, we should be OK, just re-upload and I will fast-track it.
Just a suggesti
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:
> Does anyone knows if there is something particular going on with NEW
> package ? dicomscope/pixelmed have not been uploaded (submitted ~3
> weeks ago).
Actually it can take months (so 3 week is normal) to new packages be
processed. It o
Hi!
While fixing the watch file of phyml, I saw that its version number in
debian/changelog is 200900706 while upstream version is 20090706
(there is one more zero on our version number).
Is this a typo?
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Hi!
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Great; thanks! I have been tracking full history in a private svn
> repository, so I'll be wanting to convert that to git; any tips on
> doing so?
See the package git-svn
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-
Hi!
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Eric MAEKER wrote:
> But 'svn checkout svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk' ask me to
> type a password and does not reconize it.
It seems that you are missing your username:
svn co svn+ssh://ericmaeker-gu...@svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/
Hi!
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Mathieu
Malaterre wrote:
> nawk: cannot open "/dev/tty" for output (No such device or address)
Wild guess is that it's a problem with awk.
Take a look at http://www.gnu.org/manual/gawk/html_node/Special-FD.html
It seems to be caused by how awk is using the red
Hi!
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Mathieu
Malaterre wrote:
> I am looking at the list file contained in dicom3tools and it seems
> I am missing the binaries (dciodvfy, dctable...) !
>
> I tried duplicating the issue here but I cannot (*). Is there an
> issue with the shell script in rules file
Hi!
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Mathieu
Malaterre wrote:
> I am starring at the puiparts right now, I have been reading the FAQ
> but I still do not understand what this means:
>
> http://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/d/dicom3tools.html
>
> Could someone please let me know what the actual p
Hi!
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Mathieu
Malaterre wrote:
> Could someone let me know what is happening.
> (...)
> Rejected: md5sum for
> /srv/ftp.debian.org/queue/new/dicom3tools_1.0~20090716.orig.tar.gz
> doesn't match dicom3tools_1.0~20090716-2.dsc.
Probably you are using a different gzip v
Hi!
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> The package is still in NEW, but I believe you can make a second
> upload of the same revision and it will be overwritten. If that
> doesn't work, you can definitely make a revision -2 upload; both will
> appear in the NEW queue and s
Hi!
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Mathieu
Malaterre wrote:
>> It seems that since I rename pvrg into pvrg-jpeg, the ITP is not being
>> taken into account properly...
>> Do I need to do something ?
>
> Hum, I realize that pvrg-jpeg was uploaded as experimental maybe this
> is why the ITP is not
Hi!
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Mathieu
Malaterre wrote:
> Everything should have been taken care of.
Uploaded, with some fixes too
(http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-commit/2009-August/003853.html).
Thank you.
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-
Hi!
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Mathieu
Malaterre wrote:
> Should be all done. I tried compiling with gcc-snapshot and it
> compiled ok (tons of warnings though).
Just committed two small fixes and uploaded it.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...
Hi!
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:47 AM, wrote:
> dicom3tools is now completely lintian clean from warning. Anyone to sponsor
> the upload ?
Almost :-)
Still needs to see:
W: dicom3tools source: dh-clean-k-is-deprecated
W: dicom3tools source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.0 (current is 3.8.2)
Hi!
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:16:46PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
>> in the sake of our group maintenance I want to inform you about a somewhat
>> unusual
>> post-inst message that I had added to the autodock package, toinform the
>> use
Hi!
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Mathieu
Malaterre wrote:
> Could someone (a DD) please review my dicom3tools package. Lintian
> does not report any error anymore now.
There are some warnings when checking the version on svn (with
debian/changelog entry from Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:58:37)
See t
Hi Charles!
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> we have a patch in the Debian package mummer for which we lost origin and
> detailed description. I would like to forward it upstream, but I would prefer
> to know what it does before ;) Would somebody have a few minutes to throw
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Mathieu
Malaterre wrote:
> Could someone please sponsor the pvrg package, I have cleanup the
> remaining lintian issues.
Not fully clean :-)
See the attached lintian output.
Wouldn't it be better to have the source package and the binary
package as "pvrg-jpe
Hi Mathieu!
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:
> Modified: trunk/packages/gdcm/trunk/debian/control
> ===
> --- trunk/packages/gdcm/trunk/debian/control 2009-05-29 05:26:09 UTC (rev
> 3445)
> +++ trunk/pac
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
>
>> This link might be of interest .
>>
>> https://svn.opensourcery.com/public/elementalclinic/trunk/docs/DEBIAN
>>
>> from packaging perspective.
>
> At least not for me because I can not
Hi!
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Scott Christley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think biococoa and sequenceconverter.app are ready for upload!
biococoa is failing to build:
$ pdebuild
dpkg-buildpackage: set CFLAGS to default value: -g -O2
dpkg-buildpackage: set CPPFLAGS to default value:
dpk
Hi!
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 8:54 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Added:
> trunk/packages/mustang/trunk/debian/patches/04-gcc-4.3-exit
> Modified:
> trunk/packages/mustang/trunk/debian/changelog
> trunk/packages/mustang/trunk/debian/control
> trunk/packages/mustang/trunk/debian/patches/00l
Hi!
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:52 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Description: maps short fixed-legth polymporphic DNA sequence reads to
> reference sequences
> +Description: maps short fixed-legth polymorphic DNA sequence reads to
> reference sequences
Isn't it fixed-length? (missing a N)
B
Hi!
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically what I did was to disable the building of local zlib, include
> the zlib.h from /usr/include instead of the local one, and add -lm and
> -lz to CFLAGS from CDBS. Any idea what -lm and -lz mean?
You are lin
Hi David!
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:11 AM, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've done some "maintainance" on proda [1] -- I believe it could be uploaded
> for
> a "maintainance revision".
Uploaded, thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Hi my friends!
I am sending this message to you because I know that I need to (or will
have to) answer/read some of your messages /do something for you.
The problem is: I was at the hospital for 8 days (surgery). Before this
I was really bad too. So for sure I have a lot of messages to reply,
real
Ha! :-D
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is a great day for me and I would like to give a big THANK YOU to
> everybody who made it possible. Special thanks to Andreas Tille, my
> advocate, Christoph Berg, my AM, and Anìbal Monsalve Salazar, my fi
Hi!
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The watch file informs the Debian maintainer about new upstream versions.
> I have to admit that I failed to get a notice about new upstream versions
> for packages I would like to watch. I know that I could run us
Hi!
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, it is probably a missing build dep. I will investigate this
> tomorrow.
Was missing libtie-ixhash-perl :-)
I have added it, commited on SVN and uploaded the package.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To
Hi!
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is in our SVN repo with a watch file for you to upload the original
> sources. I am still not yet a DD, so I need somebody to sponsor this
> pacakge to NEW.
It seems that almost every test is failing here (and
Hi!
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:24 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [HELP] Added watch file but this does not work. :-(( Any clue?
It's working here:
$ uscan --report-status
Processing watchfile line for package epcr...
Newest version on remote site is 2.3.9, local version is 1.2.0
epcr: Newer v
Hi!
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My pbuilder is borken and I had no time to learn sbuild. Can somebody
> upload bioperl? The main changes are:
Somebody has uploaded it :-)
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Hi!
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried to add a watch file to clustalw-mpi, but did not manage to make
> one that works. Can somebody have a look? I am affraid that the problem
> is trivial but I am blind to it.
You missed "./" :-)
> If this i
Hi!
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What shall we do for the mailing lists? Just delete? I do not mind this
> but I do not feel like taking the decision alone.
I agree with whatever you choose ;-)
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Charles!
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The clustalw package is ready for upload. There has been a new upstream
> release this week, in which a new option has been introduced
> (-fullhelp). Also, Clustal packages have a new home, www.clustal.org.
Hi Charles!
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:51 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Log:
> Bumped copyrights to 2008
I have already uploaded it :-(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Daniel Leidert wrote:
>
> > - very important: grep for License, Copyright and Public Domain strings
> > to make sure, your debian/copyright is complete - incomplete
> > debian/copyright are most
Hi!
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> > If I did everything correctly, they are ready to be uploaded (and I
> > will upload them after one more review). Please, see if there i
Hi!
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Charles Plessy
> > clustalx is ready, but clustalw is not yet lintian-clean. Nevertheless,
> > clustalx will have to go to NEW, so I guess it will not hurt if it is
> > uploaded a bit before clustalw.
Hum... directly on incoming :-)
Nelson
--
To UN
Hi Charles!
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> clustalx is ready, but clustalw is not yet lintian-clean. Nevertheless,
> clustalx will have to go to NEW, so I guess it will not hurt if it is
> uploaded a bit before clustalw.
Uploaded. I just hope that
Hi!
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:33 AM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a new upstream release of primer3 that fixes a bug reported in
> Ubuntu (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/primer3/+bug/191053).
There.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>
> > Give me one week and I will commit gff2ps, gff2aplot, gdpc, raster3d,
> > biofox and biosquid to our repository.
>
> OK, one wee
Hi!
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Uploading clustalw (only building clustalw) and clustalx (only
> > building clustalx), both as 1.83-4 will do the job as I can see (and
> > won't cause any problems).
> > There is no problem in not uploading a
Hi!
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why not only use 1.83-4? It will replace the one already available.
>
> It is a new package, I do not know if it would work… Doesn't it need to
> end by -1? Otherwise, this would be obviously the thing to do.
Up
Hi Charles!
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have just one doubt about the process: there are already binary
> > packages for clustalx 1.83 in non-free. Will they be overwritten or will
> > they cause a problem?
>
> Actually, I think that the bes
Hi!
On Feb 18, 2008 6:01 AM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another issues are biosquid and clustalw-mpi - could we start
> Group maintenance here? I'm also personally guilty for some
> packages not yet in the SVN reporitory - I'm working on it.
Give me one week and I will commit gff
Hi!
On Feb 13, 2008 5:20 AM, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SSHing, and checking, here's what happened:
>
> $ ls -lah bugs.php ddtp.php
> -rw-rw-r--+ 1 naoliv debian-med 37K 2008-02-13 08:20 bugs.php
> -rw-rw-r--+ 1 naoliv debian-med 160K 2008-02-13 08:20 ddtp.php
> $
>
> What's the m
Hi again!
2008/2/11 Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hum...
> I created the compat file because I saw this message while building muscle:
>
> dh_clean: Compatibility levels before 4 are deprecated.
>
> But looking at the log there is an "echo 5 >debi
Hi!
On Feb 11, 2008 10:46 AM, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here it is talking about _documentation_ referring to latest compatibility
> level. It does not say that CDBS uses the highest compatibility level
> available. Or did I miss something?
On Feb 11, 2008 10:50 AM, Andreas Tille
Hi!
On Feb 11, 2008 10:40 AM, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Il giorno Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:51:25 +0900
> Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> > (By the way, I am swiching a lot of packages to CDBS; if it is an issue,
> > I am of course open to discussion. I am usually doi
Hi!
On Feb 11, 2008 10:16 AM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > Actually, I tend to remove debian/compat in the packages using CDBS,
> > because in that case it uses the highest value available, thus solving
> > the backporting issues.
>
>
Hi!
On Feb 11, 2008 9:51 AM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Nelson, thank you for the upload.
You are welcome.
> Actually, I tend to remove debian/compat in the packages using CDBS,
> because in that case it uses the highest value available, thus solving
> the backporting issues.
Hi Charles!
On Feb 9, 2008 7:24 AM, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have packaged a new upstream release of muscle, a program for multiple
> sequence alignment. It fixes a building bug when GCC 4.3 is used, and as
> for mustang, the name of the upstream tarball was not changed for th
Hi!
On Feb 6, 2008 11:12 PM, Morten Kjeldgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patch file applies without problems to tarball 883bd...etc... so
> that is the one we should build against. I simply wrapped the
> patchfile "patch_15Jan2008.mustang" with a dpatch header and called
> it 01-upstream.dp
Hi!
On Feb 6, 2008 9:06 PM, Morten Kjeldgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 06/02/2008, at 20.19, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>
> > You need to use 3.0+p1 only if you use the new tarball.
> > With the old one the version will be 3.0 only.
>
> Of course! It makes
Hi!
On Feb 6, 2008 6:08 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>
> > I keep my "old tarball + patch = 3.0-1, new tarball = 3.0+p1-1" :-)
> > But lets see what the other members of the list have to say
Hi!
On Feb 6, 2008 4:23 PM, Morten Kjeldgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 05/02/2008, at 16.37, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> > Agreed? :-)
>
> Heh, not quite actually... :-)
That's good ;-)
> The way I've done it is apply upstreams patches via the dpatch
Hi!
On Feb 5, 2008 6:49 AM, Morten Kjeldgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no new tarball. There's only a patch file on upstream's web
> site that can be applied to the "old" tarball. I've wrapped that into
> a dpatch, so it is necessary to mark that in the version number I
> think. Vers
Hi Morten!
On Feb 4, 2008 10:36 AM, Morten Kjeldgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, the sources have been patched with a patch from upstream.
> Unfortunately, upstream has not changed the version number.
> Therefore, the patch level has been added to the release. I don't
> know if this is in
Hi!
On Jan 31, 2008 2:22 AM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is the full changelog. Can somebody upload the package ?
Yep :-)
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Charles!
On Jan 29, 2008 12:30 PM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steffen and I have packaged glam2, a motif-detection software for
> biological sequences. For this package, I have made use of CDBS, so that
> debian/rules is trivial. I had to patch the manpages to let them accept
>
Hi again!
I saw now that there is a nice mechanism to generate an URL of a
subscriber only article, so people can read it:
http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/266712/b62a713379dc92f1/
Good reading.
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Hi people!
2008/1/29 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> as you might have seen, r1213 introduces a "Group Policy". As many other teams
> have one, I felt the need of writing one for us. Consider it still a draft
> (anyone knows Foo Bar? ;) ), it can be improved in many ways.
Good!
> Suggestion
Hi!
I don't know if somebody saw this, but we have been cited on
http://lwn.net/Articles/266712/
It's a subscriber-only content (Debian Developers who are part of the
Debian Project group at LWN can read it). On day 31 it will be open
for everyone.
It's a small note, but we are there (sorry if t
Hi Charles!
On Jan 27, 2008 11:39 PM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As you know I made a typo that makes the packages uploaded with
> XS-DM-Upload-Allowed: Yes unavailable for DM upload (it should be 'yes',
> in lower case). I just corrected this in our SVN.
Hum... maybe a wishlist
Hi!
On Jan 12, 2008 1:11 AM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 12, 2008 12:13 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > And I was thinking if it's not better to use /tmp/mustang (instead
> > > only mustang) in
Hi!
On Jan 12, 2008 6:22 AM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In addition, the packaging has been extensively tidied by me, Nelson and
> David, and the upload would fix a Debian bug (the nostrip option was not
> handled).
Extensively only applies to Charles and David ;-)
> Can somebod
On Jan 12, 2008 12:13 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I was thinking if it's not better to use /tmp/mustang (instead
> only mustang) in debian/runtest and debian/patches/test_zf-cchh.dpatch
^^^
Instead only /tmp, sorry
Nelson
--
To U
Hi Morten!
On Jan 11, 2008 2:59 PM, Morten Kjeldgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Regarding mustang, it is lintian clean, it "just works", and I do consider
> it ready for upload. (Of course I can't promise it's without bugs, but the
> program has been available through Ubuntu 7.10 for some month
Hi!
On Jan 10, 2008 10:29 PM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, if we open ITPs, then we should wait a few days for feedback
> before uploading. But these packages are small and not so complex; I
> think that we can proceed without ITPs.
So both uploaded :-)
Thank you!
Best rega
Hi again!
On Jan 10, 2008 9:57 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> embassy-domainatrix is failing to build here (and I am using latest emboss):
Could you verify my commit?
It seems to build fine now, but I have doubt if it's libgd2-noxpm-dev
or libgd2-xpm-dev
Hi Charles!
On Jan 10, 2008 9:53 PM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 08:47:32AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> >
> > The package names are:
> > - embassy-domainatrix
> > - embassy-domalign
>
> I forgot to say that they need emboss 5.0.0-3 to pbuild correctl
Hi Charles!
On Jan 10, 2008 11:10 AM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I took the opportunity to tidy it a bit, and to transfer it to
> Debian-Med. Can somebody upload it? Here is the changelog:
Uploaded.
Thank you for your work!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
Hi again!
On Jan 4, 2008 2:05 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Charles!
>
> On Jan 4, 2008 2:03 PM, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I got a bug report this morning: probcons ships a broken version of the
> > probcons-RNA pr
Hi Charles!
On Jan 4, 2008 2:03 PM, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got a bug report this morning: probcons ships a broken version of the
> probcons-RNA program. I corrected the problem in our SVN. Can somebody
> upload the package ? It also contain other improvements:
Just a moment
Hi Charles!
On Dec 29, 2007 4:07 PM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I have fixed bug 457921, in which binary-indep was also
> producing binary-arch packages, and vice versa. The fix is not elegant,
> so if somebody know a better way, please tell me ! Here is the
> changelog, a
Hi David!
On Dec 24, 2007 1:38 PM, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to file a bug to for adding a License: field to the
> binary sections (I mean those that shows up with "apt-cache show foo"). That
> would help automated scripts, like ours. Where should I file that?
dpkg
But
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
