Dear Karsten,
Well, once Orthanc 1.2 shows up in my sources.lst I will test
the suggested script and report back. Since I don't assume
Orthanc 1.1 -> 1.2 to actually need a database upgrade (?) I
expect the script to gracefully do nothing.
Indeed, an upgrade of the Orthanc database is only
thanks for your preparation. I've uploaded after moving packaging to
Git since the original tarball was changed.
Great, thanks!
Regards,
Sébastien-
Dear all,
Last Saturday, the Orthanc project released initial support of DICOM for
whole-slide microscopic imaging (digital pathology) [1]. This
implementation tries and follows Supplement 145 [2].
The implementation notably provides a command-line tool to convert
whole-slide images to
OK, it has just been accepted ;)
Sébastien-
On 07/11/2016 08:12 AM, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Would it be possible that there was a problem with the upload? It seems
that the 1.1.0+dfsg-2 version is not available yet on unstable.
Thanks for your support,
Sébastien-
On 07/09
Hi Andreas,
Would it be possible that there was a problem with the upload? It seems
that the 1.1.0+dfsg-2 version is not available yet on unstable.
Thanks for your support,
Sébastien-
On 07/09/2016 01:36 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Uploaded and tagged (sorry for missing to push and tag
work on this, Andreas.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 04:59:22PM +0200, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
Dear all,
I have just packaged the newest upstream version of Orthanc (1.1.0):
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/orthanc.git/
Could someone check the package and upload it if everything is OK? Thanks
n-med?view=revision=22235
[2] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/orthanc-dicomweb.git/
On 06/27/2016 11:16 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Uploaded, thanks for your work on this, Andreas.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 04:59:22PM +0200, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
Dear all,
I have just packaged
Dear all,
I have just packaged the newest upstream version of Orthanc (1.1.0):
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/orthanc.git/
Could someone check the package and upload it if everything is OK?
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Sébastien-
Hello,
Thus my personal rule
is: If tarball is not identical to download move to Git for packaging.
[...]
For me the move is not urgent if the issue above is no real problem for
you.
OK, so I propose to move the package to Git.
I don't know how to do the move by myself (as I'm not a Debian
On 04/18/2016 02:43 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Uploaded and tagged. Please tell me if the packaging should be moved to Git.
Great, thanks again!
Regarding the move to Git, I personally do not have any preference.
Maybe we could keep it in Subversion as long as possible to avoid any
Hello,
I have just updated the "orthanc-imagej" package with the latest
upstream version [1].
Andreas, as usual, would it be possible for you to sponsor it?
Regards,
Sébastien-
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/orthanc-imagej/trunk/debian/?sortby=date#dirlist
Dear all,
When I try and run the ImageJ package from Debian Sid, I currently get
the following crash:
>
jodogne@unstable:~$ rm -rf .imagej
jodogne@unstable:~$ imagej
Open other images in this ImageJ panel as follows:
imagej -p 1 [ ... ]
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java
Dear all,
The Orthanc package is currently affected by two deficiencies in the
google-glog package: The one reported below, plus another one that reads
as follows [1]:
/usr/bin/c++ -DBOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION=3 -DBOOST_HAS_DATE_TIME=1
-DBOOST_HAS_FILESYSTEM_V3=1 -DBOOST_HAS_LOCALE=1
Hi all,
After updating my development PC from Ubuntu 12.10 to Ubuntu 14.10 LTS,
I have observed a very severe degradation in the performance of
storescp from the DCMTK package.
Sending 100 DICOM files to storescp took 25 seconds instead of less than
2 seconds in my previous version of
Hi,
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/orthanc-postgresql/trunk/debian/
OK, works for me.
For reasons of clarity I would
a) point out that one can use any name for user and database
as long as reality and configuration match
b) use the names orthanc_db and
Hi Andreas,
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med?view=revisionrevision=18929
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med?view=revisionrevision=18930
Could you please also add a new d/changelog paragraph matching these
changes since the package was uploaded before?
Sorry for
Dear all,
I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest upstream
version of Orthanc (0.8.6) [1].
Andreas, if the package looks OK to you, please would you kindly upload
it? Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
Sébastien-
[1]
to override a newer upstream
version we simply leave the unstable - testing queue free from new
versions ... at least for some time.
Hope this explanation was enlightening and thanks again
Andreas.
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 05:34:25PM +0100, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
Dear all,
I have just
Dear all,
I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest upstream
version of Orthanc (0.8.5) [1]. Orthanc is a lightweight, scriptable
DICOM server for healthcare and medical research [2].
Andreas, if the package looks OK to you, please would you kindly upload
it to unstable?
Hello,
I have just submitted an important patch to the Orthanc 0.8.4 package,
that prevents Orthanc from crashing if bad credentials are provided in a
HTTP request, when authentication is enabled [1].
Andreas, please would you kindly upload it?
Thanks!
Sébastien-
[1]
Hi Iain,
On 09/12/2014 05:27 PM, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
N: Processing source package orthanc (version 0.8.3+dfsg-1, arch source) ...
E: orthanc source: debian-upstream-obsolete-path debian/upstream
The path for this file changed. The new path is debian/upstream/metadata
where
Hi Andreas,
I have just upgraded the Orthanc package with the newest upstream
version (0.8.3) [1].
Unfortunately, Lintian reports some problems I am unable to fix by myself:
N: Processing source package orthanc (version 0.8.3+dfsg-1, arch source) ...
E: orthanc source:
Dear all,
I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest upstream
version of Orthanc (0.8.0) [1]. Orthanc is a lightweight, scriptable
DICOM server for healthcare and medical research [2].
Andreas, if the package looks OK to you, please would you kindly upload
it to unstable?
for these issues.
Sincerely,
Sébastien-
[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med?view=revisionrevision=17174
On 06/13/2014 01:24 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
thanks for your work on orthanc.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 03:14:02PM +0200, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
Dear all,
I have just
Dear all,
I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest upstream
version of Orthanc (0.7.6) [1,2].
Andreas, please would you kindly upload it to unstable? Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
Sébastien-
PS: Orthanc is a lightweight, scriptable DICOM server for healthcare and
medical
Dear all,
I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest upstream
version of Orthanc (0.7.5) [1,2].
Please would you kindly upload it to unstable? Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
Sébastien-
PS: Orthanc is a lightweight, scriptable DICOM server for healthcare and
medical research.
Dear all,
I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest upstream
version of Orthanc (0.7.4) [1,2].
Please would you kindly upload it to unstable? Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
Sébastien-
[1] https://www.orthanc-server.com/
[2]
=revisionrevision=16834
On 04/28/2014 02:39 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:05:32PM +0200, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
Dear all,
I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest
upstream version of Orthanc (0.7.4) [1,2].
Please would you kindly upload
,
Karsten
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:22:12AM +0100, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
Following the release of the new upstream version 0.7.3 of Orthanc, I
have tried and fix the bug #737448 of the Orthanc package
(Sourceless file (minified)) [1].
Please someone could review the current version
Thanks for the update! This seems to be directly related to a recent,
serious bug in the libboost1.54-dev package [1].
Andreas, how can I tag the fact that Orthanc is blocked by this bug with
the Debian QA tools?
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739904
OK, I have just
Dear all,
Following the release of the new upstream version 0.7.3 of Orthanc, I
have tried and fix the bug #737448 of the Orthanc package (Sourceless
file (minified)) [1].
Please someone could review the current version of the package [2] to
make sure that the reported problem is properly
Hi,
Thanks to Daigo's -2 of glog with suggested tune up of build-depends,
I have uploaded backport build of orthanc for wheezy straight into
NeuroDebian wheezy just to give it a try...
Fine! Could you give the link to the repository containing your backport?
Would it be possible for you to
Dear all,
Perhaps you could give a look at Orthanc [1], that is a lightweight
DICOM store that is built on the top of DCMTK, that is already packaged
into Debian [2], and that is known to work in combination with Ginkgo
CADx since release 0.7.0 [3].
The distribution of Orthanc contains a
This is your Jan 2013 answer to my inquiry on just that:
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 18:05:52 +0100
From: Sebastien Jodogne s.jodo...@chu.ulg.ac.be
To: debian-med@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Orthanc 0.5.0
Would you mind giving some hints as to best
I do not have this missing symbol problem on my Debian unstable box
(x86_64 architecture). It is defined by the shared library
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglog.so.0.0.0 from the
libgoogle-glog0 package (version 0.3.3-1).
Upgrading the package to the 0.3.3 unstable version fixed the
startup
Is there a way to run Orthanc withOUT it listening as a web server ?
(IOW as a pure DICOM server)
This is the first time this feature is requested. I have just added a
card in our roadmap to keep track of it [1]. This is a minor development
that I plan to ship in the next release of Orthanc.
Is there a way to run Orthanc withOUT it listening as a web server ?
(IOW as a pure DICOM server)
This is the first time this feature is requested. I have just added a
card in our roadmap to keep track of it [1]. This is a minor development
that I plan to ship in the next release of Orthanc.
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for your feedback! I have just fixed the package by
introducing a minimal version for Google Log [1].
Thanks for the quick fix. Perhaps it might make sense to send a bug
report to BTS anyway to let other potential users know and upload the
package fixing this bug.
Thanks
Hi Yaroslav,
On 01/13/2014 04:14 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Thank you for packaging orthanc -- it looks very interesting!
I wonder -- are there big showstoppers which would forbid its backport
for wheezy?
At some point (0.4.0 iirc) I have tried to build it for wheezy but then
got stuck
Hi Andreas and Yaroslav,
I was not able either to find a complete backporting handbook for
Debian Med packages: Andreas, is there such a guide available
somewhere?
I admit I'm quite lazy with backports and while I definitely think this
is a reasonable task I somehow consider it Somebody
Hi Andreas,
Following our discussion of this morning [1], I have just updated the
DebianMed repository with the newest upstream version of Orthanc (0.7.2)
[2]. This release includes an adaptation of the detect-endian.patch
from Adam Conrad [3], that has also been applied upstream [4]. So,
Dear all,
I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest upstream
version of Orthanc (0.6.1) [1,2]. Mathieu, please would you kindly
upload it to unstable? Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
Sébastien-
[1] https://code.google.com/p/orthanc/
[2]
Mathieu,
Would you care explaining why you reverted my change. I did document
in svn rev 14174 what I did. Furthermore to prevent anyone from
reverting it, I took additional steps and even left the comment:
remove build type, see #711515
Sorry about this. I had not understood that your
Dear all,
I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest upstream
version of Orthanc (0.6.0) [1,2]. Mathieu, please would you kindly
upload it to unstable? Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
Sébastien-
[1] https://code.google.com/p/orthanc/
[2]
I will upload orthanc with explicit reference to boost1.53, as
explained in #708109.
Thanks!
I'd appreciate if you could use DEP3 for patches, and I believe
-DDCMTK_LIBRARIES=wrap;oflog can go away now.
OK, I will pay attention to this for the next release.
Cheers,
Sébastien-
--
To
Dear all,
I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest upstream
version of Orthanc (0.5.2) [1,2]. Mathieu, please would you kindly
upload it to unstable? Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
Sébastien-
[1] https://code.google.com/p/orthanc/
[2]
Dear Andreas,
I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest upstream
version of Orthanc (0.5.1) [1]. Please would you kindly upload it to
unstable? Thanks in advance!
Would it be possible to associate Orthanc with the following BibTeX
citation on the Debian Med homepage [1]?
Dear all,
I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest upstream
version of Orthanc (0.5.1) [1]. Please would you kindly upload it to
unstable? Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
Sébastien-
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/orthanc/trunk/debian/
--
To
Dear all,
I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest upstream
version of Orthanc (0.5.0) [1]. Please would you kindly upload it to
experimental? Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
Sébastien-
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/orthanc/trunk/debian/
Dear Karsten,
Thank you for your interest in Orthanc!
does Orthanc allow DICOM clients (such as Ginkgo CADx) to
connect via the DICOM API (C-STORE etc) ?
The status of the features of the various versions of Orthanc is
summarized in a quick reference table [1]. This table means that Orthanc
Salut Mathieu,
what does this new version brings/fixes ? does it fixes current FTBFS ref:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=orthanc
I have just uploaded a patch [1] that is meant to support the platforms
for which the DownloadPackage CMake subscript fails (hurd-i386,
Andreas,
BTW, do you intend to provide a doc package to fix
http://bugs.debian.org/693959
I may seem stupid, but I was not aware of the existence of the bug
tracking page for Orthanc in Debian Med [1]... thank you for pointing it
to me, and please excuse my non-answering to these
Would you mind giving some hints as to best
configure Ginkgo CADx
apt-get install ginkgocadx
such that it will nicely interface with ORTHANC ?
As written in my previous answer, Orthanc does not currently support the
PACS Q/R feature of Ginkgo CADx, because Orthanc does not implement
at the current state of
orthanc in debian buildd machines:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=orthanc
Thanks !
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Sebastien Jodogne
s.jodo...@chu.ulg.ac.be wrote:
Dear Andreas and Mathieu,
The Orthanc 0.2.2-1 package has just been accepted into unstable [1
Dear all,
I have just released a new version of Orthanc (0.2.3) with several
improvements [1]. I have updated the trunk of the DebianMed project
accordingly [2].
As asked by Andreas and Mathieu, the unit tests are now executed as a
part of the build.
Cheers,
Sébastien-
[1]
Dear Andreas and Mathieu,
I have just committed some modifications we have discussed yesterday.
By doing so, I have noticed that I forgot to submit a local copy of the
mongoose-3.1.tar.gz third-party dependency yesterday. This means that
the build of the package of yesterday will fail on the
Hello Mathieu,
I have uploaded another version of the package that should fix your
comments:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/orthanc/orthanc_0.2.2-6.dsc
1.
$ man -l -k docs/orthanc.1
docs/orthanc.1: nothing appropriate.
You can use help2man to quickly generate a proper man page.
Hi Andreas,
Have you thought of maintaining your package within the debian-med
umbrella org ?
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med/
Just back from vacation I read your conversation about orthanc
packaging. Besides the obvious helpful technical hints I would like to
come back to the
], presumably because of user
restrictions. Here is a tentative description for Orthanc in Debian Med
tasks:
Depends: orthanc
Homepage: https://code.google.com/p/orthanc/
WNPP: 689029
Responsible: Sebastien Jodogne s.jodo...@gmail.com
License: GPL
Pkg-Description: RESTful DICOM server for healthcare
Well, I wasn't really happy about the following (but I uploaded anyway):
$ cat d/rules
...
override_dh_auto_install:
cp $(CURDIR)/Build/Orthanc $(CURDIR)/debian/orthanc/usr/bin/orthanc
gzip -c -9 $(CURDIR)/NEWS
$(CURDIR)/debian/orthanc/usr/share/doc/orthanc/changelog.gz
What
Dear Mathieu,
Many thanks for your feedback. I have just uploaded a new version of the
Orthanc package:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/orthanc
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/orthanc/orthanc_0.2.2-1.dsc
Much better indeed ! Some comments below:
I think I have successfully
Dear Gregor,
* why libcurl4-gnutls-dev | libcurl4-nss-dev | libcurl4-openssl-dev ?
shouldn't that be something simplier like libcurl4-dev ? libcurl-dev ?
libcurl-ssl-dev ?
If I use libcurl4-dev, libcurl-dev or libcurl-ssl-dev, I
obtain the following Lintian warning:
62 matches
Mail list logo
