Re: About FASTX-Toolkit and its possible redistribution in Debian.

2009-06-28 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 04:32:58PM -0400, Assaf Gordon a écrit : > > I converted libgtextutils to shared library, and made fastx-toolkit use it. > > What's next ? > >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/ > > I've joined the list. Dear Gordon, I continue the discussion on the list since I am not t

Re: About FASTX-Toolkit and its possible redistribution in Debian.

2009-07-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, any comments on this. You did not give a contact e-mail address and Gordon might have missed your mail in case he is not subscribed to our mailing list. At least I will add the programs to our prospective package list. Kind regards Andreas. On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:25:43PM +0900,

Re: About FASTX-Toolkit and its possible redistribution in Debian.

2009-07-02 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:25:43PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > I found online a recommendation for libtool libraries to use the > > CURRENT:REVISION:AGE standard. > > > > That's fine, I used 4:0:0. > > > > But where do the header files go ? > > > > is it to /usr/include/gtextutils-4.0.0

Re: About FASTX-Toolkit and its possible redistribution in Debian.

2009-07-02 Thread Assaf Gordon
Michael Banck wrote, On 07/02/2009 03:01 PM: Is 4.0 the version of the package or really the library version? Note that both are not supposed to be connected to each other. Thanks for clarifying this. I'm new in the ways of packaging and dynamic libraries, and apparently I got it wrong. S

Re: About FASTX-Toolkit and its possible redistribution in Debian.

2009-07-03 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 07:12:22PM -0400, Assaf Gordon wrote: > The version of the library is 0.4 (MAJOR:MINOR) simply because I've > released the (static) library 3 times, each time adding minor features. > > To this latest version (0.4), I add the dynamic library build. > The library versi