Le Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:15:08PM +0100, Steffen Moeller a écrit :
> Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > I just checked the HMMER3 sources, and they do not contain (bio)squid, so
> > the
> > hmmer-squid would not have a long life.
>
> Is there an ITP for HMMER3 already?
Hmm… Since the package's name i
Charles Plessy wrote:
> I just checked the HMMER3 sources, and they do not contain (bio)squid, so the
> hmmer-squid would not have a long life.
Is there an ITP for HMMER3 already?
[...]
>
> We will face similar situations in the future. Maybe we need a dedicated page
> on our website?
Should p
Le Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 01:45:10PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
>> I just checked the HMMER3 sources, and they do not contain (bio)squid, so the
>> hmmer-squid would not have a long life.
>>
>> Squid is two different things:
>>
>> - a C library, whic
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
I just checked the HMMER3 sources, and they do not contain (bio)squid, so the
hmmer-squid would not have a long life.
Squid is two different things:
- a C library, which we do not package.
- some utilities built (statically?) with this C library, whic
Le Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 01:05:34PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Steffen Moeller wrote:
>
>> HMMer directly ships with a variant of squid itself. We noticed some
>> functions to have
>> been added. So, instead of hmmer suggesting biosquid, it could actually
>> provide it.
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Steffen Moeller wrote:
HMMer directly ships with a variant of squid itself. We noticed some functions
to have
been added. So, instead of hmmer suggesting biosquid, it could actually provide
it.
Sounds reasonable. Perhaps something like two binary packages
hmmer (De
HMMer directly ships with a variant of squid itself. We noticed some functions
to have
been added. So, instead of hmmer suggesting biosquid, it could actually provide
it.
Upstream was unsure about the degree of compatibility himselfasked about a
year ago.
I cannot recall Infernal to ship so
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 01:01:07AM +0100, Steffen Moeller a écrit :
I just learned from the upstream author of BioScuid that this is obsolete and
no longer maintained. Should it be removed from the archive? What are the
alternatives to using it?
Than
Le Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 01:01:07AM +0100, Steffen Moeller a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I just learned from the upstream author of BioScuid that this is obsolete and
> no longer maintained. Should it be removed from the archive? What are the
> alternatives to using it?
Hi Steffen,
our hmmer package rec
Hello,
I just learned from the upstream author of BioScuid that this is obsolete and
no longer
maintained. Should it be removed from the archive? What are the alternatives to
using it?
Best,
Steffen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
10 matches
Mail list logo
