Re: Bug#950311: FastQC users attention: Please comment on the remaining failures! (Was: Bug#950311: fastqc: autopkgtest regression: debhelper bump moved files to different location)

Hi Tony, On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 04:22:03PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > > This sounds all pretty convincing. Feel free to do a team upload > > implementing your suggestion. > > I went ahead and implemented this as a comparison of the summary output > with the "known good" output and pushed as a

Re: Bug#950311: FastQC users attention: Please comment on the remaining failures! (Was: Bug#950311: fastqc: autopkgtest regression: debhelper bump moved files to different location)

On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 09:46:44PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Tony, > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 12:19:17PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > > > > I spent a while looking into this bug (and thereby took a crash course > > in the Sequence Alignment Map file format) > > May be I need such a crash

Re: Bug#950311: FastQC users attention: Please comment on the remaining failures! (Was: Bug#950311: fastqc: autopkgtest regression: debhelper bump moved files to different location)

Hi Tony, On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 12:19:17PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > > I spent a while looking into this bug (and thereby took a crash course > in the Sequence Alignment Map file format) May be I need such a crash course as well. ;-) > So I think the tool is doing the right thing outputting

Re: Bug#950311: FastQC users attention: Please comment on the remaining failures! (Was: Bug#950311: fastqc: autopkgtest regression: debhelper bump moved files to different location)

On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 07:45:20AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 12:22:42 +0100 Andreas Tille wrote: > > > I'd love if some users of fastqc could comment on the outcome of these > > tests. > > Me too. Because how it looks to me (Release Team member hat on) this > test