Re: CI for mapdamage (Was: Outreachy 2017 (Round 14))

Hi Nadiya, On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 06:36:41PM -0700, Nadiya Sitdykova wrote: > I uncommented all tests in run-unit-test and now they work perfectly fine > so I closed the bug #848326 inside changelog > Also I added some info to README.test, which I think could be useful for > users Thanks for you

Re: CI for mapdamage (Was: Outreachy 2017 (Round 14))

Hello Andreas, I uncommented all tests in run-unit-test and now they work perfectly fine so I closed the bug #848326 inside changelog Also I added some info to README.test, which I think could be useful for users Regards, Nadiya On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Nadiya Sitdykova wrote: > Hello

Re: CI for mapdamage (Was: Outreachy 2017 (Round 14))

Hello Andreas, >Did you do some investigation what dependency providing liblapack.so and >libblas.so are needed (see my mail from yesterday)? Yes, I tried to run the test with different packages installed, and here are results: packages| result| u

CI for mapdamage (Was: Outreachy 2017 (Round 14))

[Changed subject to split up to topics in one thread] Hi Nadiya, On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:23:00PM -0700, Nadiya Sitdykova wrote: > 1) I read the paper about mapdamage and figured out that with given pe.sam > file the reference TGCGA wouldn't make sense as the particular type of > substituti