Re: Can somebody sponsor dialign-t

2007-11-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Charles Plessy wrote: In the end, I hardly can find a reason why somebody would want to do that. So let's Depend: dialign-t-data. Sorry for changing my mind twice :) Well, it's no shame to change your mind - at least I have no problem to learn something. ;-) Good night a

Re: Can somebody sponsor dialign-t

2007-11-14 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:56:38PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > >Downgraded dialign-t-data to recommends. > >apt-get and aptitude will install dialign-t-data together with > >dialign-t, unless the user overrides this. > > I would disagree with this if dialign-t does not work without dialign

Re: Can somebody sponsor dialign-t

2007-11-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: Downgraded dialign-t-data to recommends. apt-get and aptitude will install dialign-t-data together with dialign-t, unless the user overrides this. I would disagree with this if dialign-t does not work without dialign-t-data installed (which is

Re: Can somebody sponsor dialign-t

2007-11-14 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi again! On Nov 14, 2007 12:55 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > although I do not expect users to decide to install one without the > > other. But now I wonder if this fits the renewed interpretation of what > > Recommends: means, now

Re: Can somebody sponsor dialign-t

2007-11-14 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi! On Nov 14, 2007 12:41 PM, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > do not hesitate to send the diff uncompressed when it is so small :) Right :-) > -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends} > +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, dialign-t-data > (>=${source:Version}) > > Actu

Re: Can somebody sponsor dialign-t

2007-11-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Charles Plessy wrote: although I do not expect users to decide to install one without the other. But now I wonder if this fits the renewed interpretation of what Recommends: means, now that front-ends to dpkg install them by default. This is exactly what you want. While

Re: Can somebody sponsor dialign-t

2007-11-14 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:47:18AM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit : > > Do you agree with the attached diff? Hi Nelson do not hesitate to send the diff uncompressed when it is so small :) -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends} +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, dialign-t-

Re: Can somebody sponsor dialign-t

2007-11-14 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi! On Nov 14, 2007 9:42 AM, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:26:37AM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit : > > > > And I don't know if you already thought on this, but maybe dialign-t > > could be split into dialign-t and dialign-t-data (lintian says that >

Re: Can somebody sponsor dialign-t

2007-11-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Charles Plessy wrote: And I don't know if you already thought on this, but maybe dialign-t could be split into dialign-t and dialign-t-data (lintian says that 98% of the package are arch-independent files). It would save aproximately 10 Mo on each mirror, so why not? In th

Re: Can somebody sponsor dialign-t

2007-11-14 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:26:37AM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit : > > And I don't know if you already thought on this, but maybe dialign-t > could be split into dialign-t and dialign-t-data (lintian says that > 98% of the package are arch-independent files). It would save aproximately 10

Re: Can somebody sponsor dialign-t

2007-11-14 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi Charles! On Nov 14, 2007 2:27 AM, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Os is much better than O0, and the temporary loss of performance is in > my opinion acceptable. Very good! Do you want that I upload it? And I don't know if you already thought on this, but maybe dialign-t could be

Re: Can somebody sponsor dialign-t

2007-11-13 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 08:49:24PM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit : > Hi again! > > On Nov 13, 2007 8:34 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It builds fine if using -O0 > > Do you want to use -O0 temporarily and upload it? > > With -Os it also builds fine (-O1 fails) >

Re: Can somebody sponsor dialign-t and emboss-explorer ?

2007-11-13 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi again! On Nov 13, 2007 8:34 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It builds fine if using -O0 > Do you want to use -O0 temporarily and upload it? With -Os it also builds fine (-O1 fails) -Os is better than nothing (-O0) Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

Re: Can somebody sponsor dialign-t and emboss-explorer ?

2007-11-13 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi Charles! On Nov 12, 2007 10:54 PM, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:32:20PM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit : > > (...) > > gcc -Wall -g -O2 -c -o prob.o prob.c > > prob.c: In function 'calc_score_dist': > > prob.c:157: warning: 'sq1' is used uniniti

Re: Can somebody sponsor dialign-t and emboss-explorer ?

2007-11-12 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:32:20PM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit : > > And this one actually is failing to build :-) > See: > > (...) > gcc -Wall -g -O2 -c -o prob.o prob.c > prob.c: In function 'calc_score_dist': > prob.c:157: warning: 'sq1' is used uninitialized in this function > prob

Re: Can somebody sponsor dialign-t and emboss-explorer ?

2007-11-12 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi Charles! On Nov 12, 2007 12:07 PM, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now that ftp-master is up again, I think that emboss-explorer desserves > an update. This one I have uploaded. > I have also prepared a new package for dialign-t, a multiple alignment > software. Dialign-t does not

Can somebody sponsor dialign-t and emboss-explorer ?

2007-11-12 Thread Charles Plessy
Hi all, Now that ftp-master is up again, I think that emboss-explorer desserves an update. I have also prepared a new package for dialign-t, a multiple alignment software. Dialign-t does not build with gcc-4.2, but if I am not wrong, gcc-4.1 is still the default compiler, so we have some time to