On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 07:59:31PM +0200, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Ok, so as there are other projects that use this code have a LGPL
> license, I assume the same in this case.
IMHO this is fine, but the author(s) should be notified anyway for
clarification.
> Maybe someone else could take a
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Steffen Möller wrote:
Formally there may be a problem. But I'd say it is fair to assume the
dominating license of the package or of that folder. Is it the only
contribution from that author?
Yes, it is only one file.
Just come up with your in
Hello,
On 06/04/2011 06:48 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
thanks for all your tips.
I think I am almost finished now with the copyright file. The only open issue
is with file src/cadxcore/xmlrpc/base64.h
The author of this file is listed but there is no license mentioned. Strictly
speaking one m
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
Is there any special formatting or is it more or less "mention license(s) for
any file distributed in the package" ?
It should be in some kind of DEP-5 format. I am not sure whether this
format has to be applied yet.
Is this enough or is there
Hi everybody,
thanks for all your tips.
I think I am almost finished now with the copyright file. The only open
issue is with file src/cadxcore/xmlrpc/base64.h
The author of this file is listed but there is no license mentioned.
Strictly speaking one may not do anything with such a file. So whe
Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2011, 13:54:29 schrieb Charles Plessy:
> Le Mon, May 30, 2011 at 08:07:48PM +0200, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
> > There are about 1800 files to be checked.
> > Are there any tools to make this task a bit easier?
>
> Dear Thorsten,
>
> I routinely use grep -i -f, with a patter
Le Mon, May 30, 2011 at 08:07:48PM +0200, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
>
> There are about 1800 files to be checked.
> Are there any tools to make this task a bit easier?
Dear Thorsten,
I routinely use grep -i -f, with a pattern file containing this:
copyr
autho
licen
redis
(c)
Have a nice day,
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 07:44:27PM +0200, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Ok, it seems to be that I am back.
:-)
> As usual the problem sat in front of
> the monitor. This is so embarrassing, let us cast a veil of silence over
> it ...
Silence? Hmmm, silence - everything has its price. In this
Hi!
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Thorsten Alteholz
wrote:
> There are about 1800 files to be checked.
> Are there any tools to make this task a bit easier?
licensecheck (from the devscripts package) can help you, but it's
still highly recommended to manually review all the files (there are
c
On Mon, 30 May 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hoping for somebody who cares about the
copyright file now ...
There are about 1800 files to be checked.
Are there any tools to make this task a bit easier?
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.d
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Unfortunately I am not yet able to commit anything after the alioth
rework. There is still an error:
svn: Can't create directory
'/svn/debian-med/db/transactions/6851-1.txn':
Read-only file system
Ok, it seems to be that I am back. As usual the
Hi,
I just added the Build-Depends in SVN to make sure the build will not
fail on testing machines. Hoping for somebody who cares about the
copyright file now ...
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 08:03:52AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 06:06:04PM +0
Hi
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 08:27:26AM +0200, Carlos Barrales wrote:
> We have not a exact release date planed yet, but it could be during next
> month.
> For sure, the debian directory will be removed.
Great.
Anyway, is there any volunteer to work down the copyright issues
mentioned in the rejec
Hi Mathieu,
We have not a exact release date planed yet, but it could be during next
month.
For sure, the debian directory will be removed.
Kind Regards.
--
Carlos Barrales Ruiz.
MetaEmotion HealthCare.
carlos.barra...@metaemotion.com
http://healthcare.metaemotion.com
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 8:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 08:51:45PM +0200, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 29. Mai 2011, 05:27:08 schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
> > OK, I built and uploaded it.
> Thanks a lot.
>
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
>
> When does it usually show up ?
In this specific instance, unfortunate
Am Sonntag, 29. Mai 2011, 05:27:08 schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 05:45:26PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 05:29:35PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > > I tried building Ginkgo-CADx and it looks ok to me now. So I agree
> > > with question r6861 :)
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 10:27:08PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> OK, I built and uploaded it.
Great! Thanks
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Ar
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 06:06:04PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> I believe this is:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617240
>
> Is this happening from the chroot system ?
No - unstable chroot is fine. Just my desktop system with
$ LANG=en apt-cache policy libmysqlclient
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 05:45:26PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 05:29:35PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > I tried building Ginkgo-CADx and it looks ok to me now. So I agree
> > with question r6861 :)
>
> I can confirm that the package builds in an unstable chroot and
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> cd
> /home/tillea/debian-maintain/todo/0_debian-med_todo/ginkgo-cadx/ginkgocadx-2.4.1.1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/ginkgo
> && /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/ginkgocadx.dir/l
> ink.txt --verbose=1
> /usr/bin/c++ -g -O2 -fPI
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 05:29:35PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> I tried building Ginkgo-CADx and it looks ok to me now. So I agree
> with question r6861 :)
I can confirm that the package builds in an unstable chroot and is
lintian clean (modulo the missing manpage thingy. So if somebody migh
I tried building Ginkgo-CADx and it looks ok to me now. So I agree
with question r6861 :)
Thanks
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Thanks for the answer. Do you know when you are going to do another
> source release of Ginkgo-CADx ? It would be nice to r
Hi Carlos,
Thanks for the answer. Do you know when you are going to do another
source release of Ginkgo-CADx ? It would be nice to remove the debian
directory, this will make the packaging a little easier for us.
Thanks
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 07:54:39PM +0200, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> What exactly is the problem / error message if you try to commit?
>
> It is still something like:
> (...)
> Sendingtrunk/debian/rules
> Transmitting file data .svn: Comm
Le Fri, May 27, 2011 at 07:54:39PM +0200, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
>
> It is still something like:
> (...)
> Sendingtrunk/debian/rules
> Transmitting file data .svn: Commit failed (details follow):
> svn: Can't create directory
> '/svn/debian-med/db/transactions/6860-1.txn': Rea
On Fri, 27 May 2011, Steffen Möller wrote:
They have somehow changed to some role based stuff ... strange ... I took
the role away and added it. Give it a try, please.
*sigh* that is really strange. I still get this error.
Sounds great! I am just having some ssh key issue myself and will (if
On 05/27/2011 07:54 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
What exactly is the problem / error message if you try to commit?
It is still something like:
(...)
Sending trunk/debian/rules
Transmitting file data .svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn:
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
What exactly is the problem / error message if you try to commit?
It is still something like:
(...)
Sendingtrunk/debian/rules
Transmitting file data .svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: Can't create directory '/svn/debian-med/db/
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 08:03:49PM +0200, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Did you find anything?
What exactly is the problem / error message if you try to commit?
> As everybody else but me could commit something,
> maybe I lost the write access to the repository? So maybe it would help
> to add
Am Donnerstag, 26. Mai 2011, 09:31:19 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
response from upsteam (unquoted) see below.
start of response
Hi, all.
The openmpi dependency may be caused by ITK because a huge portion of it is
template based.
I'll review the "rpath problem explain" reference that Sebastian
Hi, all.
The openmpi dependency may be caused by ITK because a huge portion of it is
template based.
I'll review the "rpath problem explain" reference that Sebastian sent to us,
but we are too busy right now to deep in the problem.
[ For some notes about the issue, please read below the mail pa
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Steffen Möller wrote:
E: ginkgocadx: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
usr/lib/ginkgocadx/Plugins/libvisualizator.so.2.4.1.1
/usr/lib/openmpi/lib
So this is really an issue.
But I think lintian is wrong here. The error should just be
overridden.
No, the rpath is really adde
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
Unfortunately I am not yet able to commit anything after the alioth
rework. There is still an error:
svn: Can't create directory '/svn/debian-med/db/transactions/6851-1.txn':
Read-only file system
Uhmm. :-(
Any location for http download might do fo
Hello,
thank you all for your work on this.
On 05/26/2011 10:18 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> W: ginkgocadx: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig
>> W: ginkgocadx: postrm-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig
> That's a usual warning in connection with the rpath issue.
>> E: ginkgocadx: binary-or-shlib-
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> ssh svn.debian.org
thanks that works now :)
I have not touched the package since r6811, so the rpath issue is
still there. Hopefully Carlos will be able to guide us.
Thanks
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@
Hi,
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:25:18AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Here is what I have (before & after removing the $HOME/.subversion):
As I said - you need to fix .ssh/known_hosts.
> $ svn co
> svn+ssh://malat-gu...@svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/packages/dicom3tools
> svn: To bet
Charles,
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:18:35AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>> Hi Mathieu,
>>
>> at least I can confirm that svn commits work in principle if you adapt
>> your .ssh/known_hosts to the new server key. If it is no technical
>
Le Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:18:35AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> at least I can confirm that svn commits work in principle if you adapt
> your .ssh/known_hosts to the new server key. If it is no technical
> reason on your side which prevents you from commiting we might just
> w
Hi Mathieu,
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:31:19AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> i cannot update the svn today. So I'll post the output of lintian I
> got the last time I tried:
at least I can confirm that svn commits work in principle if you adapt
your .ssh/known_hosts to the new server key.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Sebastian Hilbert
wrote:
>> So in summary rpath is an Error.
>>
>
> Is this something upstream should take care of (which I have CCed) or is this
> a packaging issue ?
I asked upstream why they used rpath in the first place but never got
an answer ...
I have not d
Am Donnerstag, 26. Mai 2011, 09:31:19 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I have not built the package - but packages with lintian *warnings* can
> > be uploaded (and IMHO the rpath issue is only a warning, but I might be
> > wrong). Could anybo
Am Donnerstag, 26. Mai 2011, 09:31:19 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
See below
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I have not built the package - but packages with lintian *warnings* can
> > be uploaded (and IMHO the rpath issue is only a warning, but I might be
> > wrong).
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have not built the package - but packages with lintian *warnings* can
> be uploaded (and IMHO the rpath issue is only a warning, but I might be
> wrong). Could anybody post the output of "lintian -i" ?
i cannot update the svn today. So I
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:18:40PM +0200, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> I'd say for a first shot on this package which might go to experimental
>> this rpath issue might be ignorable.
>
> Are you sure that a package with such an error can be uploaded?
I ha
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
I'd say for a first shot on this package which might go to experimental
this rpath issue might be ignorable.
Are you sure that a package with such an error can be uploaded?
Usually it is ugly to have upstream provided debian/ dirs and I always
try to
Hi,
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 07:43:05PM +0200, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2011, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
>>> Indeed an initial package is already there. I applied some patch, but
>>> lintian still complain about a rpath for mpi. Apparently rpath is
>>> needed to go pass a lintian err
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
Indeed an initial package is already there. I applied some patch, but
lintian still complain about a rpath for mpi. Apparently rpath is
needed to go pass a lintian error already...
Could you please elaborate on what that means ? Is this something up
Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2011, 10:07:53 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >> I was under the impression that
> >> Andreas and Mathieu have prepared everything and now it takes someone to
> >> upload this. Did I miss something ?
> >
> > There is some
48 matches
Mail list logo
