Re: Imaging experts opinion wanted: Should we keep ctn?

2013-11-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, the reasons to drop ctn (besides #724935 we have #714758 blocking some transition) are bcoming stronger and stronger. Any volunteer to give it some chance and sorting out these issues or is it time for a ROM bug to ftpmaster and let it RIP. Kind regards Andreas. On Fri, Oct 11,

Imaging experts opinion wanted: Should we keep ctn?

2013-07-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I remember that I had a hard time when I updated ctn the last time which was five years ago. Upstream did not even issued a new version since ten years. So I wonder what you might think about ctn: Should I simply update the package to todays Debian standards of packaging or is this rather

Re: Imaging experts opinion wanted: Should we keep ctn?

2013-07-16 Thread Gert Wollny
Hello, On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 09:04 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: [...] we have better software to deal with the tasks that could be done with ctn? Since I never used ctn, I can not really comment about its utility. Anyway, according to this http://dicom.offis.de/history.php.en dcmtk

Re: Imaging experts opinion wanted: Should we keep ctn?

2013-07-16 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: Hi, I remember that I had a hard time when I updated ctn the last time which was five years ago. Upstream did not even issued a new version since ten years. So I wonder what you might think about ctn: Should I

Re: Imaging experts opinion wanted: Should we keep ctn?

2013-07-16 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: I remember that I had a hard time when I updated ctn the last time which was five years ago. Upstream did not even issued a new version since ten years. So I wonder what you might think about ctn: Should I simply update