Hi,
the reasons to drop ctn (besides #724935 we have #714758 blocking some
transition) are bcoming stronger and stronger. Any volunteer to give it
some chance and sorting out these issues or is it time for a ROM bug to
ftpmaster and let it RIP.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Fri, Oct 11,
Hi,
I remember that I had a hard time when I updated ctn the last time which
was five years ago. Upstream did not even issued a new version since
ten years. So I wonder what you might think about ctn: Should I simply
update the package to todays Debian standards of packaging or is this
rather
Hello,
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 09:04 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
[...] we have better software to deal with the
tasks that could be done with ctn?
Since I never used ctn, I can not really comment about its utility.
Anyway, according to this
http://dicom.offis.de/history.php.en
dcmtk
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Hi,
I remember that I had a hard time when I updated ctn the last time which
was five years ago. Upstream did not even issued a new version since
ten years. So I wonder what you might think about ctn: Should I
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
I remember that I had a hard time when I updated ctn the last time which
was five years ago. Upstream did not even issued a new version since
ten years. So I wonder what you might think about ctn: Should I simply
update
5 matches
Mail list logo