On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 10:53:12AM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > and whether you want me to sponsor the current status in Git. Please ping
> > me explicitly about
> > sponsering.
> Sponsoring would be nice, especially since the other version didn't make
> it to the archives and there are some FTB
Hello Andreas,
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 08:51 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I reverted this to 2.0.9-1 because I do not see any reason for bumping
> to 2.0.9-2 as long as there is no 2.0.9-1 inside the archive. I have no
> idea whether this answers your question
Yes, it does.
> and whether you
Hi Gert,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 05:09:54PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> I've added two patches to the upload, a regression fix and some change a
> colleague of mine needed in some experimental code.
>
> If I interpreted the messaged correctly the other version is not yet
> uploaded to ftp-master
Hello,
I've added two patches to the upload, a regression fix and some change a
colleague of mine needed in some experimental code.
If I interpreted the messaged correctly the other version is not yet
uploaded to ftp-master, but to avoid any complications if it happens
while I'm writing this I
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 04:03:14PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > > That's true. I would also prefer if you would use pristine-tar as it is
> > > described in Debian Med team policy.
>
> I guess I was a bit in a rush last Friday, now I got around to check
> everything again, and I can confirm tha
Hello Andreas,
On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 11:41 +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 22:09 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > The changes are already in git, the source package still is just
> > > uploaded to sourceforge, which means the watchfile may not yet find the
> > > version.
> >
>
Hello Andreas,
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 22:09 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > The changes are already in git, the source package still is just
> > uploaded to sourceforge, which means the watchfile may not yet find the
> > version.
>
> That's true. I would also prefer if you would use pristine-ta
Hi Gert,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 04:19:51PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> I've created a new upstream version of the package that fixes two of the
> three bugs that came up in the multi-arch compiling and works around the
> third:
>
> Bug#705383: mia: FTBFS on i386: 3 tests failed out of 228
> *
Hello Andreas,
I've created a new upstream version of the package that fixes two of the
three bugs that came up in the multi-arch compiling and works around the
third:
Bug#705383: mia: FTBFS on i386: 3 tests failed out of 228
* I commented on that before
Bug#705384: mia:FTBFS on architectures
Hi Gert,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:31:50PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> ...
> For that reason I added two more patches and uploaded all with a new
> changelog entry. I also added a tag for the debian/2.0.8-1 version you
> uploaded to ftpmaster.
Thanks for your work on this. I'd suggest I wait
Hi Andreas,
> Thanks for your work on this. Package is uploaded - hope for smooth
> passing of ftpnew queue.
It turned out that testing on powerpc and x86_64 didn't cover the bases
as I hoped, i.e. some tests failed on i386.
For that reason I added two more patches and uploaded all with a new
Hi Gert,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:36:24PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> ...
> regarding the comments from ftp-master
> - removed vistaio and boost files that had different licenses
> and are not used anyway.
> - re-licensed remaining files from LPGL 2.1+ to GPL3+
>
> As usual I tested build
Hello Andreas,
I've pushed the latest version to the server. Changes with respect to
the last version:
- upstream is now 2.0.8
- tested on powerpc (32 bit) and x86_64.
- one patch removed, three added
* one to silence a lintian manpage error warning
* one to fix a test on powerpc
* on
Hi Gert
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 05:29:02PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> now that the package has been rejected I will go for the new release
> right away. Since on PowerPC some tests fail, this will probably take
> some time.
Just take the time you need
> I would guess that this still holds, r
Hi Andreas,
now that the package has been rejected I will go for the new release
right away. Since on PowerPC some tests fail, this will probably take
some time.
I would guess that this still holds, right?
> Just create a new changelog entry pretending you would create a new
> package version
Hi Gert,
I admit that currently new processing is more or less stalled and I
guess that ftpmaster is doing this on purpose to fully concentrate on
the next release. Because it is your first package and you are lacking
some experience: This is *not* normal and usually the time for new
packages unt
Hello,
since the MIA package is still in the ftp-master pipeline and I'm
closing in for a new release that fixes a few issues, I was wondering
how I should handle the situation.
Should I prepare everything based on the already existing git tree, or
should I redo the package from scratch? In sho
Hello Andreas,
On 12/17/12 21:38, Andreas Tille wrote:
Fine. Package is uploaded. Please `git pull` for my latest change to
use xz compression - the dbg packages are quite large and using xz makes
some difference here.
Good to know how this can be done :)
Thanks, for the help.
Since the two
Hi Gert,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 04:04:29PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
>
> I renamed the according packages to mia-tools, mia-tools-dbg, and
> mia-tools-doc. The libmia-2.0-dev package descripion was also
> updated.
Fine. Package is uploaded. Please `git pull` for my latest change to
use xz com
Hello Andreas,
I pushed the changes. It took a bit more time, because I wanted to make
the build more strict to make sure that missing dependencies are not
silently dropped.
On 12/17/12 09:18, Andreas Tille wrote:
OK, this did not yet changed - so I'm waiting for your confirmation.
Besides t
Hi Gert,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 02:35:28AM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > I guess candidates would be mia2-bin for imaging and libmia-2.0-dev for
> > imaging-dev right?
> Yes.
>
> > From my personal taste I would prefer mia2-tools or
> > even mia-tools (I personally do not see a need to duplic
Hello Andreas,
> Great. As you might have noticed I did some changes - please check out
> the commit logs.
I see.
>
> > This package provides real image processing funcionality and is the
> > biggest package I'm currently preparing. i.e. this is the one that
> > should probably end up in on
Hi Gert,
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:58:09PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've uploaded the MIA package to git.debian.org/git/debian-med/mia.git
Great. As you might have noticed I did some changes - please check out
the commit logs.
> This package provides real image processing funci
Hello,
I've uploaded the MIA package to git.debian.org/git/debian-med/mia.git
This package provides real image processing funcionality and is the
biggest package I'm currently preparing. i.e. this is the one that
should probably end up in on of the tasks files.
To compile you need the latest
24 matches
Mail list logo
