Re: New version of muscle contains asm statements which prevent building on non-Intel architectures

Hi Mathieu, Am Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 05:18:01PM +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: > This assembly is for x86 based system. On arm64 you would want > something like this: > > * https://stackoverflow.com/a/67968296/136285 > > Something is definitely wrong upstream. Thanks for the hint which I forw

Re: New version of muscle contains asm statements which prevent building on non-Intel architectures

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 5:05 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi, > > I've checked the build logs of muscle version 5.1[1] and noticed that > for instance on arm64 the build fails with: > > g++ -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DNDEBUG -pthread -g -O2 > -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong

New version of muscle contains asm statements which prevent building on non-Intel architectures

Hi, I've checked the build logs of muscle version 5.1[1] and noticed that for instance on arm64 the build fails with: g++ -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DNDEBUG -pthread -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -O3 -fopenmp -ffast-math -c -o Lin