Re: should google-glog be ok with libunwind7-dev? [Was: Orthanc 0.7.2 backport of wheezy]

Hi, Thanks to Daigo's -2 of glog with suggested tune up of build-depends, I have uploaded backport build of orthanc for wheezy straight into NeuroDebian wheezy just to give it a try... Fine! Could you give the link to the repository containing your backport? Would it be possible for you to

Re: should google-glog be ok with libunwind7-dev? [Was: Orthanc 0.7.2 backport of wheezy]

On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Sebastien Jodogne wrote: Hi, Thanks to Daigo's -2 of glog with suggested tune up of build-depends, I have uploaded backport build of orthanc for wheezy straight into NeuroDebian wheezy just to give it a try... Fine! Could you give the link to the repository containing

Re: should google-glog be ok with libunwind7-dev? [Was: Orthanc 0.7.2 backport of wheezy]

Thanks to Daigo's -2 of glog with suggested tune up of build-depends, I have uploaded backport build of orthanc for wheezy straight into NeuroDebian wheezy just to give it a try... initial catch was the re-located *.dic files provided by libdcmtk2 (under /usr/share/dcmtk in wheezy and

should google-glog be ok with libunwind7-dev? [Was: Orthanc 0.7.2 backport of wheezy]

Hi Daigo, I have looked at the packporting of orthanc for Wheezy. orthanc uses google-glog and that one currently build-depends on libunwind8-dev. It seems to build (including the build-time testing -- thanks for enabling those!) fine using libunwind7-dev, so I thought to check with you - if

Re: Orthanc 0.7.2 backport of wheezy

Hi Yaroslav, On 01/13/2014 04:14 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: Thank you for packaging orthanc -- it looks very interesting! I wonder -- are there big showstoppers which would forbid its backport for wheezy? At some point (0.4.0 iirc) I have tried to build it for wheezy but then got stuck

Re: Orthanc 0.7.2 backport of wheezy

Hi, On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 01:31:29PM +0100, Sebastien Jodogne wrote: ... However, I do not know whether this is the proper way of doing things with respect to Debian policy: When doing backporting, is it OK for the build system to build third-party dependencies, without backporting the

Re: Orthanc 0.7.2 backport of wheezy

Hi Andreas and Yaroslav, I was not able either to find a complete backporting handbook for Debian Med packages: Andreas, is there such a guide available somewhere? I admit I'm quite lazy with backports and while I definitely think this is a reasonable task I somehow consider it Somebody

Re: Orthanc 0.7.2 backport of wheezy

On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Sebastien Jodogne wrote: I admit I'm quite lazy with backports and while I definitely think this is a reasonable task I somehow consider it Somebody Else's Problem. I simply need to restrict my field of work. Yes, you are perfectly right. Yaroslav, I have just

Orthanc 0.7.2 backport of wheezy

Hi Sebastien, Thank you for packaging orthanc -- it looks very interesting! I wonder -- are there big showstoppers which would forbid its backport for wheezy? At some point (0.4.0 iirc) I have tried to build it for wheezy but then got stuck while backporting also some of the dependencies...