Re: RFS: indelible 1.03-2

2016-02-14 Thread Fabian Klötzl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Afif, On 2016-02-14 06:21, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > على الجمعـة 12 شباط 2016 ‫02:40، كتب Fabian Klötzl: >> Just wondering, which timestamp is supposed to be under a >> changelog entry, the day I started a new version, or its upload >> time (or any

Re: RFS: indelible 1.03-2

2016-02-13 Thread Afif Elghraoui
Hi, Fabian, على الجمعـة 12 شباط 2016 ‫02:40، كتب Fabian Klötzl: > Just wondering, which timestamp is supposed to be under a changelog > entry, the day I started a new version, or its upload time (or anytime > in between)? I would say it's the upload time, but it doesn't seem like something people

Re: RFS: indelible 1.03-2

2016-02-12 Thread Steffen Möller
done Best, Steffen On 12/02/16 11:40, Fabian Klötzl wrote: > Hi all, > > I updated indelible to feature a brand new man page. Now the package > should be lintian-free. Would someone kindly sponsor? > > Just wondering, which timestamp is supposed to be under a changelog > entry, the day I started a

RFS: indelible 1.03-2

2016-02-12 Thread Fabian Klötzl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I updated indelible to feature a brand new man page. Now the package should be lintian-free. Would someone kindly sponsor? Just wondering, which timestamp is supposed to be under a changelog entry, the day I started a new version, or its uplo