Re: RFS: reapr

Hi Michael, > Sascha, care to share your reproducibility test setup? Sure, but it’s nothing too flashy and basically just the recommended reference setup. With cowbuilder installed and my pbuilderrc (https://github.com/satta/dotfiles/blob/master/pbuilder/.pbuilderrc) just follow the

Re: RFS: reapr

Sascha, care to share your reproducibility test setup? Joi, 25 feb. 2016, 19:51, Sascha Steinbiss a scris: > Hey, > > > [...] > >> and builds reproducibly. > > > > Actually, I just noticed it doesn't! I do get slightly different > > binaries (though no timestamps

Re: RFS: reapr

Hello, على الخميس 25 شباط 2016 ‫10:34، كتب Sascha Steinbiss: > Hey, > >> [...] >>> and builds reproducibly. >> >> Actually, I just noticed it doesn't! I do get slightly different >> binaries (though no timestamps involved) and I can't track it down >> further for now. > > OK, it was just a

Re: RFS: reapr

Hey, > [...] >> and builds reproducibly. > > Actually, I just noticed it doesn't! I do get slightly different > binaries (though no timestamps involved) and I can't track it down > further for now. OK, it was just a ccache issue in my reproducibility testing setup. The package is fine!

Re: RFS: reapr

Hi again, [...] > and builds reproducibly. Actually, I just noticed it doesn't! I do get slightly different binaries (though no timestamps involved) and I can't track it down further for now. I'll try to get in touch with the r-b team later. However, I don't consider this an upload blocker at

RFS: reapr

Hi all, with all required dependencies in place now and with a proper test case I think REAPR is ready for upload. Code is in git, could anyone take a look please? The package has no lintian errors/warnings, has build time tests as well as autopkgtests, and builds reproducibly. Many thanks,