Re: Validating debian/upstream/metadata for debian-med projects

2021-02-14 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andrius, Andrius Merkys, on 2021-02-12 18:27:52 +0200: > On 2021-02-11 20:04, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > Thanks from me as well! I landed in the industrial world before > > having a chance to start a PhD thesis; publication nomenclatures > > are kind of foreign to me. I really welcome automat

Re: Validating debian/upstream/metadata for debian-med projects

2021-02-12 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi Étienne, On 2021-02-11 20:04, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Thanks from me as well! I landed in the industrial world before > having a chance to start a PhD thesis; publication nomenclatures > are kind of foreign to me. I really welcome automated tools to > point me to my mistakes in that matter.

Re: Validating debian/upstream/metadata for debian-med projects

2021-02-11 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andrius, Nilesh Patra, on 2021-02-11 19:25:04 +0530: > +1. Thank you, Andrius! Thanks from me as well! I landed in the industrial world before having a chance to start a PhD thesis; publication nomenclatures are kind of foreign to me. I really welcome automated tools to point me to my mistak

Re: Validating debian/upstream/metadata for debian-med projects

2021-02-11 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi Andreas, Nilesh & Steffen, Thanks a lot for your feedback! I completely agree with Andreas about the assignment lintian message levels (error/warning etc) for issue categories 1-3. On 2021-02-11 15:52, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 03:16:51PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:>> 4.

Re: Validating debian/upstream/metadata for debian-med projects

2021-02-11 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 07:25:04PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Your work (including critique as far as it concerns me) is perfectly > > welcome and absolutely needed. > > +1. Thank you, Andrius! > > This looks really cool. Andreas, do you think we can integrate/use this > with routine-update? I

Re: Validating debian/upstream/metadata for debian-med projects

2021-02-11 Thread Steffen Möller
Very nice, thanks! Steffen Am 11.02.21 um 14:52 schrieb Andreas Tille: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 03:16:51PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Recent thread on debian-science@ [1] motivated me to look deeper into >> enforcing quality standards of debian/upstream/metadata files (a.k.a. >

Re: Validating debian/upstream/metadata for debian-med projects

2021-02-11 Thread Nilesh Patra
Your work (including critique as far as it concerns me) is perfectly > welcome and absolutely needed. > +1. Thank you, Andrius! This looks really cool. Andreas, do you think we can integrate/use this with routine-update? Nilesh

Re: Validating debian/upstream/metadata for debian-med projects

2021-02-11 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 03:16:51PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: > Hello, > > Recent thread on debian-science@ [1] motivated me to look deeper into > enforcing quality standards of debian/upstream/metadata files (a.k.a. > DEP 12) we ship with Debian packages. I learnt that lintian already runs > YA

Validating debian/upstream/metadata for debian-med projects

2021-02-11 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hello, Recent thread on debian-science@ [1] motivated me to look deeper into enforcing quality standards of debian/upstream/metadata files (a.k.a. DEP 12) we ship with Debian packages. I learnt that lintian already runs YAML syntax check on debian/upstream/metadata files, but further validation is