Am Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:32:08PM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier:
> Not sure why this was caught only on arm64, as amd64 turned out
> to be affected as well when I ran rebuild tests. Anyway, this
> is fixed by the newer python-bcbio-gff version 0.7.0, which has
> the good taste of being
Andreas Tille, on 2023-07-12:
> Am Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 07:56:30AM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier:
> > Pseudo-excuses for experimental only caught an arm64 issue in
> > python-bcbio-gff. Migration to biopython 1.81 should be pretty
> > painless.
>
> Cool. Thanks a lot
Not sure why this was
Am Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 07:56:30AM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier:
> Étienne Mollier, on 2023-07-10:
> > In any case, thanks for the offer, build of 1.81 for amd64 and a
> > couple of other architectures concluded[1], and experimental
> > pseudo-excuses[2] are ready to run (and they already caught
Étienne Mollier, on 2023-07-10:
> In any case, thanks for the offer, build of 1.81 for amd64 and a
> couple of other architectures concluded[1], and experimental
> pseudo-excuses[2] are ready to run (and they already caught
> #1040776[3]).
Pseudo-excuses for experimental only caught an arm64
Andreas Tille, on 2023-07-09:
> Am Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 09:30:11PM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier:
> > I pushed python-biopython 1.81 in experimental. We should be
> > able to begin investigate changes needed in reverse dependencies
> > before migrating it to unstable.
&g
Hi Étienne,
Am Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 09:30:11PM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier:
> I pushed python-biopython 1.81 in experimental. We should be
> able to begin investigate changes needed in reverse dependencies
> before migrating it to unstable.
Thanks a lot. I'm currently busy with r-c
Hi all,
I pushed python-biopython 1.81 in experimental. We should be
able to begin investigate changes needed in reverse dependencies
before migrating it to unstable.
Have a nice day, :)
--
.''`. Étienne Mollier
: :' : gpg: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
7 matches
Mail list logo
