On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 06:46:47PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> On 08/12/2009 06:34 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:33:44PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
>>> as gcc binaries are required to compile gcc from source, GT.M
>>> binaries are required to build GT.M from source.
>>
>>
Comments at [KSB3]. Thanks.
Regards
-- Bhaskar
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast.
On 08/12/2009 06:34 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:33:44PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> On 08/12/2009 02:24 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:17:53AM -0400, K.S. Bhas
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:33:44PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> On 08/12/2009 02:24 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:17:53AM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
>> > On 08/12/2009 02:21 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 06:52:24PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
>> >
Look for [KSB2] comments below. Thanks, Michael.
Regards
-- Bhaskar
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast.
On 08/12/2009 02:24 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:17:53AM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> On 08/12/2009 02:21 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 06:52:2
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:17:53AM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> On 08/12/2009 02:21 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 06:52:24PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
>
> [KSB] <...snip...>
>
>> Two questions here:
>>
>> 1. Are you sure that there is a need to install binaries for more tha
Thanks for the responses, Andreas. Please look below for [KSB] for
further questions / clarifications. Thanks again.
Regards
-- Bhaskar
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast.
On 08/12/2009 02:21 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 06:52:24PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
[KSB] <...
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 06:52:24PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> 1. Multiple releases (or versions the terms are interchangeable) can and
> usually do coexist on the same system at the same time. So, we will
> have to use the version to identify each GT.M. So, we will need
> directories with
On 08/11/2009 05:01 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 03:55:43PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
[KSB] <...snip...>
Things are well defined in Debian: Files will go to /usr (not /usr/local).
Architecture dependant files go to /usr/lib, architecture indepenant files
go to /usr/share,
Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2009, 15:55 -0400 schrieb K.S. Bhaskar:
> it appears that I should put it in subdirectories of /opt/gtm, but it
> could just as easily be argued that it belongs in /usr/local/bin/gtm.
Debian uses /usr. Packages do not put stuff under /usr/local - maybe
except empty direc
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 03:55:43PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> I manage GT.M (http://fis-gtm.com &
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/fis-gtm) and after many years of having
> GT.M on GNU/Linux available as FOSS (GPL v2 starting in 2001; AGPL v3
> since 2008), I am finally working in creating
I manage GT.M (http://fis-gtm.com &
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fis-gtm) and after many years of having
GT.M on GNU/Linux available as FOSS (GPL v2 starting in 2001; AGPL v3
since 2008), I am finally working in creating Debian packages for GT.M.
We have been assigned "gtm" as a package nam
11 matches
Mail list logo
