Le Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:24:09PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
ok. but this is getting confusing:
insighttoolkit is in debian-med
teem/kwwidgets is in debian-science
Hi all,
the use of `mr', a multiple repository management tool written by Joey Hess,
can solve this problem. With a
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Andreas Tille til...@rki.de wrote:
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
OK, you're talking about an unofficial upstream version. I have no
problem with that; indeed, I do it myself.
So it might make sense to commit Mathieu Debian stuff for VTK
into
Mathieu Malaterre writes:
However is doing it, need to update from my svn, VTK 5.2.1 was
released the other night.
Hmm. I had noticed the VTK-5-2-1-rc1 tag. Looks like the VTK-5-2-1
tag didn't get set too long ago, I see tarballs are now ready, but
the other web pages aren't yet updated, nor
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 6:25 PM, A. Maitland Bottoms bott...@debian.org wrote:
Mathieu Malaterre writes:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
Coincidentally, a couple of days ago I asked the vtk maintainer
whether he would be interested in group
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
OK, you're talking about an unofficial upstream version. I have no
problem with that; indeed, I do it myself.
So it might make sense to commit Mathieu Debian stuff for VTK
into alioth hosted repository?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
Mathieu Malaterre writes:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
Coincidentally, a couple of days ago I asked the vtk maintainer
whether he would be interested in group maintenance of VTK. However,
I suggested pkg-scicomp rather than debian-med as VTK
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
Coincidentally, a couple of days ago I asked the vtk maintainer
whether he would be interested in group maintenance of VTK. However,
I suggested pkg-scicomp rather than debian-med as VTK isn't
particularly medical.
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 07:53:19AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
I'm not sure it makes sense to have UNofficial packaging of anything
in debian-med. Is that a common practice?
It depends. I personally prefer official upstream releases. On the
Just FYI:
http://gdcm.svn.sf.net/viewvc/gdcm/Sandbox/debian-med/vtk/
Just like there is an insighttoolkit in debian-med, does it make sense
to have an unofficial vtk package in debian-med ?
Thanks merry christmas,
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 05:08:33PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Just FYI:
http://gdcm.svn.sf.net/viewvc/gdcm/Sandbox/debian-med/vtk/
Just like there is an insighttoolkit in debian-med, does it make sense
to have an unofficial vtk package in debian-med ?
Just for clarity: the
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 05:08:33PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Just FYI:
http://gdcm.svn.sf.net/viewvc/gdcm/Sandbox/debian-med/vtk/
Just like there is an insighttoolkit in debian-med, does it make sense
to have an
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
I'm not sure it makes sense to have UNofficial packaging of anything
in debian-med. Is that a common practice?
It depends. I personally prefer official upstream releases. On the
other hand sometimes upstream has unusual release habits or it
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
dcmtk is AFAIK *un*officially maintained in debian-med, right ?
What do you mean by unofficially maintained? The current maintainer
is not the Debian Med team but a single person (Jürgen Salk).
Jürgen is reading this list (but seems to be
13 matches
Mail list logo
