On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 08:50 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> >> Anyway I should probably summarize what I have been trying to do lately.
> >> Basically, I have been trying to get all the tests to pass on a sparc
> >> machine. From what I can tell, most of them have to do with gdcm, and it
> >> not
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On March 19, 2013 09:48:15 AM Paul Novotny wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 00:56 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
>> > So I turned on system tiff, added your patch, and updated the
>> > build depends. Depending on libtiff5-dev failed due
On March 19, 2013 09:48:15 AM Paul Novotny wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 00:56 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > So I turned on system tiff, added your patch, and updated the
> > build depends. Depending on libtiff5-dev failed due to conflict with
> > libvtk5- dev, so I used libtiff5-alt-dev in
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 00:56 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Just getting back to some ITK work...
>
> On February 13, 2013 08:21:52 AM Paul Novotny wrote:
>
> > So, long story short, we should use system tiff
> > (-DITK_USE_SYSTEM_TIFF:BOOL=ON) and apply the attached patch. Or, not
Hi Paul,
Just getting back to some ITK work...
On February 13, 2013 08:21:52 AM Paul Novotny wrote:
> So, long story short, we should use system tiff
> (-DITK_USE_SYSTEM_TIFF:BOOL=ON) and apply the attached patch. Or, not
> use system tiff and use the patch in [1]. I vote for using system tiff.
Ok, so itk is failing to build on big endian systems because of the TIFF
that is included with itk. I fixed this before, but it has come back. I
sent a patch upstream [1], and it has been merged and will probably be
in the next release.
However, we should probably use the system TIFF. The reason
6 matches
Mail list logo
