post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-28 Thread Steffen Moeller
Hello, in the sake of our group maintenance I want to inform you about a somewhat unusual post-inst message that I had added to the autodock package, toinform the users that upstream needs funding to maintain their software. The respective preliminary code I have just checked in. Upstream had (

Re: post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-28 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:16:46PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: > in the sake of our group maintenance I want to inform you about a somewhat > unusual > post-inst message that I had added to the autodock package, toinform the > users that > upstream needs funding to maintain their software. I h

Re: post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-28 Thread Steffen Moeller
Hello, Stefano, I got the following comments to our post-install message for the autodock package. Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:16:46PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: >> in the sake of our group maintenance I want to inform you about a somewhat >> unusual >> post-inst messa

Re: post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-28 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi! On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:16:46PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: >> in the sake of our group maintenance I want to inform you about a somewhat >> unusual >> post-inst message that I had added to the autodock package, toinform the >> use

Re: post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-29 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 02:40:24PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > We could also use README.Debian (while in practice it won't reach > every user of the package (because not everybody read this file), it's > a file that all users are supposed to read). Sure - how did it came that I forgot th

Re: post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-29 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 07:30:57PM +0200, Steffen Moeller a écrit : > Stefano, would you agree to that? We could also add a note to the startup of > the > application to show that text and optionally show this only upon the first > invocation of > autodock/autogrid. Dear all, I think that the

Re: post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-29 Thread Steffen Moeller
Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 02:40:24PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: >> We could also use README.Debian (while in practice it won't reach >> every user of the package (because not everybody read this file), it's >> a file that all users are supposed to read). > > Sure - ho

Re: post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-29 Thread Steffen Moeller
Dear Charles, thank your for your nice review of the current situation. I completely agree. To my knowledge, no Linux distribution has yet addressed this issue at all. I personally like the idea to use paypal for a transfer of funds, but even more so for the non-anonymous registration of active u

Re: post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-29 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 02:00:35PM +0200, Steffen Moeller a écrit : > > In principle, Debian-Med could have its own PayPal account to collect > donations, but this would take much of the fun away, I think. Money should > go to upstream directly and unconditionally. Hi Steffen, I think that there

Re: post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-29 Thread Michael Banck
(CCing -science because I think this applies to all fields of science and should see wider discussion) For -science, the issue is about user registration (usually before download, or on program startup) which is an important tool for scientific software authors to plead for further funding. It wa

Re: post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-29 Thread Teemu Ikonen
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Michael Banck wrote: > (CCing -science because I think this applies to all fields of science > and should see wider discussion) > > For -science, the issue is about user registration (usually before > download, or on program startup) which is an important tool for >

Re: post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-29 Thread Steffen Moeller
Michael Banck wrote: > (CCing -science because I think this applies to all fields of science > and should see wider discussion) > > For -science, the issue is about user registration (usually before > download, or on program startup) which is an important tool for > scientific software authors to

Re: post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-29 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:12:00PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > page/reminder/whatever was patched out by Debian) be changed to show a > debconf note to users upon installation instead. A debconf note might be a better alternative than the proposed postinst output and I certainly thought also abo

Re: post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-29 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 05:31:08PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:12:00PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > My proposal would be to add an inofficial control file field like > > XB-Registration: http://foo.org/register which could be exposed in the > > task pages as a "Regis

Re: post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-29 Thread Andreas Tille
[actually putting debian-blends list in CC and I would welcome to move the discussion what to store in tasks files and where to fetch data from to this list because it belongs there. I have set Reply-To] On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:41:52PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 05