On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 09:45:59AM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote:
>
> > I tried something along this path and created
> >
> > git://git.debian.org/debian-med/snappy1.0.3-java.git
> >
> > However, when doing so I noticed that all downloadable versions
> > snappy-java-1.0.3.[1-3].tar.g
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 09:48:54AM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote:
> By the way, do you plan to package it and update picard-tools or do you
> want I take this in charge.
> I can do it if you want, it is only a matter of time.
I tried to reduce your after-holiday stress by giving it a sta
Le 8/14/12 10:57 AM, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:06:46AM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote:
>> Le 8/13/12 1:35 PM, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 08:07:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
For libsnappy-java, since it still only has 10
Le 8/14/12 10:57 AM, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:06:46AM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote:
>> Le 8/13/12 1:35 PM, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 08:07:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
For libsnappy-java, since it still only has 10
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:06:46AM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote:
>
> Le 8/13/12 1:35 PM, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 08:07:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >> For libsnappy-java, since it still only has 10 Popcon users, of which I
> >> already
> >> contr
Le 8/13/12 1:35 PM, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 08:07:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> For libsnappy-java, since it still only has 10 Popcon users, of which I
>> already
>> contribute 2 or 3 points because I develop on multiple machines, we can also
>> do
>> something v
Le Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:35:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> Could you please exlpain again the advantage of having libsnappy for the
> picard-tools user?
It accelerates some operations by compressing temporary data on the fly. The
upstream website mentions a time reduction of 25 %.
ht
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 08:07:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> For libsnappy-java, since it still only has 10 Popcon users, of which I
> already
> contribute 2 or 3 points because I develop on multiple machines, we can also
> do
> something very "dark side", that is a) downgrade libsnappy-j
Le Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:30:12PM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr a écrit :
>
> Too bad
> We could indeed package a libsnappy1.0.3-java (with a conflict on
> libsnappy-java, and a recommends on picard-tools) and make picard-tools
> depend on this version.
Hi Olivier and Andreas,
first of
Le 8/13/12 11:08 AM, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:27:50AM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote:
>> I copy below the answer from upstream team.
>> They will not go to latest snappy version. Seems it was quite difficult
>> to integrate it and faced issues.
>>
>> The proble
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:27:50AM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote:
> I copy below the answer from upstream team.
> They will not go to latest snappy version. Seems it was quite difficult
> to integrate it and faced issues.
>
> The problem is snappy-java 1.0.4 breaks its API and is not com
I copy below the answer from upstream team.
They will not go to latest snappy version. Seems it was quite difficult
to integrate it and faced issues.
The problem is snappy-java 1.0.4 breaks its API and is not compatible
with version 1.0.3 used by picard-tools.
At runtime, picard-tools tries to de
12 matches
Mail list logo
