Hi.
Express should go in project/experimental, what's the way to upload there ?
Thanks.
--
Frederic Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> « Le travail a été ce que l'homme
Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.orga trouvé de mieux pour ne rien
LinuxFever: http://LinuxFever.home.ml.org faire de sa v
Hi,
I am squashing the bugs in the xisp package. Report 12773 asks to move a
conffile from /etc/options.xisp to /etc/ppp/options.xisp.
This sounds reasonable. To handle upgrading from an old version, is it enough
to move the file in preinst?
Ciao,
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, 5 Jul 1998, Florian Hinzmann wrote:
> On 03-Jul-98 Brandon Mitchell wrote:
> > The testing group is not private, the subscriptions are just done by hand.
>
> Either you or the Debian website is wrong,
> http://www.de.debian.org/MailingLists/subscribe:
>
> "debian-testing
>This
On 03-Jul-98 Brandon Mitchell wrote:
>> Can I and how can I change my subscription to the
>> non open mailing lists?
>
> The testing group is not private, the subscriptions are just done by hand.
Either you or the Debian website is wrong,
http://www.de.debian.org/MailingLists/subscribe:
"debi
On Sun, Jul 05, 1998 at 03:25:40PM +0200, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> JC> /usr/doc/debhelper/from-debstd
>
> JC> It raised another though: The result of following these instructions
> showed
> JC> me a LOT of things to add to debian/rules. Most of them aren't used
> in this
> JC> package. How
On Sun, Jul 05, 1998 at 07:25:28AM -0600, James LewisMoss wrote:
> Joseph> I could create the file in postinst if it doesn't exist, but
> Joseph> this seems like a Bad Idea for many reasons. Is there
> Joseph> really no Right Way to do this except to leave them as two
> Joseph> seperate files
> On Sun, 5 Jul 1998 07:31:30 +, Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Joseph> [1 ] What does one do in a
Joseph> situation where two packages both provide the same conffile?
Joseph> Currently they use different names for the file, but both
Joseph> packages can (and probably should)
>> "JC" == Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JC> /usr/doc/debhelper/from-debstd
JC> It raised another though: The result of following these instructions
showed
JC> me a LOT of things to add to debian/rules. Most of them aren't used
in this
JC> package. How do I know which are and whi
On Sun, Jul 05, 1998 at 03:43:17AM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I could create the file in postinst if it doesn't exist, but this seems like
> > a Bad Idea for many reasons. Is there really no Right Way to do this
> > except to leave them as two seperate files and have the user deal with it
> > how
Joseph Carter wrote:
> What does one do in a situation where two packages both provide the same
> conffile? Currently they use different names for the file, but both
> packages can (and probably should) use the same file. How should this be
> handled, both from a policy and from an implementation
On Sun, Jul 05, 1998 at 07:21:43AM +, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 04, 1998 at 11:40:11PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > debstd is depricated, use the debhelper instead.
>
> I've seen several messages on this line, but I have to say it's not entirely
> helpful. I've discovered debstd
What does one do in a situation where two packages both provide the same
conffile? Currently they use different names for the file, but both
packages can (and probably should) use the same file. How should this be
handled, both from a policy and from an implementation standpoint?
I could create
On Sat, Jul 04, 1998 at 11:40:11PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> debstd is depricated, use the debhelper instead.
I've seen several messages on this line, but I have to say it's not entirely
helpful. I've discovered debstd does a LOT today. The package I'm looking
at which uses it I'd like to c
13 matches
Mail list logo
