Re: debmake + devscripts vs. debhelper

1998-10-07 Thread Martin Schulze
Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote: > I have been using debmake+devscripts to build my debian packages till > now. How does this compare to debhelper? Also, I remember seeing some > post in debian-devel which said that one of these (debmake or debhelper) > is being orphaned or is no longer in active

RE: debmake + devscripts vs. debhelper

1998-10-07 Thread Shaleh
debhelper is the one under active development. It makes the build process rather nice. Hand rolling is not needed. No sense making it complicated.

debmake + devscripts vs. debhelper

1998-10-07 Thread Sudhakar Chandrasekharan
I have been using debmake+devscripts to build my debian packages till now. How does this compare to debhelper? Also, I remember seeing some post in debian-devel which said that one of these (debmake or debhelper) is being orphaned or is no longer in active development. Should I move to debhelper

Re: Incorrect section

1998-10-07 Thread Paul Slootman
On Tue 06 Oct 1998, Brian Almeida wrote: > I have a package that is all stuffed into one section (and an incorrect one, > at > that). Can I just modify the Section: fields in debian/control, reupload, and > have things sort themselves out? Is there anything special I need to do? You can upload