On Thu, 22 Oct 1998, Stephen J. Carpenter wrote:
sjc>without looking atthe display of my pager) but... I was sure it had been
sjc>frozen.
Me too. It was easy to miss. There was hoopla about a date, and
then I missed an announcement to the contrary. A bit confusing.
John Lapeyre <[EMAIL
Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> Just my 2 pennies,
I would have expected yen. :-)
scnr,
Joey
--
Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.
Hi,
I just want to know what happen between Debian-JP
(http://www.debian.or.jp) and Debian. I just discover their distribution
a week ago because I'm maintaining a new package for learning kanji
(the japanese characters) and, asking the upstream maintainer of one
of the dictionnary, he just poin
Stephen J. Carpenter wrote:
> I know that my concept of time is flawed at best (I often have no idea what
> day of the week it is, much less the real date, or even month
> without looking atthe display of my pager) but... I was sure it had been
> frozen.
Well, you're somewhat right, slink was ann
On Thu, Oct 22, 1998 at 05:34:29PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Hi.
>
> No, slink has not been frozen yet.
>
> Better that way, because it is greatly broken.
>
> Brian, what are your plans with respect to slink?
>
> I'm glad that it has not been frozen yet. Could we please continue in the
> un
Hi.
No, slink has not been frozen yet.
Better that way, because it is greatly broken.
Brian, what are your plans with respect to slink?
I'm glad that it has not been frozen yet. Could we please continue in the
unstable stage until some of the more broken packages are properly fixed?
--
"f634
On Thu, Oct 22, 1998 at 09:24:42AM -0400, Dale E. Martin wrote:
>
> There is a new upstream version of the package that I maintain. I'd like
> to package it and upload it ASAP, but I don't want to "violate" the code
> freeze somehow. Is it up to the developers to enforce the freeze by not
> uplo
There is a new upstream version of the package that I maintain. I'd like
to package it and upload it ASAP, but I don't want to "violate" the code
freeze somehow. Is it up to the developers to enforce the freeze by not
uploading new packages, or is it handled at the other end by not merging
new p
On Tue, Oct 20, 1998 at 05:14:30PM -0700, Jeremiah Cornelius wrote:
> You had announced on the E-dev list that you were no longer interested
> in being the .deb maintainer for Enlightenment, and had found two new
> parties for this.
> Could you announce this again? You also mentioned the packaging
9 matches
Mail list logo
