>> "PSG" == Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PSG> Thanks. `admin' would be my first guess as to where to look for
PSG> such a package, but I didn't see any other monitoring tools
PSG> there,
The xlogmaster package is in admin.
Ciao,
Martin
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You will then need to update your pgp key by sending it to the pgp
> maintainer email (i forget what it is).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
James
Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it possible to use dupload from a non-debian box?
Probably, it's just perl, but you don't have to use dupload, you can
always do it by hand; I did this for years on a Solaris box (and
continue to do it on a Linux box).
--
James
> "Jason" == Jason Henry Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jason> I checked on master and va, they only have GTK1.0
Jason> installed, not GTK1.1, which mozilla needs to build. Are
Jason> there any hosts offered by debian that have libs from
Jason> unstable to help out in this
> So I would recomend asking Ben Gertzfield about gtk and gtk1.1
> there could very well be a reason it isn't packaged yet (could be anything
> from lack of time on hsi part to technical problems with it or packaging
> it or whatever)
>
> Will it really NOT work with 1.0? have you tried it?
>
it
On Mon, 14 Dec 1998, Kristoffer Rose wrote:
> This is a good idea but you should of course contact the maintainer of the
> existing OCAML package, version 1.05-2, before going further! It is
> Christophe Le Bars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Allow some weeks for the reply.
I've already contacted him and
On Tue, Dec 15, 1998 at 04:29:31AM +1000, Jason Henry Parker wrote:
> I'm a recently accepted maintainer; a few days ago, while I searched for
> something to package, a friend suggested that I have a look at mozilla
> (since I'd managed to get it compiled on my own system from CVS).
> The more I th
On Tue, Dec 15, 1998 at 04:29:31AM +1000, Jason Henry Parker wrote:
> I'm a recently accepted maintainer; a few days ago, while I searched for
> something to package, a friend suggested that I have a look at mozilla
> (since I'd managed to get it compiled on my own system from CVS).
> The more I th
Dear Sven and Fernando,
You have both expressed an interest in packaging a more recent version of
OCAML than the one that is presently in Debian.
This is a good idea but you should of course contact the maintainer of the
existing OCAML package, version 1.05-2, before going further! It is
Christo
I'm a recently accepted maintainer; a few days ago, while I searched for
something to package, a friend suggested that I have a look at mozilla
(since I'd managed to get it compiled on my own system from CVS).
The more I think of taking it on, the better it sounds, but there's
one snag[1].
When I
On Mon, 14 Dec 1998, Fernando Sanchez wrote:
> First, to compile ocaml I need to call "make install" (in 'rules' file) in
> the following way for it to install binaries where it has to:
>
> $(MAKE) install BINDIR=`pwd`/debian/tmp/usr/bin \
> LIBDIR=`pwd`/debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml MANDIR=`pwd`/debi
On 14-Dec-98 Fernando Sanchez wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm packaging ocaml, a ml-type language interpreter and compiler,
> and everything works ok but I have two questions, I hope quite easy to
> answer:
>
> First, to compile ocaml I need to call "make install" (in 'rules' file) in
> the following
Hello,
I'm packaging ocaml, a ml-type language interpreter and compiler,
and everything works ok but I have two questions, I hope quite easy to
answer:
First, to compile ocaml I need to call "make install" (in 'rules' file) in
the following way for it to install binaries where it has to:
On Mon, Dec 14, 1998 at 12:56:10PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> * is there a dpkg-buildpackage option to give the pgp id to use ?
You can change the maintainer but that defeats the purpose.
> * is it possible to change the pgp id in the keyring ?
You can add this new ID to your existing key with
On 14-Dec-98 Sven LUTHER wrote:
> Hello, ...
>
> i am currently packaging mlgtk, the Ocaml bindings for Gtk+.
>
> the mlgtk sources are under the LGPL, so they should go into main, same as
> all
> the gtk stuff.
>
sounds like contrib if ocaml remains non-free. Is there not another ml
interpre
Richard Braakman wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > In this case, they changed it to contrib/x11, because it's an X program.
>
> In this case, it was probably a mistake. I don't consciously remember
> changing it. utils fits as well as anything, though perhaps admin
> would be better. I chang
Hello, ...
i am currently packaging mlgtk, the Ocaml bindings for Gtk+.
the mlgtk sources are under the LGPL, so they should go into main, same as all
the gtk stuff.
but ocaml is in non-free (well actually it is just on my harddrive, because i
am still asking autorisation from the autors to make
Hello, ...
i became debian developper recently, and am using a pgp id in the form of my
name, followed by my private email address.
now i actually began to build packages, and i figured it would be best to put
my debian email address in the maintainer field instead of my private one.
so i did
Ben Bucksch wrote:
> the following msg was ignored in the discussion. Have I done something
> wrong?
Speaking for myself, I reply to less than 1% of the mail I get.
And it is the nature of email discussions that you are likely to only
get replies if people disagree, or if you present something wo
I'm consider to becomming a debian maintainer and I have a few
packages I want to packages. My problem is that my debianbox (or linux
for that sake) isn't on the net.
At work we're using HPUXes and I would like to upload from there. dupload
depends on dpkg but I don't see why.
Is it possible to u
Julian Gilbey wrote:
> [...]
> Erm, yes, forgot that bit!!
>
> You must check that you can do the following successfully, and that
> the package works after you have done each one:
>
> (a) Upgrade from the previous version and from the version in hamm.
> (b) Downgrade back again.
> (c) Install th
21 matches
Mail list logo
