Re: Upload failure

1999-05-17 Thread Matt Kern
On 17 May 1999, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Matt Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The other day I uploaded OPIE to master, but somehow fscked up and > > uploaded > > opie_2.32-1.tar.gz > > instead of > > opie_2.32.orig.tar.gz and > > opie_2.32-1.diff.gz > > > > How can I correct my

Re: Menu-entry and Variable holding X-clipboard

1999-05-17 Thread Gus
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 10:04:34AM +0100, Matthias Kabel wrote: > Is there a way for all windowmanager to get the content of > the X-clipboard? you'll probably have to write a wrapper program that grabs the clipboard and passes it as an argument this shouldn't be too hard - i'll leave it up to

Re: the place for file

1999-05-17 Thread Michael Sobolev
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 11:19:58AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > The package consists of a script that processes an SGML-file and produces a > > HTML file. The resulting file makes use of an external stylesheet I want to > > put into the package as well. Where should I put this stylesheet? > >

Re: SSL & Non-SSL package from one source package

1999-05-17 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 16-May-99 Leon Breedt wrote: > > Is it possible to do this? > > > > I.e. have one source package build for both us & non-us? > > > > As long as I can tell it before package build to NOT build the non-us, yes. > Otherwise it could be illegal, immoral or

Re: Upload failure

1999-05-17 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Matt Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The other day I uploaded OPIE to master, but somehow fscked up and > uploaded > opie_2.32-1.tar.gz > instead of > opie_2.32.orig.tar.gz and > opie_2.32-1.diff.gz > > How can I correct my earlier blunder? Remove the files from Incoming or

Re: the place for file

1999-05-17 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Michael Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm trying to create a small package for myself (for `local' > part of the archive :) > > The package consists of a script that processes an SGML-file and produces a > HTML file. The resulting file makes use of an external stylesheet I want to > put

bin86

1999-05-17 Thread Aldenor Falcao
I wonder what is the reason that bin86 is not listed as a dependency for kernel-source, and just as a suggested package? I know it is only for x86* architectures, but we could change the script to verify the port and request the bin86 in such case. What do you think? Thanks,

Re: version numbers

1999-05-17 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 08:19:18AM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > Mitch writes: > > Digit placement, (such as that used in 1.02) should not be used in a > > versioning scheme, because it places predetermined limits on the number > > of revisions that can happen within a given level. > > Not if a deci

Menu-entry and Variable holding X-clipboard

1999-05-17 Thread Matthias Kabel
Hello, I'm packaging a dictionary with a little shellscript to lookup the words. It is possible to invoke this script with the X-clipboard as an argument. It will spawn an xmessages window with all translations in the dictionary. So I have to use a variable with the content of the X-clipboard. I

RE: SSL & Non-SSL package from one source package

1999-05-17 Thread Shaleh
On 16-May-99 Leon Breedt wrote: > Is it possible to do this? > > I.e. have one source package build for both us & non-us? > As long as I can tell it before package build to NOT build the non-us, yes. Otherwise it could be illegal, immoral or whatever (-:

Re: non-free file in free sources

1999-05-17 Thread James LewisMoss
> On Wed, 12 May 1999 13:16:11 +0200, Roland Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: Roland> I had a look into the xfig documentation and found out, that Roland> xfig has some code for writing GIF files in it, which is only Roland> used for capturing and can be replaced by PCX without an

Re: SSL & Non-SSL package from one source package

1999-05-17 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 09:16:29PM +0200, Leon Breedt wrote: > Is it possible to do this? > > I.e. have one source package build for both us & non-us? Yes, but the how kinda varies from package to package. No promises dinstall will like this at all, but it would be possible from the standpoint