Re: whom should I file a bug report against?

1999-08-10 Thread Gopal Narayanan
On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 07:27:01PM +0200, KELEMEN Peter wrote: > Apart from this, someone please shed some light on where can I find a > development machine for unstable that has *all* the latest Debian > development stuffs installed? Meaning dpkg-dev, dh-make, debhelper, > cvs, cvs-buildpackage,

Re: whom should I file a bug report against?

1999-08-10 Thread KELEMEN Peter
On Tue, 1999-08-10 13:03:09 -0400, Mark Buda wrote: > > No packages found matching dephelper. > ^^*^^ > Your spelling teacher? :-) Got it. Too many hours uptime is not a Good Thing(tm). *sigh* Apart from this, my question still holds regarding an unstable devel

Re: whom should I file a bug report against?

1999-08-10 Thread KELEMEN Peter
> > No packages found matching dephelper. > > master:~/debian$ > > > > The subject says it all. > Hehehe...thanks for some comic relief :) > /me wonders how many of the 1000s of bugs are of this calibre... :) OK. Take it as you wish, but *I* would like to know what version of packages I work w

Re: whom should I file a bug report against?

1999-08-10 Thread Leon Breedt
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, KELEMEN Peter wrote: > No packages found matching dephelper. > master:~/debian$ > > The subject says it all. Hehehe...thanks for some comic relief :) /me wonders how many of the 1000s of bugs are of this calibre... :) -- Leon J. Breedt| leon @ obsidian.co.za Linux

Re: whom should I file a bug report against?

1999-08-10 Thread Mark Buda
KELEMEN Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No packages found matching dephelper. ^^*^^ Your spelling teacher? :-) -- I get my monkeys for nothing and my chimps for free. http://www.clark.net/pub/hermit/

whom should I file a bug report against?

1999-08-10 Thread KELEMEN Peter
master:~/debian$ dpkg -S dh_installmanpages debhelper: /usr/man/man1/dh_installmanpages.1.gz debhelper: /usr/bin/dh_installmanpages master:~/debian$ dpkg -l dephelper No packages found matching dephelper. master:~/debian$ The subject says it all. Fuji^ -- .+'''+. .+'''+.

Re: multiple binary package - please help

1999-08-10 Thread Martin Bialasinski
* "Jozef" == Jozef Hitzinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jozef> I've managed to do simple package, but now I need more .. what Jozef> should I do, apart from adding package section to control and Jozef> creating package.init etc for each bin package? Should I change Jozef> something in rules or el

Re: multiple binary package - please help

1999-08-10 Thread Leon Breedt
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Jozef Hitzinger wrote: > I've got them printed out. AFAIK, maint-guide doesn't cover multi-bin > packages ("as a new maintainer, you're discouraged to do multiple packs or > libs"), while packaging-manual talks of dpkg stuff and doesn't cover > the process at debhelper level.

Re: multiple binary package - please help

1999-08-10 Thread Jozef Hitzinger
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Leon Breedt wrote: > see the packaging-manual, maint-guide packages I've got them printed out. AFAIK, maint-guide doesn't cover multi-bin packages ("as a new maintainer, you're discouraged to do multiple packs or libs"), while packaging-manual talks of dpkg stuff and doesn't

Re: multiple binary package - please help

1999-08-10 Thread Leon Breedt
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Jozef Hitzinger wrote: > I've managed to do simple package, but now I need more .. what should > I do, apart from adding package section to control and creating > package.init etc for each bin package? Should I change something in > rules or elsewhere? I'm using debhelper. >

multiple binary package - please help

1999-08-10 Thread Jozef Hitzinger
I've managed to do simple package, but now I need more .. what should I do, apart from adding package section to control and creating package.init etc for each bin package? Should I change something in rules or elsewhere? I'm using debhelper. Pointer to appropriate doc will be enough. Thanx! --

Re: Depenency Bugs in Debian Packages (long)

1999-08-10 Thread David Coe
Richard Braakman wrote: > "Any", not "all". > > Please re-read section 4.2.3 of the Packaging Manual. Thanks; that's exactly what I needed to do.

Re: Depenency Bugs in Debian Packages (long)

1999-08-10 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 11:06:26PM +, David Coe wrote: > > [ispell dependency problems] > The problem here is that ispell, and most (all > but the above four) of the ispell dictionaries, > have "Architecture: i386". > > I suspect that the ispell dictionaries are not > (should not be) architec