At work I was asked to set up a chrooted bind and as our name servers run
Debian, I decided to make a package out of it. This is a statically
compiled bind from the latest official Debian bind package created
following the instructions at www.psionic.com.
I have way too much on my plate right now
Hi!
Is there somebody who is willing to sponsor
metamail? It's my first package and I am
currently in the nm queue (initial contact
with AM has been established).
I thought that it would be wise to first go
and have a try at the unstable package and
fix the bugs mentioned at bugs.debian.org.
At work I was asked to set up a chrooted bind and as our name servers run
Debian, I decided to make a package out of it. This is a statically
compiled bind from the latest official Debian bind package created
following the instructions at www.psionic.com.
I have way too much on my plate right no
On 11-Nov-2000 Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 10:58:49PM +0100, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote:
>> Is anybody know what's wrong if lintian sings:
>>
>> defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/share/lintian/checks/perl line 154
>> (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?)
>> defined(%
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > > Which of Debian's architectures are big-endian, and are there any
> > > machines online that I, as a Debian developer, can log in and test the
> > > software I maintain to see if it works properly on big-endian?
>
> > The
On 11-Nov-2000 Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 10:58:49PM +0100, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote:
>> Is anybody know what's wrong if lintian sings:
>>
>> defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/share/lintian/checks/perl line 154
>> (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?)
>> defined(
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > > Which of Debian's architectures are big-endian, and are there any
> > > machines online that I, as a Debian developer, can log in and test the
> > > software I maintain to see if it works properly on big-endian?
>
> > Th
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 12:41:24PM -0500, stramiello wrote:
> What do I need to do to packaged a new program (VirtualFTPD) and become a
> maintainer?
[snip]
Take a look at:
http://www.debian.org/devel/join/newmaint
T
--
The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably th
What do I need to do to packaged a new program (VirtualFTPD) and become a
maintainer?
~Warren
Warren Stramiello |
325909 GT Station | A good USENET Motto would be:
Atlanta, GA 30332 | a) "Together, a strong community"
(404) 206-4208
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 12:41:24PM -0500, stramiello wrote:
> What do I need to do to packaged a new program (VirtualFTPD) and become a
> maintainer?
[snip]
Take a look at:
http://www.debian.org/devel/join/newmaint
T
--
The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably t
What do I need to do to packaged a new program (VirtualFTPD) and become a
maintainer?
~Warren
Warren Stramiello |
325909 GT Station | A good USENET Motto would be:
Atlanta, GA 30332 | a) "Together, a strong community"
(404) 206-4208
On Sun, 2000-Nov-12, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It's my understanding that whether 'char' maps to an unsigned or a signed char
> is a function of the compiler, not of the architecture. Does gcc really use
> different default values on arm and PPC than on other architectures? If so,
> why?
I wouldn't
On Sun, 2000-Nov-12, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It's my understanding that whether 'char' maps to an unsigned or a signed char
> is a function of the compiler, not of the architecture. Does gcc really use
> different default values on arm and PPC than on other architectures? If so,
> why?
I wouldn't
Michael Meding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I tried a apt-get source xfree --compile on a potato where the xfree
> 4.01 was taken from woody (or dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc for that matter
> in the xfree-4.01 directory). So far it went well, it showed "full build
> of XFree86 complete"
14 matches
Mail list logo
