Hi,
I've a bug report #79224 against memprof who doesn't work anymore with
optimized libc6 libraries.
A LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libc-2.2.so doesn't work.
I've a solution :-)
Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
Any other idea ?
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:20:33PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
Hi,
I've a bug report #79224 against memprof who doesn't work anymore with
optimized libc6 libraries.
A LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libc-2.2.so doesn't work.
I've a solution :-)
Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
How about
"BC" == Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I've a solution :-)
Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
BC How about allowing me to conflict with you package, as I have done with
BC libsafe (which also doesn't work with these libraries).
Which is the difference ?
Christian
--
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:36:08PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
"BC" == Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I've a solution :-)
Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
BC How about allowing me to conflict with you package, as I have done with
BC libsafe (which also
"BC" == Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Which is the difference ?
BC The difference is that you have one package that conflicts with any of the
BC optimized library packages I have. There going to be more, so it is easier
BC for me to add your one package, than for your to
In Thu, 14 Dec 2000 16:11:32 -0500 Chris Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate
scripsit :
Actually, it doesn't have to be this complicated. I had just made my
debian/shlibs.local file with the wrong soname. After looking at
atlas2.shlibs, I was able to correct it. Just for future reference,
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:20:02PM +0800, Zhao Wei [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake forth:
As read from packaging-manual, there're two ways to handle
system specific config files, one to list them in debian/conffiles,
the other is (optionally write a /usr/bin/pkgxxxconfig to aid) to
write/modify the
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 11:44:03AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been reading archives of debian-new-maintainer and debian-mentor, and
I'm somewhat confused about which older GPG keys have problems. If I have
a key
~/Program_Source $ gpg --list-keys David Starner
pub
Hi,
I've a bug report #79224 against memprof who doesn't work anymore with
optimized libc6 libraries.
A LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libc-2.2.so doesn't work.
I've a solution :-)
Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
Any other idea ?
Christian
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:20:33PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
Hi,
I've a bug report #79224 against memprof who doesn't work anymore with
optimized libc6 libraries.
A LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libc-2.2.so doesn't work.
I've a solution :-)
Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
How about
BC == Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I've a solution :-)
Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
BC How about allowing me to conflict with you package, as I have done with
BC libsafe (which also doesn't work with these libraries).
Which is the difference ?
Christian
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:36:08PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
BC == Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I've a solution :-)
Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
BC How about allowing me to conflict with you package, as I have done with
BC libsafe (which also
BC == Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Which is the difference ?
BC The difference is that you have one package that conflicts with any of the
BC optimized library packages I have. There going to be more, so it is easier
BC for me to add your one package, than for your to maintain
Hi, Mentor-helpers ;-)
As read from packaging-manual, there're two ways to handle
system specific config files, one to list them in debian/conffiles,
the other is (optionally write a /usr/bin/pkgxxxconfig to aid) to
write/modify the config file in debian/postinst, and don't list them
in
Hi,
Sometime a ``dpkg -S /usr/bin/f'' fails to print out the package
which owns it. Could you please tell me why this may happen? i.e. what
is the possible reason(s) for it? Thanks!
Another question is, ``dpkg -S /usr/bin/f'' is notably slower than
``grep /usr/bin/f
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:45:25PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
It's still writing drew into the Followup-To header. I'll try unsetting
the mutt variable this time.
Try:
set nofollowup_to
I think this might be buggy, in that it's prolly never correct to send a
'MFT: UserWithNoMailDomain' .
No, not the adult diapers.
What I would like to do is control the behaviour of dpkg-shlibdeps
wrt one library. In particular, I would like it to use lapack instead
of atlas2 because there is about a 5 Mb difference between the two
packages and I only need liblapack.
Unfortunately, the man
In Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:06:23 -0500 Chris Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate
scripsit :
What I would like to do is control the behaviour of dpkg-shlibdeps
wrt one library. In particular, I would like it to use lapack instead
of atlas2 because there is about a 5 Mb difference between the two
Junichi Uekawa writes:
ju In Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:06:23 -0500 Chris Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum
veritate scripsit :
What I would like to do is control the behaviour of
dpkg-shlibdeps wrt one library. In particular, I would like
it to use lapack instead of atlas2 because there
Hi!
I am currently waiting for DAM approval in NM queue.
The program I packaged is named 'potool'. It is a program and a
few scripts that greatly ease editing editing of po files,
using your favourite editor.
The package (lintian clean) is waiting for you at
In Thu, 14 Dec 2000 16:11:32 -0500 Chris Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate
scripsit :
Actually, it doesn't have to be this complicated. I had just made my
debian/shlibs.local file with the wrong soname. After looking at
atlas2.shlibs, I was able to correct it. Just for future reference,
21 matches
Mail list logo
