Re: seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-05 Thread Goswin Brederlow
> " " == Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a > different dependecy for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc > does not require isapnp, which isn't even available for > sparc). Is this possible? I haven't be

Re: seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-05 Thread Goswin Brederlow
> " " == Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a > different dependecy for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc > does not require isapnp, which isn't even available for > sparc). Is this possible? I haven't b

Re: seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-05 Thread Jérôme Marant
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! > > For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a different dependecy > for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc does not require isapnp, > which isn't even available for sparc). Is this possible? I haven't been > able to find anything abou

seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-05 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi! For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a different dependecy for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc does not require isapnp, which isn't even available for sparc). Is this possible? I haven't been able to find anything about this in the packaging manual. -- Kind regards, +---

Re: How popular is the sponsor page?

2001-01-05 Thread Peter Palfrader
Hi Bastian! On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: > How popular is this web page? It is linked from > http://www.debian.de/devel/join/ > but I think that very few potential sponsors are reading this. I think that is the case, not many developers read it.

Re: How popular is the sponsor page?

2001-01-05 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Thursday 4 January 2001, at 19 h 31, the keyboard of Bastian Kleineidam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How popular is this web page? It is mostly a reminder, and a way to spam^H^H^H^Hmail all candidates and it can be used as a reference: mail from time to time on debian-devel (or relevant ma

Re: seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-05 Thread Jérôme Marant
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! > > For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a different dependecy > for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc does not require isapnp, > which isn't even available for sparc). Is this possible? I haven't been > able to find anything abo

seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-05 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi! For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a different dependecy for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc does not require isapnp, which isn't even available for sparc). Is this possible? I haven't been able to find anything about this in the packaging manual. -- Kind regards, +--

Re: How popular is the sponsor page?

2001-01-05 Thread Peter Palfrader
Hi Bastian! On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: > How popular is this web page? It is linked from > http://www.debian.de/devel/join/ > but I think that very few potential sponsors are reading this. I think that is the case, not many developers read it.

Re: How popular is the sponsor page?

2001-01-05 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Thursday 4 January 2001, at 19 h 31, the keyboard of Bastian Kleineidam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How popular is this web page? It is mostly a reminder, and a way to spam^H^H^H^Hmail all candidates and it can be used as a reference: mail from time to time on debian-devel (or relevant ma