Hi fokes.
I know that /. has got a big thing about setting up a linux based set
top box... but I'm just wondering, has anyone worked on the emdebian
project here?? hows it going?? would it be easy to port that to higher
speced hardware, and set it up for set top use (i.e play
Hi,
I was hoping to find a maintainer in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, who
wouldn't mind meeting me and signing my GPG key. It's nearly the last
step for me in the NM process, and I'm hoping someone will be able to
help me out.
Regards,
Aubin
--
"PUNK IS: a belief that this world is what we make
Hello!
I'm looking for info/doc/scripts/hints on proper / practical ways to
submit patches.
Of interest to me is also the proper way to generate a patch to a
single file - what is the best point in the dir structure to start?
Toplevel, ../Toplevel, ... ?
But currently i do have fixes for
* Patrick Barr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010201 07:54]:
I know that /. has got a big thing about setting up a linux based set
top box... but I'm just wondering, has anyone worked on the emdebian
project here?? hows it going?? would it be easy to port that to higher
I would say it is dead. I
I want to read up on debian-bsd. I would like to do that in a
convenient and well supported manner.
Can I get the whole mbox (from where?) and read it at home?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 31-Jan-2001 Martin Albert wrote:
Hello!
I'm looking for info/doc/scripts/hints on proper / practical ways to
submit patches.
Of interest to me is also the proper way to generate a patch to a
single file - what is the best point in the dir structure to start?
Toplevel, ../Toplevel,
Hi,
I've this error (with sid) :
I don't know wath's wrong.
Christian
$ debuild -rfakeroot
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is gtktalog
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1:0.11.1-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dpkg-buildpackage: build
I'm currently packaging the DECnet progs and they are dependant on a 2.4 kernel,
is there any recommended way to enforce this or should I just put a check in the
startup script and a note in the description?
Another thing it does is to change the MAC address of any/all ethernet cards in
the
Another thing it does is to change the MAC address of any/all ethernet cards
in the system (requiring a reboot).
Why do you need to reboot just to change the MAC?
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 08:25:31AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 12:02:16PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
dpkg-statoverride is only for the sysadmin to change things *from*
their normal settings.
But that doesn't explain why it says the directory doesn't exist..
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Description:
Z81/Z81txt/xz81 are ZX81 (TS1000) and ZX80 emulators
for (respectively) svgalib, text mode, and X. They
load/save Xtender-format .P files, and support the
ZX81's pseudo-hi-res mode. A few ZX81-related utils,
GIFs of the keyboard
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 08:13:57AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
You should always be able to backport a patch. If not, I'm sorry, but that
this should be one quality of a Debian maintainer, you lack something...
You must be kidding. We can't expect from any maintainer the ability
to be able
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 02:54:34PM +, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
I'm currently packaging the DECnet progs and they are dependant on a 2.4 kernel,
is there any recommended way to enforce this or should I just put a check in the
startup script and a note in the description?
Another thing it
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:08:22PM -0600, Gordon Sadler wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 02:54:34PM +, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
I'm currently packaging the DECnet progs and they are dependant on a 2.4 kernel,
is there any recommended way to enforce this or should I just put a check in the
* "Martin" == Martin Albert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
So recipient has to use patch -p1 (or rename his archive) right?
Do you tell them or just let'em figure it out?
You can expect that every developer knows how to use patch and that he
will first inspect the file you sent him before
"Torsten" == Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Torsten On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 08:13:57AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
You should always be able to backport a patch. If not, I'm sorry, but that
this should be one quality of a Debian maintainer, you lack something...
Torsten
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 03:35:53PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Have we accepted that mediocrity is really our lot? What
happened to the quest for excellence? I joined an effort to create
the *BEST* distribution of linux, not merely a feel good, prolific
one.
How about
"Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marcus On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 03:35:53PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Have we accepted that mediocrity is really our lot? What
happened to the quest for excellence? I joined an effort to create
the *BEST* distribution of linux,
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:46:01PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I'm in Toronto, and I can probably sign your key (depends on the
schedule). Dirk Eddelbuettel is another Debian developer in Toronto who
can do that (in fact, he was the one who signed my key). I'm not sure if
Dirk is subscribed to
* Patrick Barr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010201 07:54]:
I know that /. has got a big thing about setting up a linux based set
top box... but I'm just wondering, has anyone worked on the emdebian
project here?? hows it going?? would it be easy to port that to higher
I would say it is dead. I Used
I want to read up on debian-bsd. I would like to do that in a
convenient and well supported manner.
Can I get the whole mbox (from where?) and read it at home?
I'm currently packaging the DECnet progs and they are dependant on a 2.4 kernel,
is there any recommended way to enforce this or should I just put a check in the
startup script and a note in the description?
Another thing it does is to change the MAC address of any/all ethernet cards in
the
Another thing it does is to change the MAC address of any/all ethernet cards
in the system (requiring a reboot).
Why do you need to reboot just to change the MAC?
Eric
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Description:
Z81/Z81txt/xz81 are ZX81 (TS1000) and ZX80 emulators
for (respectively) svgalib, text mode, and X. They
load/save Xtender-format .P files, and support the
ZX81's pseudo-hi-res mode. A few ZX81-related utils,
GIFs of the keyboard
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 08:13:57AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
You should always be able to backport a patch. If not, I'm sorry, but that
this should be one quality of a Debian maintainer, you lack something...
You must be kidding. We can't expect from any maintainer the ability
to be able
Drew Parsons wrote:
Anyway, I tried also using dpkg-statoverride in postinst to set the mode for
/usr/lib/games/mirrormagic, not just /var/lib... and do get the same problem:
warning: --update given but /usr/lib/games/mirrormagic does not exist
So does that mean this part of the problem is
Torsten == Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Torsten On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 08:13:57AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
You should always be able to backport a patch. If not, I'm sorry, but that
this should be one quality of a Debian maintainer, you lack something...
Torsten You
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 03:35:53PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Have we accepted that mediocrity is really our lot? What
happened to the quest for excellence? I joined an effort to create
the *BEST* distribution of linux, not merely a feel good, prolific
one.
How about accepting
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 02:54:34PM +, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
I'm currently packaging the DECnet progs and they are dependant on a 2.4
kernel,
is there any recommended way to enforce this or should I just put a check in
the
startup script and a note in the description?
Another thing
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:08:22PM -0600, Gordon Sadler wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 02:54:34PM +, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
I'm currently packaging the DECnet progs and they are dependant on a 2.4
kernel,
is there any recommended way to enforce this or should I just put a check
in
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 10:12:56AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing it does is to change the MAC address of any/all ethernet
cards
in the system (requiring a reboot).
Why do you need to reboot just to change the MAC?
Yeah, I would think bringing the interfaces down and
* Martin == Martin Albert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
So recipient has to use patch -p1 (or rename his archive) right?
Do you tell them or just let'em figure it out?
You can expect that every developer knows how to use patch and that he
will first inspect the file you sent him before
Marcus == Marcus Brinkmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marcus On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 03:35:53PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Have we accepted that mediocrity is really our lot? What
happened to the quest for excellence? I joined an effort to create
the *BEST* distribution of linux, not
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 08:47:34PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
No, Marcus. Mediocrity is not synonymous with inexperience --
I know a number of excellent people who would readily admit that
they do not know a field.
You are loosing me. I have lost track of what you want to say,
Hi fokes.
I know that /. has got a big thing about setting up a linux based set
top box... but I'm just wondering, has anyone worked on the emdebian
project here?? hows it going?? would it be easy to port that to higher
speced hardware, and set it up for set top use (i.e play
35 matches
Mail list logo
