On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 11:44:50PM +0200, Carlos Prados wrote:
My question is, can I just modify the maintainer field with "Carlos Prados
[EMAIL PROTECTED]" or even "Carlos Prados [EMAIL PROTECTED]" in the
next update of my packages? Or will this appear like an NMU?
No, just go ahead and
My point was, auto-replies to lists suck. And, btw, anyone can gain this
"sensitive information" just by posting to -firewall.
But don't tell the _list_ that these buggy auto-replys suck.
Anybody who posts to the list will find out himself.
Tell the person who has this buggy autoreply to get
I'm part if a project team trying to develop a hardware
software system designed to efficiently make use of
donated equipment for distribution to non-profits, NGOs,
developing cultures, to cross the digital divide as
cheaply as possible.
Part of the project is the design of an open architecture
Some of us are involved in the design of an
upgrade kit for donated computers for distribution
to non-profits, NGOs, schools, etc.
We are in email with motherboard/CPU OEMs to have a
motherboard created which can make the best possible
use of the heritage equipment which is donated, on
the least
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:09:51PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
W: ktouch: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory
usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ktouch/.anchors
N:
N: package contains a file which is empty
N:
Well, this ought to be obvious: is the file empty? :-)
Actually, there is a
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 09:37:49PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:09:51PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
W: ktouch: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory
usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ktouch/.anchors
N:
N: package contains a file which is empty
N:
Well, this
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 09:06:37PM +0200, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Changes to /etc/init.d/networking
snip sensitive info
Sorry, this belongs on debian-firewall.
No it doesn't, and for two reasons.
First off probably nobody around here is
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 11:44:50PM +0200, Carlos Prados wrote:
My question is, can I just modify the maintainer field with Carlos Prados
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or even Carlos Prados [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the
next update of my packages? Or will this appear like an NMU?
No, just go ahead and change
Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All in all, Depends: tclsh | tcl8.2 should generally work [...]
Note that lintian complains about depending only on a virtual package, and
while a quick glance doesn't find language in policy which forbids it, that
is just a quick glance ;).
The real
My point was, auto-replies to lists suck. And, btw, anyone can gain this
sensitive information just by posting to -firewall.
But don't tell the _list_ that these buggy auto-replys suck.
Anybody who posts to the list will find out himself.
Tell the person who has this buggy autoreply to get a
Fredrik Steen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm packaging wmix and now the upstream authour has decided to change
the name a bit from: wmix-2.11-oss.tar.gz to: wmix-2.2.tar.gz
The package is named wmix should this namechange be any problem or do
I just need to upgrade the wmix package with the
I'm part if a project team trying to develop a hardware
software system designed to efficiently make use of
donated equipment for distribution to non-profits, NGOs,
developing cultures, to cross the digital divide as
cheaply as possible.
Part of the project is the design of an open architecture
Some of us are involved in the design of an
upgrade kit for donated computers for distribution
to non-profits, NGOs, schools, etc.
We are in email with motherboard/CPU OEMs to have a
motherboard created which can make the best possible
use of the heritage equipment which is donated, on
the least
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:09:51PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
W: ktouch: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory
usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ktouch/.anchors
N:
N: package contains a file which is empty
N:
Well, this ought to be obvious: is the file empty? :-)
Actually, there is a bug
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 04:38:54AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the problem. First you should stop the line wrap. Ending the
paragraph with ... makes dpkg-source think that a second paragraph is
forthcoming. Remove the 3 periods.
Thanks for your reply. It didn't help though (or
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 09:37:49PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:09:51PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
W: ktouch: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory
usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ktouch/.anchors
N:
N: package contains a file which is empty
N:
Well, this
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 08:06:02PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
And note that hard links are forbidden by policy.
Ah! I looked for that bit of policy a few months ago, and couldn't find it.
Where did you find it?
Searched for the word hard in
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.text.gz.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 02:17:44AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 08:06:02PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
And note that hard links are forbidden by policy.
Ah! I looked for that bit of policy a few months ago, and couldn't find it.
Where did you find it?
18 matches
Mail list logo
