variable path names in manpages

2001-05-10 Thread Manfred Wassmann
Hi, I'm currently writing a manpage which is to be used in a Debian package, but not exclusively. To be most flexible I want to use variables for path names that are expanded at build time. Is there any standard or recommended way implement this? -- Manfred Wassmann PGP and GnuPG public

Re: variable path names in manpages

2001-05-10 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Manfred! You wrote: I'm currently writing a manpage which is to be used in a Debian package, but not exclusively. To be most flexible I want to use variables for path names that are expanded at build time. Is there any standard or recommended way implement this? Well, you could just

Re: variable path names in manpages

2001-05-10 Thread Ove Kaaven
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Manfred Wassmann wrote: I'm currently writing a manpage which is to be used in a Debian package, but not exclusively. To be most flexible I want to use variables for path names that are expanded at build time. Is there any standard or recommended way implement this?

Re: How to locally sign a package that has been built on another machine?

2001-05-10 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do I need to install non-free software if I want to sign packages on potato? Neither gpg (with or without RSA) nor the RSA module are non-DFSG, today, even if one is still sitting in non-free. Anyway, unless your key is RSA, you don't need the module for

Re: How to locally sign a package that has been built on another machine?

2001-05-10 Thread James Troup
Robert Bihlmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Since there is no /usr/lib/gnupg/rsa in unstable, would backporting the unstable gnupg to potato solve this? Yes, sid's gnupg includes RSA. Err, huh? potato (2.2r3 at least) has gnupg 1.0.4-1 which includes RSA. -- James -- To

My First Package. Wheee.

2001-05-10 Thread Warren Anthony Stramiello
Howdy ya'll ;-) I've finished packaging my first package for inclusion in Debian now that I finally got accepted as a maintainer. It's XDrawChem, a linux version of ChemDraw, a fairly necessary app for chemistry folks (at least so my girlfriend tells me, and she's a chemistry major here at

Re: My First Package. Wheee.

2001-05-10 Thread Michael Janssen (CS/MATH stud.)
In Warren Anthony Stramiello's email, 10-05-2001: Howdy ya'll ;-) I've finished packaging my first package for inclusion in Debian now that I finally got accepted as a maintainer. It's XDrawChem, a linux version of ChemDraw, a fairly necessary app for chemistry folks (at least so my

Re: Creating man pages (upstream does not have one)

2001-05-10 Thread Warren Anthony Stramiello
When you use debmake (the first thing you run on the clean source dir, if I'm not mistaken), it will create the debian directory. Check in there for a manpage.1.ex file that serves as a good template for the process. ~Warren -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: Creating man pages (upstream does not have one)

2001-05-10 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Eduardo Trapani wrote: The software I am packaging does not have a man page. What programs should I use to create one? I usually just edit one directly (in roff). I'm pretty sure dh_make installs a sample. If it doesn't, look at /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/debian/manpage.1.ex There's

Re: Creating man pages (upstream does not have one)

2001-05-10 Thread Falk Hueffner
Eduardo Trapani [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The software I am packaging does not have a man page. What programs should I use to create one? Try using help2man to get a good template, and edit it by hand. Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: Creating man pages (upstream does not have one)

2001-05-10 Thread Othmar Pasteka
hi, On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 03:52:30PM -0300, Eduardo Trapani wrote: What programs should I use to create one? the normal groff and the an macro (on the commandline that's the -man ;)) ... read the manpage howto as a start and also read man 7 man ... so long Othmar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Creating man pages (upstream does not have one)

2001-05-10 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Eduardo Trapani [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The software I am packaging does not have a man page. What programs should I use to create one? I would recommend to write them in the POD (Plain Old Documentation) format which makes it very seasy to write/update a man page. (see

Re: Creating man pages (upstream does not have one)

2001-05-10 Thread Othmar Pasteka
hi, On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 09:42:51PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: I would recommend to write them in the POD (Plain Old Documentation) format which makes it very seasy to write/update a man page. (see http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html for pointers to documentations). haven't dealt

Re: Creating man pages (upstream does not have one)

2001-05-10 Thread Luis Arocha -data-
Y el jueves 10 de mayo, Eduardo Trapani escribió: The software I am packaging does not have a man page. What programs should I use to create one? Thanks, Eduardo. My suggestion: Use perldoc, you will write a txt file like this and you will get a pretty manpage with only one command:

Re: How to locally sign a package that has been built on another machine?

2001-05-10 Thread Marc Haber
On 10 May 2001 14:58:35 +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe removing a stray load-extension rsa is enough? Yes. Thanks. Greetings Marc -- -- !! No courtesy copies, please !! - Marc Haber |Questions are the |

Override problem, help me please

2001-05-10 Thread Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez
Hello, I uploaded a new revision of my packeg hptalx and I'd just received the following message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] which I don't understand: -- There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the override file for the following file(s): hptalx_1.1.0-2_i386.deb:

Re: [users] Re: Where's lame

2001-05-10 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:43:46AM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote: [...] It can be debianised, but it can't be included in debian, since it can't be legally redistributed in binary form. What do you mean ?? There are lots of packages included in debian in source form ... Why

Re: variable path names in manpages

2001-05-10 Thread Manfred Wassmann
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Ove Kaaven wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2001, Manfred Wassmann wrote: I'm currently writing a manpage which is to be used in a Debian package, but not exclusively. To be most flexible I want to use variables for path names that are expanded at build time. Is there any

perl modules - building debs

2001-05-10 Thread Derek Evan Mart
After several hours attempting to build debian packages for perl modules and twenty minutes searching google for helpful documentation, I have come to the conclusion that I have no frelling idea what I am doing. =) I read that there is a perl module that would build a package from any module on

Re: [users] Re: Where's lame

2001-05-10 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Eric == Eric Van Buggenhaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Eric : it can't be included in debian, since it can't be legally Eric redistributed in binary form. Eric First part of the sentence might be correct, but not for *that* reason. Any package that cannot be distributed in the binary

Re: USA crypto rules and libssl-dependent packages

2001-05-10 Thread Brian Ristuccia
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 07:27:44PM -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote: Hi. I am a novice Debian package maintainer, in the queue for becoming an official developer. I am maintaining a package called althea, which is an IMAP email client for GTK+. They have recently added support for SSL through

USA crypto rules and libssl-dependent packages

2001-05-10 Thread Jimmy Kaplowitz
Hi. I am a novice Debian package maintainer, in the queue for becoming an official developer. I am maintaining a package called althea, which is an IMAP email client for GTK+. They have recently added support for SSL through linking to libssl (from OpenSSL). This is configurable based on the

Re: How to locally sign a package that has been built on another machine?

2001-05-10 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, 7 May 2001 21:49:12 +0200, Filip Van Raemdonck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The tools available for automatic changes signing seem to do this for you. Yes, they do. Judging from the debsign source, this is a gpg issue. However, debsign fails for me because gpg returns some strange error

variable path names in manpages

2001-05-10 Thread Manfred Wassmann
Hi, I'm currently writing a manpage which is to be used in a Debian package, but not exclusively. To be most flexible I want to use variables for path names that are expanded at build time. Is there any standard or recommended way implement this? -- Manfred Wassmann PGP and GnuPG public

Re: variable path names in manpages

2001-05-10 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Manfred! You wrote: I'm currently writing a manpage which is to be used in a Debian package, but not exclusively. To be most flexible I want to use variables for path names that are expanded at build time. Is there any standard or recommended way implement this? Well, you could just

Re: variable path names in manpages

2001-05-10 Thread Ove Kaaven
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Manfred Wassmann wrote: I'm currently writing a manpage which is to be used in a Debian package, but not exclusively. To be most flexible I want to use variables for path names that are expanded at build time. Is there any standard or recommended way implement this?

Re: How to locally sign a package that has been built on another machine?

2001-05-10 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do I need to install non-free software if I want to sign packages on potato? Neither gpg (with or without RSA) nor the RSA module are non-DFSG, today, even if one is still sitting in non-free. Anyway, unless your key is RSA, you don't need the module for

Re: How to locally sign a package that has been built on another machine?

2001-05-10 Thread James Troup
Robert Bihlmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Since there is no /usr/lib/gnupg/rsa in unstable, would backporting the unstable gnupg to potato solve this? Yes, sid's gnupg includes RSA. Err, huh? potato (2.2r3 at least) has gnupg 1.0.4-1 which includes RSA. -- James

My First Package. Wheee.

2001-05-10 Thread Warren Anthony Stramiello
Howdy ya'll ;-) I've finished packaging my first package for inclusion in Debian now that I finally got accepted as a maintainer. It's XDrawChem, a linux version of ChemDraw, a fairly necessary app for chemistry folks (at least so my girlfriend tells me, and she's a chemistry major here at

Re: My First Package. Wheee.

2001-05-10 Thread Michael Janssen \(CS/MATH stud.\)
In Warren Anthony Stramiello's email, 10-05-2001: Howdy ya'll ;-) I've finished packaging my first package for inclusion in Debian now that I finally got accepted as a maintainer. It's XDrawChem, a linux version of ChemDraw, a fairly necessary app for chemistry folks (at least so my

Re: My First Package. Wheee.

2001-05-10 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Warren Anthony Stramiello | a) inclusion in the testing distribution, if still possible Is handled automagically, if you haven't screwed up anything ;) (that is, it goes into testing after 10 days of testing in unstable, unless it has RC bugs, that is). Read more at

Creating man pages (upstream does not have one)

2001-05-10 Thread Eduardo Trapani
The software I am packaging does not have a man page. What programs should I use to create one? Thanks, Eduardo.

Re: Creating man pages (upstream does not have one)

2001-05-10 Thread Warren Anthony Stramiello
When you use debmake (the first thing you run on the clean source dir, if I'm not mistaken), it will create the debian directory. Check in there for a manpage.1.ex file that serves as a good template for the process. ~Warren

Re: Creating man pages (upstream does not have one)

2001-05-10 Thread Sami Haahtinen
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 03:52:30PM -0300, Eduardo Trapani wrote: The software I am packaging does not have a man page. What programs should I use to create one? the best, but definitely not the easiest one, is to just get an example page and edit it by hand. there are programs like manedit

Re: Creating man pages (upstream does not have one)

2001-05-10 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Eduardo Trapani wrote: The software I am packaging does not have a man page. What programs should I use to create one? I usually just edit one directly (in roff). I'm pretty sure dh_make installs a sample. If it doesn't, look at /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/debian/manpage.1.ex There's

Re: Creating man pages (upstream does not have one)

2001-05-10 Thread Falk Hueffner
Eduardo Trapani [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The software I am packaging does not have a man page. What programs should I use to create one? Try using help2man to get a good template, and edit it by hand. Falk

Re: Creating man pages (upstream does not have one)

2001-05-10 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Eduardo Trapani [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The software I am packaging does not have a man page. What programs should I use to create one? I would recommend to write them in the POD (Plain Old Documentation) format which makes it very seasy to write/update a man page. (see

Re: Creating man pages (upstream does not have one)

2001-05-10 Thread Othmar Pasteka
hi, On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 09:42:51PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: I would recommend to write them in the POD (Plain Old Documentation) format which makes it very seasy to write/update a man page. (see http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html for pointers to documentations). haven't dealt

Re: Creating man pages (upstream does not have one)

2001-05-10 Thread Luis Arocha -data-
Y el jueves 10 de mayo, Eduardo Trapani escribió: The software I am packaging does not have a man page. What programs should I use to create one? Thanks, Eduardo. My suggestion: Use perldoc, you will write a txt file like this and you will get a pretty manpage with only one command:

USA crypto rules and libssl-dependent packages

2001-05-10 Thread Jimmy Kaplowitz
Hi. I am a novice Debian package maintainer, in the queue for becoming an official developer. I am maintaining a package called althea, which is an IMAP email client for GTK+. They have recently added support for SSL through linking to libssl (from OpenSSL). This is configurable based on the

Re: [users] Re: Where's lame

2001-05-10 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:43:46AM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote: [...] It can be debianised, but it can't be included in debian, since it can't be legally redistributed in binary form. What do you mean ?? There are lots of packages included in debian in source form ... Why

Re: Override problem, help me please

2001-05-10 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Javier Vi uales Guti rrez wrote: Hello, I uploaded a new revision of my packeg hptalx and I'd just received the following message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] which I don't understand: I've been getting a rash of them lately. I'm guessing either packages have moved, or they've recently begun

Re: variable path names in manpages

2001-05-10 Thread Manfred Wassmann
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Ove Kaaven wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2001, Manfred Wassmann wrote: I'm currently writing a manpage which is to be used in a Debian package, but not exclusively. To be most flexible I want to use variables for path names that are expanded at build time. Is there any

perl modules - building debs

2001-05-10 Thread Derek Evan Mart
After several hours attempting to build debian packages for perl modules and twenty minutes searching google for helpful documentation, I have come to the conclusion that I have no frelling idea what I am doing. =) I read that there is a perl module that would build a package from any module on