On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 10:50:18AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:44:46PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote:
>
> Hi, (Remi? Rimi? mutt doesn't display the second character, as you can see).
Yes it does. You probably haven't set your locale to see it.
[The '?' in R?mi, above, is
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:44:46PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote:
> I recently upload a new package called libglade-perl. After some mail
> exchange with the upstream maintainer (Dermot Musgrove
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), he say that libglade-perl is not
> a library and he ask me to change the name of the
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 10:50:18AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:44:46PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote:
>
> Hi, (Remi? Rimi? mutt doesn't display the second character, as you can see).
Yes it does. You probably haven't set your locale to see it.
[The '?' in R?mi, above, is
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:44:46PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote:
> PS: here is part of the dpkg-dev -c result of libglade-perl
> ...
> -rw-r--r-- root/root 74828 2001-02-10 17:07:33
> ./usr/lib/perl5/Glade/PerlUIGtk.pm
[...]
> -rw-r--r-- root/root 43005 2001-02-10 17:07:33
> ./usr/lib/perl5/G
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:44:46PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote:
> I recently upload a new package called libglade-perl. After some mail
> exchange with the upstream maintainer (Dermot Musgrove
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), he say that libglade-perl is not
> a library and he ask me to change the name of the
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 10:04:45PM +0200, Michael Wiedmann wrote:
> What is the proposed handling of a package whose name has changed?
> (e.g.: the author of foo-0.1.tar.gz, Debian package foo_0.1-1_i386.deb,
> changes the name of the package to bar-0.2.tar.gz)
>
> The only thing which comes to m
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:44:46PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote:
> PS: here is part of the dpkg-dev -c result of libglade-perl
> ...
> -rw-r--r-- root/root 74828 2001-02-10 17:07:33 ./usr/lib/perl5/Glade/PerlUIGtk.pm
[...]
> -rw-r--r-- root/root 43005 2001-02-10 17:07:33
>./usr/lib/perl5/Glad
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 10:04:45PM +0200, Michael Wiedmann wrote:
> What is the proposed handling of a package whose name has changed?
> (e.g.: the author of foo-0.1.tar.gz, Debian package foo_0.1-1_i386.deb,
> changes the name of the package to bar-0.2.tar.gz)
>
> The only thing which comes to
I recently upload a new package called libglade-perl. After some mail
exchange with the upstream maintainer (Dermot Musgrove
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), he say that libglade-perl is not
a library and he ask me to change the name of the package to glade-perl.
He is not wrong since in fact it is a perl ge
What is the proposed handling of a package whose name has changed?
(e.g.: the author of foo-0.1.tar.gz, Debian package foo_0.1-1_i386.deb,
changes the name of the package to bar-0.2.tar.gz)
The only thing which comes to my mind is treating the old package
as 'conflict' for the new one, but there
I recently upload a new package called libglade-perl. After some mail
exchange with the upstream maintainer (Dermot Musgrove
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), he say that libglade-perl is not
a library and he ask me to change the name of the package to glade-perl.
He is not wrong since in fact it is a perl g
What is the proposed handling of a package whose name has changed?
(e.g.: the author of foo-0.1.tar.gz, Debian package foo_0.1-1_i386.deb,
changes the name of the package to bar-0.2.tar.gz)
The only thing which comes to my mind is treating the old package
as 'conflict' for the new one, but there
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 10:13:13PM +0530, Viral wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a package, vcdimager, which doesn't build on the arm architecture,
> because of the way gcc handles bitfields on arm.
>
> It is non-trivial to fix this problem right away, so I would like to know
> what is a good thing to do
Hi,
I have a package, vcdimager, which doesn't build on the arm architecture,
because of the way gcc handles bitfields on arm.
It is non-trivial to fix this problem right away, so I would like to know
what is a good thing to do.
Is it ok, to put the rest of the architectures in the Architecture
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 10:13:13PM +0530, Viral wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a package, vcdimager, which doesn't build on the arm architecture,
> because of the way gcc handles bitfields on arm.
>
> It is non-trivial to fix this problem right away, so I would like to know
> what is a good thing to d
Hi,
I have a package, vcdimager, which doesn't build on the arm architecture,
because of the way gcc handles bitfields on arm.
It is non-trivial to fix this problem right away, so I would like to know
what is a good thing to do.
Is it ok, to put the rest of the architectures in the Architectur
On Sat, 26 May 2001 09:13:48 -0400
Chris Danis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|> On Sat, 26 May 2001, "Colin" == Colin Fowler wrote:
|
| Colin> Hi all, well as the subject line says I'm interested in
| Colin> maintaining some Debian Packages and have signed up at
| Colin> http://www.internati
> On Sat, 26 May 2001, "Colin" == Colin Fowler wrote:
Colin> Hi all, well as the subject line says I'm interested in
Colin> maintaining some Debian Packages and have signed up at
Colin> http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/. Now
Colin> unfortunately I dont know any oth
Hi all,
well as the subject line says I'm interested in maintaining some
Debian Packages and have signed up at
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/.
Now unfortunately I dont know any other Debian Developers so I hope this is
the right place to ask for assistance.
Basical
On Sat, 26 May 2001 09:13:48 -0400
Chris Danis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|> On Sat, 26 May 2001, "Colin" == Colin Fowler wrote:
|
| Colin> Hi all, well as the subject line says I'm interested in
| Colin> maintaining some Debian Packages and have signed up at
| Colin> http://www.internat
> On Sat, 26 May 2001, "Colin" == Colin Fowler wrote:
Colin> Hi all, well as the subject line says I'm interested in
Colin> maintaining some Debian Packages and have signed up at
Colin> http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/. Now
Colin> unfortunately I dont know any ot
Hi all,
well as the subject line says I'm interested in maintaining some
Debian Packages and have signed up at
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/.
Now unfortunately I dont know any other Debian Developers so I hope this is
the right place to ask for assistance.
Basica
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 02:05:05PM +0200, Alwyn Schoeman wrote:
> fakeroot debian/rules clean works!
>
> Is this standard way of cleaning up the build directories?
Yes.
If you want to do it by running dh_clean directly, try doing this:
$ DH_COMPAT=3 dh_clean
This will run dh_clean in debhelp
23 matches
Mail list logo
