Re: Should libfile-temp-perl be removed ?

Julian Gilbey wrote: > > I'm currently the Maintainer of libfile-temp-perl which as of perl 5.6.1 is > > included in the main Perl distribution. As the package is now redundant > > should I file a bug against ftp.debian.org asking for it's removal. > > Or replace it by a dummy package which says

Re: Should libfile-temp-perl be removed ?

On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 02:31:30PM +0100, Jon Middleton wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently the Maintainer of libfile-temp-perl which as of perl 5.6.1 is > included in the main Perl distribution. As the package is now redundant > should I file a bug against ftp.debian.org asking for it's removal. Or

Re: Should libfile-temp-perl be removed ?

Julian Gilbey wrote: > > I'm currently the Maintainer of libfile-temp-perl which as of perl 5.6.1 is > > included in the main Perl distribution. As the package is now redundant > > should I file a bug against ftp.debian.org asking for it's removal. > > Or replace it by a dummy package which say

Re: Should libfile-temp-perl be removed ?

On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 02:31:30PM +0100, Jon Middleton wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently the Maintainer of libfile-temp-perl which as of perl 5.6.1 is > included in the main Perl distribution. As the package is now redundant > should I file a bug against ftp.debian.org asking for it's removal. O