Re: GDBM 1.8

2001-06-11 Thread Jon Eisenstein
> > For a package I'd like to make, I need gdbm 1.8.0, while the current > > maintainer has stated that he will not upgrade to this version, and that > > if I need it I should package it myself. So, here I am, packaging the > > library. What should I do to make sure that it does not interfere with

Re: GDBM 1.8

2001-06-11 Thread Jon Eisenstein
> > For a package I'd like to make, I need gdbm 1.8.0, while the current > > maintainer has stated that he will not upgrade to this version, and that > > if I need it I should package it myself. So, here I am, packaging the > > library. What should I do to make sure that it does not interfere with

Re: GDBM 1.8

2001-06-11 Thread James Troup
Jon Eisenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For a package I'd like to make, I need gdbm 1.8.0, while the current > maintainer has stated that he will not upgrade to this version, and that > if I need it I should package it myself. So, here I am, packaging the > library. What should I do to make s

GDBM 1.8

2001-06-11 Thread Jon Eisenstein
For a package I'd like to make, I need gdbm 1.8.0, while the current maintainer has stated that he will not upgrade to this version, and that if I need it I should package it myself. So, here I am, packaging the library. What should I do to make sure that it does not interfere with the regular gdbm

Re: GDBM 1.8

2001-06-11 Thread James Troup
Jon Eisenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For a package I'd like to make, I need gdbm 1.8.0, while the current > maintainer has stated that he will not upgrade to this version, and that > if I need it I should package it myself. So, here I am, packaging the > library. What should I do to make

GDBM 1.8

2001-06-11 Thread Jon Eisenstein
For a package I'd like to make, I need gdbm 1.8.0, while the current maintainer has stated that he will not upgrade to this version, and that if I need it I should package it myself. So, here I am, packaging the library. What should I do to make sure that it does not interfere with the regular gdb

Re: Requesting removal of new-maintainer application?

2001-06-11 Thread Michèl Alexandre Salim
--- Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Removed. Thanks Michel Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie

Re: Requesting removal of new-maintainer application?

2001-06-11 Thread Michèl Alexandre Salim
--- Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Removed. Thanks Michel Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Re: creating a pakage with 2 binaries

2001-06-11 Thread Nikolaus Regnat
Has someone a solution for my installation problem? Compilation and building went fine, but I don´t know how the command for the installation should look like. $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/pakage <- already works $(MAKE) -C subdir/ install prefix=?