>>"Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> The Web of Trust necessarily depends on participants acting
Steve> out of enlightened self-interest. IMHO, signing a public key
Steve> of somebody who's already lost the private key is much less of
Steve> a concern than signing th
>>"Jimmy" == Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jimmy> I noticed in your protocol that you say the name on the IDs
Jimmy> must match the name on the key. When I had my key signed, I
Jimmy> showed ID that had the name "James Kaplowitz", which is my
Jimmy> legal name. On my key, I had t
>>"Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robbe> Re-read what I said: while I don't care about others signing
Robbe> additional ids, I consider ids not signed by the key highly dubious.
Robbe> Your compromiser can't add self-signed ids to a public key unless he
Robbe> holds the
Hey there,
I maintain the lids packages for the debian distribution and I am working on
a lids-configurationtool so this becomes more easy to manage for users.
What I want to know is, is it allowed to have a configtool, which modifies
initscripts and configfiles owned by other packages?
so long..
>>"Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> The Web of Trust necessarily depends on participants acting
Steve> out of enlightened self-interest. IMHO, signing a public key
Steve> of somebody who's already lost the private key is much less of
Steve> a concern than signing t
>>"Jimmy" == Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jimmy> I noticed in your protocol that you say the name on the IDs
Jimmy> must match the name on the key. When I had my key signed, I
Jimmy> showed ID that had the name "James Kaplowitz", which is my
Jimmy> legal name. On my key, I had
>>"Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robbe> Re-read what I said: while I don't care about others signing
Robbe> additional ids, I consider ids not signed by the key highly dubious.
Robbe> Your compromiser can't add self-signed ids to a public key unless he
Robbe> holds th
Hey there,
I maintain the lids packages for the debian distribution and I am working on
a lids-configurationtool so this becomes more easy to manage for users.
What I want to know is, is it allowed to have a configtool, which modifies
initscripts and configfiles owned by other packages?
so long.
Em Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:34:59 +0200 (CEST)
"T.Pospisek's MailLists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> If you come up with somethink slightly general I'd be interested in it. I
> (am trying to) maintain xxdiff a graphical diff programm which will only
> start if it is passed two files as argument.
hmm
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can not unpack my own packages anymore... where is the bug, in
> dpkg-source, in tar, or in my box?
Upgrade to dpkg-dev >= 1.9.15 or downgrade to <= 1.9.10. Usual dpkg SNAFU.
--
James
Hi,
I have a little problem with dpkg-source (or tar?), was there a change
recently?
dpkg-source -x hp2xx_3.4.0-2.dsc
dpkg-source: error: tarfile `./hp2xx_3.4.0.orig.tar.gz' contains unexpected
object listed by tar as `drwxr-xr-x mk/users 0 2001-02-08 14:30:12
hp2xx-3.4.0/'; expected
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Indeed, it might be useful to have more of this
> second class of ignoramus running around posting their
> signed private keys to Usenet; perhaps this way, the
> PGP community will begin to seriously deal with the
> non-transitive nature of trust on a large scale.
H...
Em Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:34:59 +0200 (CEST)
"T.Pospisek's MailLists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> If you come up with somethink slightly general I'd be interested in it. I
> (am trying to) maintain xxdiff a graphical diff programm which will only
> start if it is passed two files as argument.
hm
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can not unpack my own packages anymore... where is the bug, in
> dpkg-source, in tar, or in my box?
Upgrade to dpkg-dev >= 1.9.15 or downgrade to <= 1.9.10. Usual dpkg SNAFU.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Hi,
I have a little problem with dpkg-source (or tar?), was there a change
recently?
dpkg-source -x hp2xx_3.4.0-2.dsc
dpkg-source: error: tarfile `./hp2xx_3.4.0.orig.tar.gz' contains unexpected object
listed by tar as `drwxr-xr-x mk/users 0 2001-02-08 14:30:12 hp2xx-3.4.0/';
expected
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Indeed, it might be useful to have more of this
> second class of ignoramus running around posting their
> signed private keys to Usenet; perhaps this way, the
> PGP community will begin to seriously deal with the
> non-transitive nature of trust on a large scale.
H..
If you haven't found a sponsor yet, I'd be glad to take a look. Just get back
to me and tell me that this is the case. I'm rather new to Debian myself (just
joined in May), but I am familiar with the packaging rules so I should be able
to do this.
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jul 0
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Are you implying that ensuring the person whose identity you
> >> verified actually controls the email address and the secret pass
> >> phrase adds no value to the web of trust?
> Stev
If you haven't found a sponsor yet, I'd be glad to take a look. Just get back
to me and tell me that this is the case. I'm rather new to Debian myself (just
joined in May), but I am familiar with the packaging rules so I should be able
to do this.
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jul
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Are you implying that ensuring the person whose identity you
> >> verified actually controls the email address and the secret pass
> >> phrase adds no value to the web of trust?
> Ste
20 matches
Mail list logo
