I think it becomes part of stable automaticly when the current unstable
changes into stable. Security upgrades are the only exception I know of.
Britton Kerin
__
GNU GPL: "The Source will be with you... always."
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Robin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What are the conditions for a package t
Hi,
What are the conditions for a package to be included in stable?
I have looked through the policy document to find any clues on this but
I couldn't find anything.
Currently, I maintain the kvirc (and kvirc-doc, kvirc-dev) packages
which have been in unstable since June 20 this year. There are
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:49:51PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> How do I get dpkg-buildpackage not to re-build the source tarball when
> building a native package? No matter what I do, it rebuilds it, which
> prevents me from keeping the tarball I created from my CVS tree, which
> also i
peter karlsson wrote:
> How do I get dpkg-buildpackage not to re-build the source tarball when
> building a native package? No matter what I do, it rebuilds it, which
> prevents me from keeping the tarball I created from my CVS tree, which
> also is what I distribute elsewhere.
I would first creat
I think it becomes part of stable automaticly when the current unstable
changes into stable. Security upgrades are the only exception I know of.
Britton Kerin
__
GNU GPL: "The Source will be with you... always."
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Robin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What are the conditions for a package
You probably don't want to do this... since a native package has no
.diff.gz, the source tarball must contain everything used to generate the
set of binary packages you're uploading.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:49:51PM +0200, peter karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
spake forth:
> Hi!
>
> How do I get
Hi,
What are the conditions for a package to be included in stable?
I have looked through the policy document to find any clues on this but
I couldn't find anything.
Currently, I maintain the kvirc (and kvirc-doc, kvirc-dev) packages
which have been in unstable since June 20 this year. There are
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, peter karlsson wrote:
> How do I get dpkg-buildpackage not to re-build the source tarball when
> building a native package? No matter what I do, it rebuilds it, which
> prevents me from keeping the tarball I created from my CVS tree, which
> also is what I distribute elsewhere.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:49:51PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> How do I get dpkg-buildpackage not to re-build the source tarball when
> building a native package? No matter what I do, it rebuilds it, which
> prevents me from keeping the tarball I created from my CVS tree, which
> also
Hi!
How do I get dpkg-buildpackage not to re-build the source tarball when
building a native package? No matter what I do, it rebuilds it, which
prevents me from keeping the tarball I created from my CVS tree, which
also is what I distribute elsewhere.
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se
peter karlsson wrote:
> How do I get dpkg-buildpackage not to re-build the source tarball when
> building a native package? No matter what I do, it rebuilds it, which
> prevents me from keeping the tarball I created from my CVS tree, which
> also is what I distribute elsewhere.
I would first crea
You probably don't want to do this... since a native package has no
.diff.gz, the source tarball must contain everything used to generate the
set of binary packages you're uploading.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:49:51PM +0200, peter karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
spake forth:
> Hi!
>
> How do I get
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, peter karlsson wrote:
> How do I get dpkg-buildpackage not to re-build the source tarball when
> building a native package? No matter what I do, it rebuilds it, which
> prevents me from keeping the tarball I created from my CVS tree, which
> also is what I distribute elsewhere
also sprach Colin Watson (on Wed, 05 Sep 2001 11:36:24AM -0500):
> Can you describe how this package differs from shaperd?
>
> Package: shaperd
> Description: A user-mode traffic shaper for tcp-ip networks.
> Shaperd is a user-mode program that can shape traffic passing through
> a Linux box. As
Hi!
How do I get dpkg-buildpackage not to re-build the source tarball when
building a native package? No matter what I do, it rebuilds it, which
prevents me from keeping the tarball I created from my CVS tree, which
also is what I distribute elsewhere.
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.s
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 06:59:08PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
> well, it doesn't need netfilter or anything. you basically say
> something like
>
> iprelay -b 2048 10873:ftp.us.debian.org:873
>
> and now 0.0.0.0:10873 is a port through which you can access
> ftp.us.debian.org:873 with at most
also sprach Colin Watson (on Wed, 05 Sep 2001 11:36:24AM -0500):
> Can you describe how this package differs from shaperd?
>
> Package: shaperd
> Description: A user-mode traffic shaper for tcp-ip networks.
> Shaperd is a user-mode program that can shape traffic passing through
> a Linux box. A
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 05:12:56PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
> I packaged iprelay from http://www.stewart.com.au/ip_relay/ and now I
> need a sponsor. Here is a short description of the program, from the
> webpage:
>
> ip_relay can shape the TCP traffic forwarded through it to a specified
> ba
Hi,
I packaged iprelay from http://www.stewart.com.au/ip_relay/ and now I
need a sponsor. Here is a short description of the program, from the
webpage:
ip_relay can shape the TCP traffic forwarded through it to a specified
bandwidth and allow this specified bandwidth to be changed on-the-fly.
Mul
Hi,
I packaged iprelay from http://www.stewart.com.au/ip_relay/ and now I
need a sponsor. Here is a short description of the program, from the
webpage:
ip_relay can shape the TCP traffic forwarded through it to a specified
bandwidth and allow this specified bandwidth to be changed on-the-fly.
Mu
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | This code is EXTREMELY EXPERIMENTAL, and may well result in a |
>
> Should this warning determine that this software should stay in
> 'unstable' and not get into 'testing' untill they make a stable
> release?
IMHO no. People will file bugs if it
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | This code is EXTREMELY EXPERIMENTAL, and may well result in a |
>
> Should this warning determine that this software should stay in
> 'unstable' and not get into 'testing' untill they make a stable
> release?
IMHO no. People will file bugs if it
22 matches
Mail list logo
