Hi,
i´ve packaged eroaster (a cdrecord frontend) and gkrellm-gnome (a plugin for
gkrellm that adds gnome support). I also plan to package 3 perl modules.
The packages can be found at www.blendi.org/debian/
I am searching for a debian developer who is willing to sponsor and advocate
me.
Martin
Hi Christian!
You wrote:
Operator or semicolon missing before supported at (eval 115) line 1.
Ambiguous use of resolved as operator at (eval 115) line 1.
Unquoted string supported may clash with future reserved word at (eval
112) line 1.
Looks like a bug in lintian to me. Have you tried
On 08-Sep-2001 Christian T. Steigies wrote:
Hi,
I get a lot of those with lintian on m68k:
Operator or semicolon missing before supported at (eval 115) line 1.
Ambiguous use of resolved as operator at (eval 115) line 1.
Unquoted string supported may clash with future reserved word at
Hello,
I've taken over wvdial package with permission. The package had several
bugs fixed in former NMUs and I've uploaded a new version to fix another
one, but the bugs fixed in former NMUs are still marked as fixed in NMU
instead of being marked as plain fixed.
What should I have done to get
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 11:17:47PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
I've taken over wvdial package with permission. The package had several
bugs fixed in former NMUs and I've uploaded a new version to fix another
one, but the bugs fixed in former NMUs are still marked as fixed in NMU
instead of
* Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010909 00:22]:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 11:17:47PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
I've taken over wvdial package with permission. The package had several
bugs fixed in former NMUs and I've uploaded a new version to fix another
one, but the bugs fixed in former
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 12:27:11AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
I've taken over wvdial package with permission. The package had several
bugs fixed in former NMUs and I've uploaded a new version to fix another
one, but the bugs fixed in former NMUs are still marked as fixed in NMU
instead
* Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010909 01:35]:
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 12:27:11AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
I've taken over wvdial package with permission. The package had several
bugs fixed in former NMUs and I've uploaded a new version to fix another
one, but the bugs fixed in
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 01:36:31AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
I've taken over wvdial package with permission. The package had several
bugs fixed in former NMUs and I've uploaded a new version to fix another
one, but the bugs fixed in former NMUs are still marked as fixed in NMU
Unquoted string supported may clash with future reserved word at (eval 112)
line 1.
Operator or semicolon missing before supported at (eval 112) line 1.
Ambiguous use of resolved as operator at (eval 112) line 1.
Unquoted string supported may clash with future reserved word at (eval 115)
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 09:45:09PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Unquoted string supported may clash with future reserved word at (eval 112)
line 1.
Operator or semicolon missing before supported at (eval 112) line 1.
Ambiguous use of resolved as operator at (eval 112) line 1.
Hi,
i´ve packaged eroaster (a cdrecord frontend) and gkrellm-gnome (a plugin for
gkrellm that adds gnome support). I also plan to package 3 perl modules.
The packages can be found at www.blendi.org/debian/
I am searching for a debian developer who is willing to sponsor and advocate
me.
Martin
--
Hi,
I get a lot of those with lintian on m68k:
Operator or semicolon missing before supported at (eval 115) line 1.
Ambiguous use of resolved as operator at (eval 115) line 1.
Unquoted string supported may clash with future reserved word at (eval
112) line 1.
Is my package really that bad? Or
Hi Christian!
You wrote:
Operator or semicolon missing before supported at (eval 115) line 1.
Ambiguous use of resolved as operator at (eval 115) line 1.
Unquoted string supported may clash with future reserved word at (eval
112) line 1.
Looks like a bug in lintian to me. Have you tried
On 08-Sep-2001 Christian T. Steigies wrote:
Hi,
I get a lot of those with lintian on m68k:
Operator or semicolon missing before supported at (eval 115) line 1.
Ambiguous use of resolved as operator at (eval 115) line 1.
Unquoted string supported may clash with future reserved word at
Hello,
I've taken over wvdial package with permission. The package had several
bugs fixed in former NMUs and I've uploaded a new version to fix another
one, but the bugs fixed in former NMUs are still marked as fixed in NMU
instead of being marked as plain fixed.
What should I have done to get
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 11:17:47PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
I've taken over wvdial package with permission. The package had several
bugs fixed in former NMUs and I've uploaded a new version to fix another
one, but the bugs fixed in former NMUs are still marked as fixed in NMU
instead of being
* Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010909 00:22]:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 11:17:47PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
I've taken over wvdial package with permission. The package had several
bugs fixed in former NMUs and I've uploaded a new version to fix another
one, but the bugs fixed in former
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 12:27:11AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
I've taken over wvdial package with permission. The package had several
bugs fixed in former NMUs and I've uploaded a new version to fix another
one, but the bugs fixed in former NMUs are still marked as fixed in NMU
instead
* Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010909 01:35]:
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 12:27:11AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
I've taken over wvdial package with permission. The package had several
bugs fixed in former NMUs and I've uploaded a new version to fix another
one, but the bugs fixed in
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 01:36:31AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
I've taken over wvdial package with permission. The package had
several
bugs fixed in former NMUs and I've uploaded a new version to fix
another
one, but the bugs fixed in former NMUs are still marked as fixed
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 12:12:47PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
On 08-Sep-2001 Christian T. Steigies wrote:
Hi,
I get a lot of those with lintian on m68k:
Operator or semicolon missing before supported at (eval 115) line 1.
Ambiguous use of resolved as operator at (eval 115)
22 matches
Mail list logo