On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 03:16:11PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 06:27, Juan Rafael Alvarez Correa wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Months ago, I've switched from Slackware to Debian, and I find the
> > project so exciting that I'd like to help and contribute to its
> > success.
>
> Ex
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 03:16:11PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 06:27, Juan Rafael Alvarez Correa wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Months ago, I've switched from Slackware to Debian, and I find the
> > project so exciting that I'd like to help and contribute to its
> > success.
>
> E
> > You can also run lintian with the -i (or --info) flag to print these
> > automatically.
>
> Or if you are using debuild "debuild -L -i" to see lintian error against
> the source (ie: errors in debian/control)
Thanks, i was just about to check the debuild manpage for that option ;)
Greetings,
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 03:17:09PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > W: prips: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-like-dh_make
> > N:
> > N: There is "Upstream Author(s)" in your copyright file. This is not a
> > N: fixed field name, it's just a default dh_make value. You should adjust
> > N:
>
>> W: prips: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-like-dh_make
>> N:
>> N: There is "Upstream Author(s)" in your copyright file. This is not a
>> N: fixed field name, it's just a default dh_make value. You should adjust
>> N: it.
>> N:
>
> ... this "long description" is spectacularly uninform
"CW" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> You can also run lintian with the -i (or --info) flag to print these
> automatically.
Or if you are using debuild "debuild -L -i" to see lintian error against
the source (ie: errors in debian/control)
Christian
On 01-Oct-2001 Erich Schubert wrote:
>> W: prips: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-like-dh_make
>
> I've run into that warning with my packages, too.
> Is this really intended?
> Is it a bad-thing (tm) to fill out the dh_make template?
> i could not find this rule anymore in the lintian on the mi
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 02:10:18PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 06:41:35PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> > > W: prips: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-like-dh_make
> >
> > I've run into that warning with my packages, too.
> > Is this really intended?
> > Is it a bad-thing
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 06:41:35PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> > W: prips: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-like-dh_make
>
> I've run into that warning with my packages, too.
> Is this really intended?
> Is it a bad-thing (tm) to fill out the dh_make template?
> i could not find this rule anymo
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 02:54:34PM +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I'm not convinced we should have package maintainers who aren't even
> > intending to become full-fledged developers; I don't think that's what
> > the sponsorship process was designed to
Thus spoke Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-10-01 18:41:35:
> > W: prips: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-like-dh_make
>
> I've run into that warning with my packages, too.
> Is this really intended?
> Is it a bad-thing (tm) to fill out the dh_make template?
> i could not find this rule
David Caldwell wrote:
>I packaged up a small program I wrote a while ago for my
> first package:
>
> Package: eol
> Version: 1.0.2-1
> Section: text
> Priority: optional
> Architecture: i386
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.3-7)
> Installed-Size: 64
> Maintainer: David Caldwell
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:57:41PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 03:23:59PM +0200, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> > I've written a program called demish. I would like to see that package in
> > Debian, but since I am not a developer (and I don't want to be one, just for
> > maintain
Hello Admar,
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:57:41PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 03:23:59PM +0200, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> > > I've written a program called demish. I would like to see that package in
> > > Debian, but since I am n
> Perhaps I've expressed myself a little wrong. Consider me an upstream
> developer, rather than a package maintainer. (I've only created a
> package since it's a little easier to install than a .tgz. If my
> sponsor wants/needs to create a new package from source, that's ok
> with me.)
So actuall
> W: prips: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-like-dh_make
I've run into that warning with my packages, too.
Is this really intended?
Is it a bad-thing (tm) to fill out the dh_make template?
i could not find this rule anymore in the lintian on the mips box i
just checked, btw. So maybe this is alre
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 06:41:35PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> > W: prips: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-like-dh_make
>
> I've run into that warning with my packages, too.
> Is this really intended?
> Is it a bad-thing (tm) to fill out the dh_make template?
> i could not find this rule anymo
> > You can also run lintian with the -i (or --info) flag to print these
> > automatically.
>
> Or if you are using debuild "debuild -L -i" to see lintian error against
> the source (ie: errors in debian/control)
Thanks, i was just about to check the debuild manpage for that option ;)
Greetings
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 03:17:09PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > W: prips: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-like-dh_make
> > N:
> > N: There is "Upstream Author(s)" in your copyright file. This is not a
> > N: fixed field name, it's just a default dh_make value. You should adjust
> > N
>
>> W: prips: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-like-dh_make
>> N:
>> N: There is "Upstream Author(s)" in your copyright file. This is not a
>> N: fixed field name, it's just a default dh_make value. You should adjust
>> N: it.
>> N:
>
> ... this "long description" is spectacularly uninfor
"CW" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> You can also run lintian with the -i (or --info) flag to print these
> automatically.
Or if you are using debuild "debuild -L -i" to see lintian error against
the source (ie: errors in debian/control)
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 01-Oct-2001 Erich Schubert wrote:
>> W: prips: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-like-dh_make
>
> I've run into that warning with my packages, too.
> Is this really intended?
> Is it a bad-thing (tm) to fill out the dh_make template?
> i could not find this rule anymore in the lintian on the m
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 02:10:18PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 06:41:35PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> > > W: prips: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-like-dh_make
> >
> > I've run into that warning with my packages, too.
> > Is this really intended?
> > Is it a bad-thin
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 06:41:35PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> > W: prips: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-like-dh_make
>
> I've run into that warning with my packages, too.
> Is this really intended?
> Is it a bad-thing (tm) to fill out the dh_make template?
> i could not find this rule anym
Thus spoke Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-10-01 18:41:35:
> > W: prips: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-like-dh_make
>
> I've run into that warning with my packages, too.
> Is this really intended?
> Is it a bad-thing (tm) to fill out the dh_make template?
> i could not find this rul
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 06:27, Juan Rafael Alvarez Correa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Months ago, I've switched from Slackware to Debian, and I find the
> project so exciting that I'd like to help and contribute to its
> success.
Excellent!
> I make 3 packages:
I've just run lintian on them, the following i
Hello Admar,
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:57:41PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 03:23:59PM +0200, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> > > I've written a program called demish. I would like to see that package in
> > > Debian, but since I am
> Perhaps I've expressed myself a little wrong. Consider me an upstream
> developer, rather than a package maintainer. (I've only created a
> package since it's a little easier to install than a .tgz. If my
> sponsor wants/needs to create a new package from source, that's ok
> with me.)
So actual
> W: prips: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-like-dh_make
I've run into that warning with my packages, too.
Is this really intended?
Is it a bad-thing (tm) to fill out the dh_make template?
i could not find this rule anymore in the lintian on the mips box i
just checked, btw. So maybe this is alr
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:57:41PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 03:23:59PM +0200, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> > I've written a program called demish. I would like to see that package in
> > Debian, but since I am not a developer (and I don't want to be one, just for
> > maintai
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 03:23:59PM +0200, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> > I've written a program called demish. I would like to see that package in
> > Debian, but since I am not a developer (and I don't want to be one, just for
> > maintaining one package), I
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 06:27, Juan Rafael Alvarez Correa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Months ago, I've switched from Slackware to Debian, and I find the
> project so exciting that I'd like to help and contribute to its
> success.
Excellent!
> I make 3 packages:
I've just run lintian on them, the following
David Caldwell wrote:
>I packaged up a small program I wrote a while ago for my
> first package:
>
> Package: eol
> Version: 1.0.2-1
> Section: text
> Priority: optional
> Architecture: i386
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.3-7)
> Installed-Size: 64
> Maintainer: David Caldwell
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 03:23:59PM +0200, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> > I've written a program called demish. I would like to see that package in
> > Debian, but since I am not a developer (and I don't want to be one, just for
> > maintaining one package), I
34 matches
Mail list logo
