On Monday 08 October 2001 23:28, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:02:04PM +1000, Geoff O'Callaghan wrote:
Greetings all,
I've packaged a new tool (or suite of tools)... Here's the blurb...
Geoff,
I don't know anything about rockets but I was intrigued.
Your package
Hi,
Apparently, the building of my htdig package fails on the hppa
architecture (as is also noted by bug #105045):
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=htdigver=3.1.5-3arch=hppastamp=1002598209file=logas=raw
My question is pretty simple; how can I create a chroot environment on
sarti (the
On Monday 08 October 2001 23:28, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:02:04PM +1000, Geoff O'Callaghan wrote:
Greetings all,
I've packaged a new tool (or suite of tools)... Here's the blurb...
Geoff,
[snip]
Your debian/copyright file should say where you obtained the
Is the correct way to build a sponsored package with just
eg -mHamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] to dpkg-buildpackage
or debuild?
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
.changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
thanks
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL
Try -e...
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:29:39PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake
forth:
Is the correct way to build a sponsored package with just
eg -mHamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] to dpkg-buildpackage
or debuild?
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001 19:25, Stijn de Bekker wrote:
I've just taken over the htdig package and now I'm going through the
outstanding bugs. My question relates to bugs #74523 and #104607.
The htdig package uses an english wordlist which is now located in
/etc/htdig/ - just a list of english
On Sun, 7 Oct 2001 10:26:10 -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
- Why is there an empty /usr/lib/perl5 directory in your package?
Because the Makefile generated by MakeMaker makes that directory on
install. I now delete it after
Stijn de Bekker wrote:
Hi,
Apparently, the building of my htdig package fails on the hppa
architecture (as is also noted by bug #105045):
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=htdigver=3.1.5-3arch=hppastamp=100
2598209file=logas=raw
My question is pretty simple; how can I
Hi!
I have created a package of the LysKOM server (ITP bug #114231). Since this
is the first server I have packaged, I would appreciate if someone would
test and see that it works well on other systems than my own... :)
The package can be found at http://www.softwolves.pp.se/deb/
It only has
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:06:32AM -0500, Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake
forth:
eg -mHamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] to dpkg-buildpackage
or debuild?
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
.changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
I think that's
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 12:20:20PM -0700, Mike Markley wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:06:32AM -0500, Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake
forth:
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
.changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
I think that's correct. My
I think that's Maintainer: in the control file (and the .dsc). It makes
sense to me that the maintainer of a .dsc is the person primarily
responsible for the package, while the maintainer of a .changes is the
person responsible for uploading this particular build. This also
The Maintainer
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:40:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
However, I can see we aren't going to get anywhere with argument by
repeated assertion. :)
Do we need to take this to debian-devel, and find out what the
dpkg developers (Wichert, Adam etc) intended with the new field?
Hamish
--
Hi,
I'm working on packaging subversion, a compelling replacement for cvs.
The subversion server needs the Berkeley Database version 3.3.11, the
current version in unstable is 3.2.9. I've build 3.3.11-1 based on
patches in the BTS (#109853).
The differences betwene 3.2.x and 3.3.x require a
Hello, I've put together a couple of Debian packages, and would love to
contribute them to the Debian Project. I'm willing to maintain them.
However, I don't have an advocate or sponsor. Can anyone help me out?
For anyone who wants to peek, the packages are at:
Hello, I've put together a couple of Debian packages, and would love to
contribute them to the Debian Project. I'm willing to maintain them.
However, I don't have an advocate or sponsor. Can anyone help me out?
For anyone who wants to peek, the packages are at:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 08:40:46AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:40:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
However, I can see we aren't going to get anywhere with argument by
repeated assertion. :)
Do we need to take this to debian-devel, and find out what the
dpkg
Colin == Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Colin I think that would be appropriate.
Colin Exactly what are the intended semantics of Maintainer: and
Colin Changed-By: in the .changes file (not the .dsc)? In
Colin particular, when sponsoring a package, which field in the
On Monday 08 October 2001 23:28, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:02:04PM +1000, Geoff O'Callaghan wrote:
Greetings all,
I've packaged a new tool (or suite of tools)... Here's the blurb...
Geoff,
I don't know anything about rockets but I was intrigued.
Your package
Hi,
Apparently, the building of my htdig package fails on the hppa
architecture (as is also noted by bug #105045):
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=htdigver=3.1.5-3arch=hppastamp=1002598209file=logas=raw
My question is pretty simple; how can I create a chroot environment on
sarti (the
On Monday 08 October 2001 23:28, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:02:04PM +1000, Geoff O'Callaghan wrote:
Greetings all,
I've packaged a new tool (or suite of tools)... Here's the blurb...
Geoff,
[snip]
Your debian/copyright file should say where you obtained the
Is the correct way to build a sponsored package with just
eg -mHamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] to dpkg-buildpackage
or debuild?
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
.changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
thanks
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try -e...
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:29:39PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spake forth:
Is the correct way to build a sponsored package with just
eg -mHamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] to dpkg-buildpackage
or debuild?
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001 19:25, Stijn de Bekker wrote:
I've just taken over the htdig package and now I'm going through the
outstanding bugs. My question relates to bugs #74523 and #104607.
The htdig package uses an english wordlist which is now located in
/etc/htdig/ - just a list of english
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:29:39PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Is the correct way to build a sponsored package with just
eg -mHamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] to dpkg-buildpackage
or debuild?
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
.changes file as a result. That seems
On Sun, 7 Oct 2001 10:26:10 -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
- Why is there an empty /usr/lib/perl5 directory in your package?
Because the Makefile generated by MakeMaker makes that directory on
install. I now delete it after
Stijn de Bekker wrote:
Hi,
Apparently, the building of my htdig package fails on the hppa
architecture (as is also noted by bug #105045):
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=htdigver=3.1.5-3arch=hppastamp=100
2598209file=logas=raw
My question is pretty simple; how can I create
Hi!
I have created a package of the LysKOM server (ITP bug #114231). Since this
is the first server I have packaged, I would appreciate if someone would
test and see that it works well on other systems than my own... :)
The package can be found at http://www.softwolves.pp.se/deb/
It only has
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:06:32AM -0500, Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spake forth:
eg -mHamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] to dpkg-buildpackage
or debuild?
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
.changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
I think that's
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 12:20:20PM -0700, Mike Markley wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:06:32AM -0500, Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spake forth:
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
.changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
I think that's correct. My
I think that's Maintainer: in the control file (and the .dsc). It makes
sense to me that the maintainer of a .dsc is the person primarily
responsible for the package, while the maintainer of a .changes is the
person responsible for uploading this particular build. This also
The Maintainer
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:40:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
However, I can see we aren't going to get anywhere with argument by
repeated assertion. :)
Do we need to take this to debian-devel, and find out what the
dpkg developers (Wichert, Adam etc) intended with the new field?
Hamish
--
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 08:40:46AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:40:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
However, I can see we aren't going to get anywhere with argument by
repeated assertion. :)
Do we need to take this to debian-devel, and find out what the
dpkg
Colin == Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Colin I think that would be appropriate.
Colin Exactly what are the intended semantics of Maintainer: and
Colin Changed-By: in the .changes file (not the .dsc)? In
Colin particular, when sponsoring a package, which field in the
Hi,
I'm working on packaging subversion, a compelling replacement for cvs.
The subversion server needs the Berkeley Database version 3.3.11, the
current version in unstable is 3.2.9. I've build 3.3.11-1 based on
patches in the BTS (#109853).
The differences betwene 3.2.x and 3.3.x require a
Hello, I've put together a couple of Debian packages, and would love to
contribute them to the Debian Project. I'm willing to maintain them.
However, I don't have an advocate or sponsor. Can anyone help me out?
For anyone who wants to peek, the packages are at:
36 matches
Mail list logo