HELP: [Bug#122501: latex2html: should depend on gs for pstoimg]

2001-12-05 Thread Chanop Silpa-Anan
It is in the Recommends list. If one doesn't have any character that latex2html wants to convert to an image, it would work properly, hence only Recommends (I beleive this is the reason from previous maintainer). What do you think? regards, Chanop For once, I heard Ryan Murray said > Package:

Re: a suitable program name?

2001-12-05 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 05-Dec-2001 Hereward Cooper wrote: > Hi there yal, > > Is 'fileconvert-v1-to-v2' a suitable program name within a package (this is > not > the package itself, just a program is supplies). Should it be shorter + more > relevant to the package in comes with? > a leading app- would probably mak

get in the action

2001-12-05 Thread get some
Title: Untitled Document

Re: why did the ocaml package not enter woody ?

2001-12-05 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I maintain the ocaml package, and am wondering if there is any way to check > why the ocaml package has not entered woody/testing. Hmm, http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_output.txt> is no longer in service, it seems. So I'm reduced to guessing: there

Re: a suitable program name?

2001-12-05 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 05-Dec-2001 Hereward Cooper wrote: > Hi there yal, > > Is 'fileconvert-v1-to-v2' a suitable program name within a package (this is > not > the package itself, just a program is supplies). Should it be shorter + more > relevant to the package in comes with? > a leading app- would probably ma

get in the action

2001-12-05 Thread get some
Title: Untitled Document

a suitable program name?

2001-12-05 Thread Hereward Cooper
Hi there yal, Is 'fileconvert-v1-to-v2' a suitable program name within a package (this is not the package itself, just a program is supplies). Should it be shorter + more relevant to the package in comes with? Thanks, Hereward

Re: why did the ocaml package not enter woody ?

2001-12-05 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I maintain the ocaml package, and am wondering if there is any way to check > why the ocaml package has not entered woody/testing. Hmm, http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_output.txt> is no longer in service, it seems. So I'm reduced to guessing: there

a suitable program name?

2001-12-05 Thread Hereward Cooper
Hi there yal, Is 'fileconvert-v1-to-v2' a suitable program name within a package (this is not the package itself, just a program is supplies). Should it be shorter + more relevant to the package in comes with? Thanks, Hereward -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

[광고] 이만한 창업지원 및 영업지원은 없겠죠?? 02-404-6288 담당:최광웅팀장

2001-12-05 Thread 최광웅
Title: (주)코소넷 만물상 홍보메일입니다.     창업을 준비하시거나 업체를 경영하시는 분들을 위한 메일홍보입니다. 이 메일은 홈페이지구축(만물상+홈페이지구축+1년웹호스팅)에관한 홍보내용과 리셀러 및 협력업체를 모집하는 내용으로 구성되어 있습니다.   당사는 인터넷쇼핑몰 자동구축솔루션인 만물상을 홍보하면서 중소기업 및 소

Re: dpkg-reconfigure, policy, and least surprise principle

2001-12-05 Thread Joey Hess
Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > This _will_ overwrite the local values, unless Debconf has a writable, > local DB as well. I really don't see how to implement this without a > writable DB. Is having a writable DB somewhere a requirement of > Debconf or is my code broken? If it's broken, what is the fix

[광고] 이만한 창업지원 및 영업지원은 없겠죠?? 02-404-6288 담당:최광웅팀장

2001-12-05 Thread 최광웅
Title: (ÁÖ)ÄÚ¼Ò³Ý ¸¸¹°»ó È«º¸¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.     Ã¢¾÷À» ÁغñÇϽðųª ¾÷ü¸¦ °æ¿µÇϽô ºÐµéÀ» À§ÇÑ ¸ÞÀÏÈ«º¸ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀº ȨÆäÀÌÁö±¸Ãà(¸¸¹°»ó+ȨÆäÀÌÁö±¸Ãà+1³âÀ¥È£½ºÆÃ)¿¡°üÇÑ È«º¸³»¿ë°ú ¸®¼¿·¯ ¹

Re: dpkg-reconfigure, policy, and least surprise principle

2001-12-05 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Mark Brown | On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 12:36:26PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | > * Roland Mas | | > | A hypothetical third hand would be holding this: the postinst first | > | reads the master config file and shoves its values into Debconf, then | | > This is the right way, though. Note

Re: dpkg-reconfigure, policy, and least surprise principle

2001-12-05 Thread Joey Hess
Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > This _will_ overwrite the local values, unless Debconf has a writable, > local DB as well. I really don't see how to implement this without a > writable DB. Is having a writable DB somewhere a requirement of > Debconf or is my code broken? If it's broken, what is the fi

Re: dpkg-reconfigure, policy, and least surprise principle

2001-12-05 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Mark Brown | On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 12:36:26PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | > * Roland Mas | | > | A hypothetical third hand would be holding this: the postinst first | > | reads the master config file and shoves its values into Debconf, then | | > This is the right way, though. Note