Re: provides and dependencies

2001-12-26 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 06:52:15PM +0100, Sven wrote: > Replaces: camlp4, ocaml-base > Provides: camlp4 (= 3.04-3), ocaml-base (= 3.04-3) I don't think you can provide particular versions. Unless this has changed in dpkg recently. (It's one of the most wanted features.) > > > I solved this with u

Packaging something with a PostgreSQL database.

2001-12-26 Thread Gaetano Paolone
Hi, I am going to package odontolinux. This is a management software for dental offices. I am also the author of the software itself. Odontolinux is written in PHP4 and uses PostgreSQL as dbms. It is a non-US package because of PostgreSQL. I looked for similar packages in debian sources... but I f

[no subject]

2001-12-26 Thread Happy Hanukka
Title: NOVEMBER DECEMBER'S CLOSEOUT: JUDAICA ART - JUST IN TIME FOR THE HOLIDAYS For a Limited Time Only!!! David Yochanan - Colors   David Yochanan - Micro Calligraphy     "Beloved Jerusalem"

Re: provides and dependencies

2001-12-26 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 06:52:15PM +0100, Sven wrote: > Replaces: camlp4, ocaml-base > Provides: camlp4 (= 3.04-3), ocaml-base (= 3.04-3) I don't think you can provide particular versions. Unless this has changed in dpkg recently. (It's one of the most wanted features.) > > > I solved this with

Packaging something with a PostgreSQL database.

2001-12-26 Thread Gaetano Paolone
Hi, I am going to package odontolinux. This is a management software for dental offices. I am also the author of the software itself. Odontolinux is written in PHP4 and uses PostgreSQL as dbms. It is a non-US package because of PostgreSQL. I looked for similar packages in debian sources... but I

Re: Bug #120407 : nparted

2001-12-26 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Speed Blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hello, > I have made a package for a requested package : nparted (bug #12047) > I am not advocate so I don't know exactly what to do. > Do I send a mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the url of package ? > This is certainly ok, but are you going

[no subject]

2001-12-26 Thread Happy Hanukka
Title: NOVEMBER DECEMBER'S CLOSEOUT: JUDAICA ART - JUST IN TIME FOR THE HOLIDAYS For a Limited Time Only!!! David Yochanan - Colors   David Yochanan - Micro Calligraphy     "Beloved Jerusalem"

Re: provides and dependencies

2001-12-26 Thread Sven
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 02:00:37PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hello, ... > > Hi, > > > I have a package C, which i wanted to make depend on B only, but which > > should > > also work when A is installed, since A provides B. > > > > But this does not wo

Re: Bug#126434: ITP: super-sed -- An enhanced version of sed

2001-12-26 Thread Joey Hess
Ganesan R wrote: > This may be an obvious question. It's not enough to rename the source > tarball, I'll have to rename the sed-3.52 directory within the tarball and > create a new tarball. Is this still okay? You don't really need to do that, there is currently no requirement about the name of th

Re: provides and dependencies

2001-12-26 Thread Sven
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 02:00:37PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hello, ... > > Hi, > > > I have a package C, which i wanted to make depend on B only, but which should > > also work when A is installed, since A provides B. > > > > But this does not work,

Bug #120407 : nparted

2001-12-26 Thread Speed Blue
hello, I have made a package for a requested package : nparted (bug #12047) I am not advocate so I don't know exactly what to do. Do I send a mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the url of package ? The package is available at : http://www.speedblue.org/debian/nparted/

Re: Bug#126434: ITP: super-sed -- An enhanced version of sed

2001-12-26 Thread Joey Hess
Ganesan R wrote: > This may be an obvious question. It's not enough to rename the source > tarball, I'll have to rename the sed-3.52 directory within the tarball and > create a new tarball. Is this still okay? You don't really need to do that, there is currently no requirement about the name of t

Bug #120407 : nparted

2001-12-26 Thread Speed Blue
hello, I have made a package for a requested package : nparted (bug #12047) I am not advocate so I don't know exactly what to do. Do I send a mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the url of package ? The package is available at : http://www.speedblue.org/debian/nparted/

Re: Bug#126434: ITP: super-sed -- An enhanced version of sed

2001-12-26 Thread Ganesan R
> "Ganesan" == Ganesan R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can understand the concern. Okay, for now ssed will simply be another > extra package. Since alternatives is out, the info files are still a problem > though. Unlike /usr/sbin/sed the info files are split into multiple files > with cross

Re: Bug#126434: ITP: super-sed -- An enhanced version of sed

2001-12-26 Thread Ganesan R
> "Ganesan" == Ganesan R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can understand the concern. Okay, for now ssed will simply be another > extra package. Since alternatives is out, the info files are still a problem > though. Unlike /usr/sbin/sed the info files are split into multiple files > with cros

Re: Bug#126434: ITP: super-sed -- An enhanced version of sed

2001-12-26 Thread Ganesan R
> "Henrique" == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Adam Heath wrote: >> What you want is dpkg-divert. But I vote against diverting /usr/bin/sed. > I have to agree with Adam, diverting sed might be dangerous. > HOWEVER, nothing forbids you to packa

Re: Bug#126434: ITP: super-sed -- An enhanced version of sed

2001-12-26 Thread Ganesan R
> "Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 26 Dec 2001, Ganesan R wrote: >> 1. The source tarball is still called sed (the latest version is >> sed-3.52.tar.gz). What are my options of dealing with this other than >> asking upstream to change the source tarball? > You can rename

Re: Bug#126434: ITP: super-sed -- An enhanced version of sed

2001-12-26 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Adam Heath wrote: > What you want is dpkg-divert. But I vote against diverting /usr/bin/sed. I have to agree with Adam, diverting sed might be dangerous. HOWEVER, nothing forbids you to package it simply as ssed for now, then run very comprehensive regression tests to make s

Re: Bug#126434: ITP: super-sed -- An enhanced version of sed

2001-12-26 Thread Adam Heath
On 26 Dec 2001, Ganesan R wrote: > 1. The source tarball is still called sed (the latest version is >sed-3.52.tar.gz). What are my options of dealing with this other than >asking upstream to change the source tarball? You can rename the source tarball when uploading to debian. No problem

[±¤°í] ½ºÆÔ¸ÞÀÏÀÌ ¾Æ´Õ´Ï´Ù!! ±¤°í¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù!!

2001-12-26 Thread ÁÖ
Title: ¾È³çÇϽʴϱî? ¾È³çÇϽʴϱî?  www.life123.net ¿î¿µÀÚÀÔ´Ï´Ù.  Çã¶ô ¾øÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» µå·Á¼­ ´ë´ÜÈ÷ Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Á¤ÁßÈ÷ ¾çÇظ¦ ºÎŹµå¸®°Ú½À´Ï´Ù. ¿øÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â ¸ÞÀÏÀ̽öó¸é ¾Æ·¡ÀÇ "¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ" ¹öÆ°À» ´­·¯ ÁÖ½Ã¸é ´Ù½Ã´Â ¸ÞÀÏÀÌ °¡Á

Re: Bug#126434: ITP: super-sed -- An enhanced version of sed

2001-12-26 Thread Ganesan R
> "Henrique" == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Adam Heath wrote: >> What you want is dpkg-divert. But I vote against diverting /usr/bin/sed. > I have to agree with Adam, diverting sed might be dangerous. > HOWEVER, nothing forbids you to pack

Re: Bug#126434: ITP: super-sed -- An enhanced version of sed

2001-12-26 Thread Ganesan R
> "Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 26 Dec 2001, Ganesan R wrote: >> 1. The source tarball is still called sed (the latest version is >> sed-3.52.tar.gz). What are my options of dealing with this other than >> asking upstream to change the source tarball? > You can rename