Colin Watson wrote:
> It seems to me that this requirement is a relic of the times before
> OpenMotif was packaged. At that point it was sensible to require
> statically linked versions of Motif applications so that Debian users
> could use them without having to get hold of a version of Motif
> th
Colin Watson wrote:
> It seems to me that this requirement is a relic of the times before
> OpenMotif was packaged. At that point it was sensible to require
> statically linked versions of Motif applications so that Debian users
> could use them without having to get hold of a version of Motif
> t
Hi,
At Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:57:04 +0200,
Andres Soolo wrote:
> > 2 isn't quite right. There is at least one English word that have ë
> > in it (an umlat-e?). But because i'm not native English, I don't
> > remember what that word is. ;-)
> There are 'na?ve' and '?sthetical'.
> In recent decades
Hi,
At Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:57:04 +0200,
Andres Soolo wrote:
> > 2 isn't quite right. There is at least one English word that have ë
> > in it (an umlat-e?). But because i'm not native English, I don't
> > remember what that word is. ;-)
> There are 'na?ve' and '?sthetical'.
> In recent decade
Bastian Kleineidam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
> to have your package.
But a package statically linked to OpenMotif must still not go into
main. Not installing libmotif to keep your system free but installing
it when bundled
On Fri, 2002-Jan-11, Anders Jackson wrote:
> > (2) use English, this is should, but I imagine that English
> > is the only language which can fully expressed using ASCII
> > character set.
> 2 isn't quite right. There is at least one English word that have ë
> in it (an umlat-e?). But because i'm
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:46:56PM +0100, Anders Jackson wrote:
> Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hi,
> Hi.
> [...]
> > In short, (1) use ASCII character set, this is mandatory,
> > (2) use English, this is should, but I imagine that English
> > is the only language which can fu
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:46:56PM +0100, Anders Jackson wrote:
> 2 isn't quite right. There is at least one English word that have ë
> in it (an umlat-e?). But because i'm not native English, I don't
> remember what that word is. ;-)
Generally spoken, most heavy-metal-bands have Umlauts in the
Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
Hi.
[...]
>
> In short, (1) use ASCII character set, this is mandatory,
> (2) use English, this is should, but I imagine that English
> is the only language which can fully expressed using ASCII
> character set.
2 isn't quite right. There is
Bastian Kleineidam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
> to have your package.
But a package statically linked to OpenMotif must still not go into
main. Not installing libmotif to keep your system free but installing
it when bundled
On Fri, 2002-Jan-11, Anders Jackson wrote:
> > (2) use English, this is should, but I imagine that English
> > is the only language which can fully expressed using ASCII
> > character set.
> 2 isn't quite right. There is at least one English word that have ë
> in it (an umlat-e?). But because i'
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:46:56PM +0100, Anders Jackson wrote:
> Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hi,
> Hi.
> [...]
> > In short, (1) use ASCII character set, this is mandatory,
> > (2) use English, this is should, but I imagine that English
> > is the only language which can f
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 02:24:23PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> > Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
> > to have your package.
> Ok. So my package should contain 2 binary packages, one linked
> statically and one dynamically, but
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:46:56PM +0100, Anders Jackson wrote:
> 2 isn't quite right. There is at least one English word that have ë
> in it (an umlat-e?). But because i'm not native English, I don't
> remember what that word is. ;-)
Generally spoken, most heavy-metal-bands have Umlauts in th
Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
Hi.
[...]
>
> In short, (1) use ASCII character set, this is mandatory,
> (2) use English, this is should, but I imagine that English
> is the only language which can fully expressed using ASCII
> character set.
2 isn't quite right. There is
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:10:55PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> My problem is: snd doesn't work well with lesstif according to the
> upstream maintainer, the gtk-gui isn't as mature as the motif-gui, so I
> have to use open motif (libmotif). The policy states that such a package
> must go to c
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 02:24:23PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> > Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
> > to have your package.
> Ok. So my package should contain 2 binary packages, one linked
> statically and one dynamically, bu
Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
> to have your package.
Ok. So my package should contain 2 binary packages, one linked
statically and one dynamically, but both to libmotif. I don't have to
make a version with lesstif, do I?
> Non-
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:10:55PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> But I don't understand why I also have to make both a statically and a
> dynamically linked version of the package, as reqested by 12.8.
Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
to have your pack
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:10:55PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> My problem is: snd doesn't work well with lesstif according to the
> upstream maintainer, the gtk-gui isn't as mature as the motif-gui, so I
> have to use open motif (libmotif). The policy states that such a package
> must go to
Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
> to have your package.
Ok. So my package should contain 2 binary packages, one linked
statically and one dynamically, but both to libmotif. I don't have to
make a version with lesstif, do I?
> Non
Hello,
I'd like to make a new package for snd. The current maintainer told me
that he would sponsor me.
My problem is: snd doesn't work well with lesstif according to the
upstream maintainer, the gtk-gui isn't as mature as the motif-gui, so I
have to use open motif (libmotif). The policy states
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:10:55PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> But I don't understand why I also have to make both a statically and a
> dynamically linked version of the package, as reqested by 12.8.
Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
to have your pac
Hello,
I'd like to make a new package for snd. The current maintainer told me
that he would sponsor me.
My problem is: snd doesn't work well with lesstif according to the
upstream maintainer, the gtk-gui isn't as mature as the motif-gui, so I
have to use open motif (libmotif). The policy state
24 matches
Mail list logo
