Junichi Uekawa:
> Without too much looking at, my first question is: why do you have
> mowitz-config in diff.gz?
It seems that it is not removed properly when doing a make distclean.
I'll fix that.
> Binary package names are incorrect, name them "lib"mowitz0 and
> "lib"mowitz-dev
Okay. I was a
Junichi Uekawa:
> Without too much looking at, my first question is: why do you have
> mowitz-config in diff.gz?
It seems that it is not removed properly when doing a make distclean.
I'll fix that.
> Binary package names are incorrect, name them "lib"mowitz0 and
> "lib"mowitz-dev
Okay. I was a
peter karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> Could someone please have a look at the files that I put up at
> http://www.softwolves.pp.se/tmp/mowitz/ and see if I have done it right
> or not?
Without too much looking at, my first question is:
why do you have mowitz-config in diff.g
Bob Hilliard wrote:
> However, after this action, /var/cache/debconf/config.dat still
> contains:
>
> Name: dict-web1913/reconf
> Template: dict-web1913/reconf
> Value:
> Owners: unknown
echo purge | debconf-communicate
You at one point ran the config script or postinst by hand, debconf
c
Hi!
When upgrading Siag Office to its latest version I found that parts of
the code had been broken out into a library. Since I have never before
packaged a library I would appreciate some help to check whether I am
doing things correctly or not.
Could someone please have a look at the files that
peter karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> Could someone please have a look at the files that I put up at
> http://www.softwolves.pp.se/tmp/mowitz/ and see if I have done it right
> or not?
Without too much looking at, my first question is:
why do you have mowitz-config in diff.
I have been having continuing difficulties making debconf display
a note for dict-web1913. With DEBCONF=developer in my environment,
when I install the package, debconf returns:
debconf (developer): frontend started
debconf (developer): frontend running, package name is dict-web1913
Bob Hilliard wrote:
> However, after this action, /var/cache/debconf/config.dat still
> contains:
>
> Name: dict-web1913/reconf
> Template: dict-web1913/reconf
> Value:
> Owners: unknown
echo purge | debconf-communicate
You at one point ran the config script or postinst by hand, debconf
Hi!
When upgrading Siag Office to its latest version I found that parts of
the code had been broken out into a library. Since I have never before
packaged a library I would appreciate some help to check whether I am
doing things correctly or not.
Could someone please have a look at the files tha
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 11:24:46AM -0500, Bill Jonas wrote:
> Hello. I'm preparing to start the NM process (reading documentation,
> etc), and I have found an orphaned package to adopt that seems as though
> it would be suitable for me. Since I'm not yet a developer, is it all
> right to ITA the
I have been having continuing difficulties making debconf display
a note for dict-web1913. With DEBCONF=developer in my environment,
when I install the package, debconf returns:
debconf (developer): frontend started
debconf (developer): frontend running, package name is dict-web1913
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 02:50:41PM +1300, Corrin Lakeland wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've got a package (gtkgo) that has been discontinued upstream. So far I've
> been ignoring this and continuing to apply fixes, etc. But I'm beginning to
> wonder
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 11:24:46AM -0500, Bill Jonas wrote:
> Hello. I'm preparing to start the NM process (reading documentation,
> etc), and I have found an orphaned package to adopt that seems as though
> it would be suitable for me. Since I'm not yet a developer, is it all
> right to ITA the
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
> See bug #133795, is there any policy regarding how the word lists are
> supposed to be sorted? If I do what the submitter wants, look will
> break with LANG != n[nbo]_NO, so I am somewhat reluctant to do it.
>
I reported a similar bug for look with french (see #109364
Hello. I'm preparing to start the NM process (reading documentation,
etc), and I have found an orphaned package to adopt that seems as though
it would be suitable for me. Since I'm not yet a developer, is it all
right to ITA the package? (It's a very small, non-essential package.)
If not, what s
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 02:50:41PM +1300, Corrin Lakeland wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've got a package (gtkgo) that has been discontinued upstream. So far I've
> been ignoring this and continuing to apply fixes, etc. But I'm beginning to
> wonder
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
> See bug #133795, is there any policy regarding how the word lists are
> supposed to be sorted? If I do what the submitter wants, look will
> break with LANG != n[nbo]_NO, so I am somewhat reluctant to do it.
>
I reported a similar bug for look with french (see #10936
Hello. I'm preparing to start the NM process (reading documentation,
etc), and I have found an orphaned package to adopt that seems as though
it would be suitable for me. Since I'm not yet a developer, is it all
right to ITA the package? (It's a very small, non-essential package.)
If not, what
18 matches
Mail list logo
