Ian Duggan wrote:
>
> When specifying the regexp to be used in a watch file, are backslashes
> supposed to be escaped? The New Maintainer's Guide says one thing, but
> the man page for uscan says another. Which is preferred/correct?
Install the uscan from unstable, and do not escape backslashes.
When packaging kernel patches, should the patches be against the debian
kernel sources or the stock kernels? I have several patches I'm
packaging for the stock kernels. It would be a lot of work to pull down
all the various debian kernels and modify the patches for them.
How should this be handle
My uscan man page only uses one backslash..
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 03:01:32PM -0800, Ian Duggan wrote:
>
> When specifying the regexp to be used in a watch file, are backslashes
> supposed to be escaped? The New Maintainer's Guide says one thing, but
> the man page for uscan says another. Which
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 08:24:49PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Yes. You should also try to find a sponsor. This mailing list is
> a good place for this. If you say which package it is you're
> interesting in, someone might want to sponsor you.
It's dtmfdial. I took a look through the wnpp
I'm packaging some kernel patches that apply against some of the -ac
kernel trees, however it looks like dh_installkpatches isn't designed to
handle this. Here is the relevant line:
$kv[0] =~ m/^(\d+\.\d+)\.(\d+)$/ or die "Malformed kernel version:
`$kv[0]'";
and the error:
dh_installkpatches
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 08:43:56PM +0100, "Francesco P. Lovergine" wrote:
> Send a reply to the orphaning message on bugs.debian.org
> and explain what you are going to do.
Thanks.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:39:14PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Could you find someone who is willing to sponsor y
When specifying the regexp to be used in a watch file, are backslashes
supposed to be escaped? The New Maintainer's Guide says one thing, but
the man page for uscan says another. Which is preferred/correct?
Where do I ask to get the incorrect version updated?
man uscan:
--
# Site
When packaging kernel patches, should the patches be against the debian
kernel sources or the stock kernels? I have several patches I'm
packaging for the stock kernels. It would be a lot of work to pull down
all the various debian kernels and modify the patches for them.
How should this be handl
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 08:24:49PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Yes. You should also try to find a sponsor. This mailing list is
> a good place for this. If you say which package it is you're
> interesting in, someone might want to sponsor you.
It's dtmfdial. I took a look through the wnp
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 08:43:56PM +0100, "Francesco P. Lovergine" wrote:
> Send a reply to the orphaning message on bugs.debian.org
> and explain what you are going to do.
Thanks.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:39:14PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Could you find someone who is willing to sponsor
Elite hacker type seeks Debian sponsor in the (South-West) Denver,
Colorado area.
Seriously though, I have been considering applying for quite some time,
but have not been able to find the time. I have been using Debian for a
couple of years now (GNU/Linux since the 0.99 days). I have rolled all
When specifying the regexp to be used in a watch file, are backslashes
supposed to be escaped? The New Maintainer's Guide says one thing, but
the man page for uscan says another. Which is preferred/correct?
Where do I ask to get the incorrect version updated?
man uscan:
--
# Site
Elite hacker type seeks Debian sponsor in the (South-West) Denver,
Colorado area.
Seriously though, I have been considering applying for quite some time,
but have not been able to find the time. I have been using Debian for a
couple of years now (GNU/Linux since the 0.99 days). I have rolled al
* Bill Jonas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020312 11:24]:
> Hello. I'm preparing to start the NM process (reading documentation,
> etc), and I have found an orphaned package to adopt that seems as though
> it would be suitable for me. Since I'm not yet a developer, is it all
> right to ITA the package?
* Bill Jonas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020312 11:24]:
> Hello. I'm preparing to start the NM process (reading documentation,
> etc), and I have found an orphaned package to adopt that seems as though
> it would be suitable for me. Since I'm not yet a developer, is it all
> right to ITA the package?
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 11:24:46AM -0500, Bill Jonas wrote:
> Hello. I'm preparing to start the NM process (reading documentation,
> etc), and I have found an orphaned package to adopt that seems as though
> it would be suitable for me. Since I'm not yet a developer, is it all
> right to ITA the
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 11:24:46AM -0500, Bill Jonas wrote:
> Hello. I'm preparing to start the NM process (reading documentation,
> etc), and I have found an orphaned package to adopt that seems as though
> it would be suitable for me. Since I'm not yet a developer, is it all
> right to ITA the
17 matches
Mail list logo
