> I know how to make single packages (at least they seem to work), but have
> no idea where to start for a multipackage thing. What documentation could
> I read in order to understand the procedure, or what simple existing
> package could I have a look at?
>
dh_make can generate rules for multi-
Hi all,
This is my first post here, so I may be in the entirely wrong forum.
Anyway, I'm packaging a largish game we're making. It's a Python game
written using Pygame, and contains ~20MB of static data, such as graphics,
scenarios and audio. We'd like to package the thing into two or more
pack
The reason I wrote the program was to have a convenient way of reminding
me of simple things...Like when the laundry is going to be finished,
water is boiling, etc. I'm a very forgetful person :)
at alone isn't sufficient, as Matt mentioned.
You can find the script up at:
http://atlee.ca/alarm_
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 01:56:43AM +0100, Manfred Wassmann wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 06:22:49AM +0100, Manfred Wassmann wrote:
> >
> > > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Rather than a second workalike program which relies
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 06:22:49AM +0100, Manfred Wassmann wrote:
>
> > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Rather than a second workalike program which relies on GNOME, I'd be
> > > interested in something with this functionality that did
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 01:56:43AM +0100, Manfred Wassmann wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 06:22:49AM +0100, Manfred Wassmann wrote:
> >
> > > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Rather than a second workalike program which relies
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 06:22:49AM +0100, Manfred Wassmann wrote:
>
> > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Rather than a second workalike program which relies on GNOME, I'd be
> > > interested in something with this functionality that di
Hi,
I received this (1) bug report today. It is really easy to fix : I should
only comment one ligne of code :
kdDebug (7199) << "Command : " << command << endl;
However this line is for debuging. So I ask me if it is neccessary to
consider this as a bug, and to fix it. I agree that it should be
Re
> I don't think this is worth an extra package. The only useful
> extension to pptp-linux is the bootscript, you could try to contact
> the pptp-linux maintainer to include that. The documentation itself
Okay, I'll try...
> is a collection of examples and summary of documentation already
> av
Antwort an Simon Richter:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Martin Eitzenberger wrote:
> > > > I made a package for the People in Austria wich are using PPtP ADSL,
> > > > with the required Bootscript and a large documentation...
> > >
> > > There is already a pppoe package in Debian, perhaps it would be a
Hi,
I received this (1) bug report today. It is really easy to fix : I should
only comment one ligne of code :
kdDebug (7199) << "Command : " << command << endl;
However this line is for debuging. So I ask me if it is neccessary to
consider this as a bug, and to fix it. I agree that it should b
Re
> I don't think this is worth an extra package. The only useful
> extension to pptp-linux is the bootscript, you could try to contact
> the pptp-linux maintainer to include that. The documentation itself
Okay, I'll try...
> is a collection of examples and summary of documentation already
> a
Antwort an Simon Richter:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Martin Eitzenberger wrote:
> > > > I made a package for the People in Austria wich are using PPtP ADSL,
> > > > with the required Bootscript and a large documentation...
> > >
> > > There is already a pppoe package in Debian, perhaps it would be a
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > On most architectures, it doesn't really matter except for heavy
> > mathematics and 3D. The only exception is i386, where the performance
> > decrease is actually measurable.
> Do you really mean "i386", or do you mean "ix86"?
> Is there a perform
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Martin Eitzenberger wrote:
> > > I made a package for the People in Austria wich are using PPtP ADSL,
> > > with the required Bootscript and a large documentation...
> > There is already a pppoe package in Debian, perhaps it would be a good
> > idea to merge in your package w
Martin Eitzenberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I made a package for the People in Austria wich are using PPtP ADSL,
> with the required Bootscript and a large documentation...
I don't think this is worth an extra package. The only useful
extension to pptp-linux is the bootscript, you could tr
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:27:45PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Will Newton wrote:
>
> [PIC or not PIC]
>
> > I understand the need for PIC, but I was asking whether or not compiling
> > whole binaries with PIC unnecesarily might be a bad thing. e.g. if I cannot
> > control
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 06:22:49AM +0100, Manfred Wassmann wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Rather than a second workalike program which relies on GNOME, I'd be
> > interested in something with this functionality that did not use GNOME
> > at all (or optionally).
>
> man at
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Martin Eitzenberger wrote:
> > > I made a package for the People in Austria wich are using PPtP ADSL,
> > > with the required Bootscript and a large documentation...
> > There is already a pppoe package in Debian, perhaps it would be a good
> > idea to merge in your package
Hi!
Antwort an Simon Richter:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Martin Eitzenberger wrote:
> > I made a package for the People in Austria wich are using PPtP ADSL,
> > with the required Bootscript and a large documentation...
>
> There is already a pppoe package in Debian, perhaps it would be a good
> idea t
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Martin Eitzenberger wrote:
> I made a package for the People in Austria wich are using PPtP ADSL,
> with the required Bootscript and a large documentation...
There is already a pppoe package in Debian, perhaps it would be a good
idea to merge in your package with that?
Si
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Will Newton wrote:
[PIC or not PIC]
> I understand the need for PIC, but I was asking whether or not compiling
> whole binaries with PIC unnecesarily might be a bad thing. e.g. if I cannot
> control the granularity of compiler options easily in a build system and I
> build an
Martin Eitzenberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I made a package for the People in Austria wich are using PPtP ADSL,
> with the required Bootscript and a large documentation...
I don't think this is worth an extra package. The only useful
extension to pptp-linux is the bootscript, you could t
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:27:45PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Will Newton wrote:
>
> [PIC or not PIC]
>
> > I understand the need for PIC, but I was asking whether or not compiling
> > whole binaries with PIC unnecesarily might be a bad thing. e.g. if I cannot
> > control
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 06:22:49AM +0100, Manfred Wassmann wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Rather than a second workalike program which relies on GNOME, I'd be
> > interested in something with this functionality that did not use GNOME
> > at all (or optionally).
>
> man a
Hi!
I made a package for the People in Austria wich are using PPtP ADSL, with the
required Bootscript and a large documentation...
First: Could anyone of you who is living in Austria and using ADSL test it
please?
Second: How can I add it to Debian testing/unstable?
I tested these Scripts for
Hi!
Antwort an Simon Richter:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Martin Eitzenberger wrote:
> > I made a package for the People in Austria wich are using PPtP ADSL,
> > with the required Bootscript and a large documentation...
>
> There is already a pppoe package in Debian, perhaps it would be a good
> idea
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Martin Eitzenberger wrote:
> I made a package for the People in Austria wich are using PPtP ADSL,
> with the required Bootscript and a large documentation...
There is already a pppoe package in Debian, perhaps it would be a good
idea to merge in your package with that?
S
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Will Newton wrote:
[PIC or not PIC]
> I understand the need for PIC, but I was asking whether or not compiling
> whole binaries with PIC unnecesarily might be a bad thing. e.g. if I cannot
> control the granularity of compiler options easily in a build system and I
> build a
Hi!
I made a package for the People in Austria wich are using PPtP ADSL, with the
required Bootscript and a large documentation...
First: Could anyone of you who is living in Austria and using ADSL test it
please?
Second: How can I add it to Debian testing/unstable?
I tested these Scripts for
30 matches
Mail list logo
