Julien LEMOINE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I consider this licence is DFSG conpliant, so I will put this 2
> libraries in main.
It sounds reasonable to me. The only thing that sounds a little
questionable is this:
> Permission is hereby also granted, without written agreement and
> without lic
Hello,
I am pakaging 2 library for eiffel (ITP #142764 and ITP #142765)
these two libraries are released under the conditions of the Eiffel Forum
Freeware License, version 1, here is a copy at the end of this mail.
I consider this licence is DFSG conpliant, so I will put this 2 libraries
DSPCAT.HTM
Description: Binary data
Julien LEMOINE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I consider this licence is DFSG conpliant, so I will put this 2
> libraries in main.
It sounds reasonable to me. The only thing that sounds a little
questionable is this:
> Permission is hereby also granted, without written agreement and
> without li
Hello,
I am pakaging 2 library for eiffel (ITP #142764 and ITP #142765)
these two libraries are released under the conditions of the Eiffel Forum
Freeware License, version 1, here is a copy at the end of this mail.
I consider this licence is DFSG conpliant, so I will put this 2 librarie
DSPCAT.HTM
Description: Binary data
>From freenet-unstable_0.4.3+20020409-1_i386.changes:
[...]
Urgency: medium
[...]
Changes:
freenet-unstable (0.4.3+20020409-1) unstable; urgency=medium
[...]
but still http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz
> shows:
* freenet-unstable (0.4.3+20020328-1 to 0.4
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i don't think users run it, so
>
> /usr/lib/tempest4eliza/mksong.sh
If it is really a shell script, /usr/share/... is more correct.
--
Robbe
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature
On Saturday 06 April 2002 19:52, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Julien LEMOINE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hello,
> > I am packaging a generic image processing library.
> >
> > This library has no .a or .so files, it's a template library,
> > so there is only .hh abd .hxx files for compi
> Well, this is not a question. I've just spent several hours wondering
> what the matter was with a package which refused to build. rules was
> failing with the following message:
>
> dpkg-gencontrol: error: per-package paragraph 1 in control info file is
> missing Package line
>
> I searched th
On 13-Apr-2002 Joey Hess wrote:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
>> > install man pages that are 0 length files. If you send me your build
>> > tree I can try to debug it.
>>
>> Ah, thanks. Some of the manpages are (oddly) zero-length. I'll have
>> to write some when I get time, if there are not any elsewh
>From freenet-unstable_0.4.3+20020409-1_i386.changes:
[...]
Urgency: medium
[...]
Changes:
freenet-unstable (0.4.3+20020409-1) unstable; urgency=medium
[...]
but still http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz
> shows:
* freenet-unstable (0.4.3+20020328-1 to 0.
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i don't think users run it, so
>
> /usr/lib/tempest4eliza/mksong.sh
If it is really a shell script, /usr/share/... is more correct.
--
Robbe
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature
Roger Leigh wrote:
> > install man pages that are 0 length files. If you send me your build
> > tree I can try to debug it.
>
> Ah, thanks. Some of the manpages are (oddly) zero-length. I'll have
> to write some when I get time, if there are not any elsewhere.
All right, the next version of deb
Well, this is not a question. I've just spent several hours wondering
what the matter was with a package which refused to build. rules was
failing with the following message:
dpkg-gencontrol: error: per-package paragraph 1 in control info file is
missing Package line
I searched the archive, and f
On Saturday 06 April 2002 19:52, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Julien LEMOINE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hello,
> > I am packaging a generic image processing library.
> >
> > This library has no .a or .so files, it's a template library,
> > so there is only .hh abd .hxx files for comp
> Well, this is not a question. I've just spent several hours wondering
> what the matter was with a package which refused to build. rules was
> failing with the following message:
>
> dpkg-gencontrol: error: per-package paragraph 1 in control info file is
> missing Package line
>
> I searched t
On 13-Apr-2002 Joey Hess wrote:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
>> > install man pages that are 0 length files. If you send me your build
>> > tree I can try to debug it.
>>
>> Ah, thanks. Some of the manpages are (oddly) zero-length. I'll have
>> to write some when I get time, if there are not any elsew
Roger Leigh wrote:
> > install man pages that are 0 length files. If you send me your build
> > tree I can try to debug it.
>
> Ah, thanks. Some of the manpages are (oddly) zero-length. I'll have
> to write some when I get time, if there are not any elsewhere.
All right, the next version of de
Well, this is not a question. I've just spent several hours wondering
what the matter was with a package which refused to build. rules was
failing with the following message:
dpkg-gencontrol: error: per-package paragraph 1 in control info file is
missing Package line
I searched the archive, and
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 12:36:12AM +0200, Martin Butterweck wrote:
> I made a package which has to go into contrib. Sadly, i have no idea of
> how to get it there. An appendix of the policy says I should state
> "contrib" as the distribution in the control file, but annotation 13
> (chapter control
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I'm getting some errors from dh_installman, and the manpages are not
> > getting installed:
> >
> > $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
> > [...]
> > dh_installman -i
> > Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/bi
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 12:36:12AM +0200, Martin Butterweck wrote:
> I made a package which has to go into contrib. Sadly, i have no idea of
> how to get it there. An appendix of the policy says I should state
> "contrib" as the distribution in the control file, but annotation 13
> (chapter contro
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I'm getting some errors from dh_installman, and the manpages are not
> > getting installed:
> >
> > $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
> > [...]
> > dh_installman -i
> > Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/b
24 matches
Mail list logo