On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 05:05:25PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > > > I waited 6 weeks before AM assigned. (I had advocate when applied.)
> > > > My AM does not yet contact me f
I have had a similar problem and solved it by exporting a LIBRARY_PATH
variable during the install step :
replacing
$(MAKE) install ...
by
export LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`/debian/tmp/usr/lib; $(MAKE) install ...
NOTE : LIBRARY_PATH not LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Hope this help,
Christophe
On Tue, Jun 2
I'm working on the new pilot-link packages, and having problems
installing the libraries from scratch (i.e. when a previous build of the
libraries is not already in /usr/lib). What is the correct way to
specify the correct path to get the relinking step to work without
breaking the installation?
On 25-Jun-2002 Ben Armstrong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking over the past month or so of debian-mentors, I'm seeing that quite a
> number of people's appeals for sponsorship or advocacy are apparently
> falling on deaf ears (unless these are being answered only in private
> email). If regulars here wo
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 10:37:13PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
> One thing I would like to have comments on though is the possible
> section of my package nvrec, which is dependent on liblame and the
> question if can be put into debian in the first place.
With some reengineering of nvrec, perhaps.
> could keep on top of these. I have tried to get the ball rolling by
> answering a couple of sponsorship requests today, but there are several
> others with subjects containing "sponsor", "RFS", or in one case "spronsor".
Sure, take your time :)
I already had some _very_ good comments and sugge
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > > I waited 6 weeks before AM assigned. (I had advocate when applied.)
> > > My AM does not yet contact me few days while I see his posting on ML.
I am trying to get a time window to process a
Hi,
Looking over the past month or so of debian-mentors, I'm seeing that quite a
number of people's appeals for sponsorship or advocacy are apparently
falling on deaf ears (unless these are being answered only in private
email). If regulars here would periodically scan the past week or more of
de
On 25-Jun-2002 Ben Armstrong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking over the past month or so of debian-mentors, I'm seeing that quite a
> number of people's appeals for sponsorship or advocacy are apparently
> falling on deaf ears (unless these are being answered only in private
> email). If regulars here w
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 01:43:11AM +0100, David H. Askew wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Some time ago I filed the bug report indicating my intentions to
> package jedit.
Would've been nice to cite a bug#. Never mind, I have located it:
#136535.
> This deb and its releases since the bug report have bee
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 10:37:13PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
> One thing I would like to have comments on though is the possible
> section of my package nvrec, which is dependent on liblame and the
> question if can be put into debian in the first place.
With some reengineering of nvrec, perhaps.
> could keep on top of these. I have tried to get the ball rolling by
> answering a couple of sponsorship requests today, but there are several
> others with subjects containing "sponsor", "RFS", or in one case "spronsor".
Sure, take your time :)
I already had some _very_ good comments and sugg
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
> and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
> but I
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 02:01:46PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 09:24:27PM -0700, Kristis Makris wrote:
> > tkxcd - a diff front end with a look and feel based on Atria Clearcase
> > xcleardiff. Similar to tkdiff. Outdated, but upstream has a much
> > improved version that
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > I waited 6 weeks before AM assigned. (I had advocate when applied.)
> > My AM does not yet contact me few days while I see his posting on ML.
> > But right after I moved to cue with AM, many people got AM. Somewhat
> > random.
> > Y
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > > I waited 6 weeks before AM assigned. (I had advocate when applied.)
> > > My AM does not yet contact me few days while I see his posting on ML.
I am trying to get a time window to process
Hi,
Looking over the past month or so of debian-mentors, I'm seeing that quite a
number of people's appeals for sponsorship or advocacy are apparently
falling on deaf ears (unless these are being answered only in private
email). If regulars here would periodically scan the past week or more of
d
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 09:24:27PM -0700, Kristis Makris wrote:
> tkxcd - a diff front end with a look and feel based on Atria Clearcase
> xcleardiff. Similar to tkdiff. Outdated, but upstream has a much
> improved version that I'm pushing him to formally release.
This one looks interesting. I'm
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 01:43:11AM +0100, David H. Askew wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Some time ago I filed the bug report indicating my intentions to
> package jedit.
Would've been nice to cite a bug#. Never mind, I have located it:
#136535.
> This deb and its releases since the bug report have be
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
> and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
> but I
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 02:01:46PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 09:24:27PM -0700, Kristis Makris wrote:
> > tkxcd - a diff front end with a look and feel based on Atria Clearcase
> > xcleardiff. Similar to tkdiff. Outdated, but upstream has a much
> > improved version that
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > I waited 6 weeks before AM assigned. (I had advocate when applied.)
> > My AM does not yet contact me few days while I see his posting on ML.
> > But right after I moved to cue with AM, many people got AM. Somewhat
> > random.
> >
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 09:24:27PM -0700, Kristis Makris wrote:
> tkxcd - a diff front end with a look and feel based on Atria Clearcase
> xcleardiff. Similar to tkdiff. Outdated, but upstream has a much
> improved version that I'm pushing him to formally release.
This one looks interesting. I'm
> I waited 6 weeks before AM assigned. (I had advocate when applied.)
> My AM does not yet contact me few days while I see his posting on ML.
> But right after I moved to cue with AM, many people got AM. Somewhat
> random.
> You can see this nm.debin.org/nmlist.php.
> People are busy now due to m
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
> and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
> but I
> I waited 6 weeks before AM assigned. (I had advocate when applied.)
> My AM does not yet contact me few days while I see his posting on ML.
> But right after I moved to cue with AM, many people got AM. Somewhat
> random.
> You can see this nm.debin.org/nmlist.php.
> People are busy now due to
Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
Wait another 2 - 3 weeks.
Go and read all at nm.debian.org, including the templates for the AM.
Prepare you for
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
> and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
> but I
Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
Wait another 2 - 3 weeks.
Go and read all at nm.debian.org, including the templates for the AM.
Prepare you fo
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
^^
> Hello,
>
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
^^^
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
> and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
> but I just want to
Hello,
I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
but I just want to ask how long you have to wait normally at the moment.
My advo
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
^^
> Hello,
>
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
^^^
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
Hi ...
there are 4 packages at
http://bourbaki.math.uni-kiel.de/~jpalic/debian/upload/
which should be uploaded. My sponsor is very very buisy, so I hope,
someone can have a look and sponsor my packages.
The changelogs ...
ghostview (1.5-28) unstable; urgency=low
* dropped the LD_PR
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
> and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
> but I just want t
Hello,
I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
but I just want to ask how long you have to wait normally at the moment.
My adv
36 matches
Mail list logo
