Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread John Belmonte
Jeff Bailey wrote: Hi, I'm new to this also but... E: mailutils-imap4d: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libmailutils0, libmailutils0 (= 20020713-1) The generate mailutils.pop3d-substvars has: The error is for mailutils-imap4d, but you are looking at the config for mailutils.pop3d?

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In my control file I have: Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, netbase, libmailutils0 (= ${Source-Version}) However, Lintian throws up on me for: E: mailutils-imap4d: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libmailutils0, libmailutils0 (= 20020713-1) This sounds like

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Ove Kaaven
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Jeff Bailey wrote: I'm having some trouble I can't seem to find the answer to. Mailutils creates both 'mailutils-pop3d', and 'libmailutils0'. The two need to tightly depend on one another, since the ABI hasn't stabilized yet. In my control file I have: Depends:

RE: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 14-Jul-2002 Jeff Bailey wrote: I'm having some trouble I can't seem to find the answer to. Mailutils creates both 'mailutils-pop3d', and 'libmailutils0'. The two need to tightly depend on one another, since the ABI hasn't stabilized yet. In my control file I have: Depends:

Sponsor for mcplay package.

2002-07-14 Thread Jesus Climent
Hi I am looking for an sponsor for my package. I have already applied for debian devel status, but it is taking some time. The package is locate at pumuki.hispalinux.es/debian/mcplay/ mcplay is a c-clone of the popular python frontend for mpg123/ogg123 which seems to be as powerfull as the

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 11:18:27PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: I'm having some trouble I can't seem to find the answer to. Mailutils creates both 'mailutils-pop3d', and 'libmailutils0'. The two need to tightly depend on one another, since the ABI hasn't stabilized yet. In my control file I

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 14-Jul-2002 Colin Watson wrote: On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:14:30AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: On 14-Jul-2002 Jeff Bailey wrote: Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, netbase, libmailutils0 (= ${Source-Version}) However, Lintian throws up on me for: E: mailutils-imap4d:

GConf schemas and debian/conffiles

2002-07-14 Thread Devin Carraway
I'm trying to package up acme, a GNOME2 utility for making multimedia keyboard buttons work. One problem I've observed: acme uses GConf, which stores schema files under /etc/gconf/. The schema files give the configuration structure and default values, but aren't configuration files themselves,

Re: GConf schemas and debian/conffiles

2002-07-14 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 05:27:12PM -0700, Devin Carraway wrote: If I don't do anything special, the package placing the schema file as /etc/gconf/acme.schemas will be flagged by lintian with file-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile. Looking at some other packages, gnome-gv doesn't put the file in

Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Jeff Bailey
I'm having some trouble I can't seem to find the answer to. Mailutils creates both 'mailutils-pop3d', and 'libmailutils0'. The two need to tightly depend on one another, since the ABI hasn't stabilized yet. In my control file I have: Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, netbase, libmailutils0 (=

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread John Belmonte
Jeff Bailey wrote: Hi, I'm new to this also but... E: mailutils-imap4d: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libmailutils0, libmailutils0 (= 20020713-1) The generate mailutils.pop3d-substvars has: The error is for mailutils-imap4d, but you are looking at the config for mailutils.pop3d?

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In my control file I have: Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, netbase, libmailutils0 (= ${Source-Version}) However, Lintian throws up on me for: E: mailutils-imap4d: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libmailutils0, libmailutils0 (= 20020713-1) This sounds like

Re: dir permissions

2002-07-14 Thread Jens Peter Secher
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do the chmod after calling dh_fixperms. Or better still, use the X option of dh_fixperms. -- Jens Peter Secher _jpsecher get2net dk DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1_ -- To

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Ove Kaaven
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Jeff Bailey wrote: I'm having some trouble I can't seem to find the answer to. Mailutils creates both 'mailutils-pop3d', and 'libmailutils0'. The two need to tightly depend on one another, since the ABI hasn't stabilized yet. In my control file I have: Depends:

RE: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 14-Jul-2002 Jeff Bailey wrote: I'm having some trouble I can't seem to find the answer to. Mailutils creates both 'mailutils-pop3d', and 'libmailutils0'. The two need to tightly depend on one another, since the ABI hasn't stabilized yet. In my control file I have: Depends:

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 11:18:27PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: I'm having some trouble I can't seem to find the answer to. Mailutils creates both 'mailutils-pop3d', and 'libmailutils0'. The two need to tightly depend on one another, since the ABI hasn't stabilized yet. In my control file I

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:14:30AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: On 14-Jul-2002 Jeff Bailey wrote: Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, netbase, libmailutils0 (= ${Source-Version}) However, Lintian throws up on me for: E: mailutils-imap4d: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libmailutils0,

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 14-Jul-2002 Colin Watson wrote: On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:14:30AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: On 14-Jul-2002 Jeff Bailey wrote: Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, netbase, libmailutils0 (= ${Source-Version}) However, Lintian throws up on me for: E: mailutils-imap4d:

GConf schemas and debian/conffiles

2002-07-14 Thread Devin Carraway
I'm trying to package up acme, a GNOME2 utility for making multimedia keyboard buttons work. One problem I've observed: acme uses GConf, which stores schema files under /etc/gconf/. The schema files give the configuration structure and default values, but aren't configuration files themselves,

Re: GConf schemas and debian/conffiles

2002-07-14 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 05:27:12PM -0700, Devin Carraway wrote: If I don't do anything special, the package placing the schema file as /etc/gconf/acme.schemas will be flagged by lintian with file-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile. Looking at some other packages, gnome-gv doesn't put the file in